Libs Call For Assange's Murder...Assange Announcement Cancelled Due To Security Concerns

[coldjoint]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

You wish.

Can I interest you in these beautiful tin foil hats? Made to order, free shipping!

Will you be visiting Hillary in prison?

 

[easyt65]

K, I don't care what he does, but I do know he has no legal obligation to release them...like Hillary did to releae all of her work-related documents yet refused to do so...illegally.

Hey dopey. The reason he isn't releasing anything is because he doesn't have anything. Not some batshit insane conspiracy your mentally ill brain cooked up.

Hey 'dopey', nice OPINION...

 

[WheelieAddict]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

That's my speculation also

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

 

[kiwiman127]

K, I don't care what he does, but I do know he has no legal obligation to release them...like Hillary did to releae all of her work-related documents yet refused to do so...illegally.

"I don't care what he does"
Liar! Your world revolves around Donald Trump. Proof? Explain your hundreds of threads about "Trump=good" & "Hillary=evil".
Anyway, my condolences regarding Assange standing you up.

 

[easyt65]

I don't understand!!! Assange and Snowden have been proclaimed a national hero by the left.

I guess it depends on whose dirty laundry gets aired.

True. The right loves Assange now after years of calling him a criminal.

Funny thing, he lives in a prison. A nice one I'm sure but he's still mostly a prisoner.

At least he is where Hillary can't help him have an 'accident'...

 

[easyt65]

K, I don't care what he does, but I do know he has no legal obligation to release them...like Hillary did to releae all of her work-related documents yet refused to do so...illegally.

"I don't care what he does"
Liar! Your world revolves around Donald Trump. Proof? Explain your hundreds of threads about "Trump=good" & "Hillary=evil".
Anyway, my condolences regarding Assange standing you up.

Wow, you lie your ass off when you get pissed because someone doesn't say what you want them to say.... lol

 

[Lakhota]

Libs Call For Assange's Murder...Assange Announcement Cancelled Due To Security Concerns

Who gives a shit. Trump suckers are a dying breed, anyway. Why prolong the inevitable...

 

[WheelieAddict]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

You wish.

Can I interest you in these beautiful tin foil hats? Made to order, free shipping!

Will you be visiting Hillary in prison?

Yes I will, in the imaginary insane conservative prison. Where Obama is a Kenyan and Michele Obama is a tranny and Hillary is a lesbian and all the other batshit insane shit you fucking morons believe.

 

[MisterBeale]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

That's my speculation also

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

Nope, this is all new, from just this year. I don't know where you have been. . .

For those who are fascinated but don’t have the time or inclination to sift through more than 30,000 documents, here is a snapshot of what Clinton’s emails revealed:

Not sure you've covered this. Recent Hilary email leak shows Obama rejected democratization in Libya.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Removal of Assad regime was aimed at maintaining strategic & nuclear domination of Israel, reveals Hilary's email.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Put #Hilary to prison for calling for overthrow sovereign country,#Syria leader
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video blocked
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

 

[WheelieAddict]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

That's my speculation also

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

Nope, this is all new, from just this year. I don't know where you have been. . .

For those who are fascinated but don’t have the time or inclination to sift through more than 30,000 documents, here is a snapshot of what Clinton’s emails revealed:

Not sure you've covered this. Recent Hilary email leak shows Obama rejected democratization in Libya.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Removal of Assad regime was aimed at maintaining strategic & nuclear domination of Israel, reveals Hilary's email.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Put #Hilary to prison for calling for overthrow sovereign country,#Syria leader
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video blocked
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Thiss looks like bullshit renditions of what was in the leaks. Where's the links to prove each statement? I'm not disbelieving you but when you post a bunch of stuff like that you need to back it up.

 

[MisterBeale]

That's my speculation also

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

Nope, this is all new, from just this year. I don't know where you have been. . .

For those who are fascinated but don’t have the time or inclination to sift through more than 30,000 documents, here is a snapshot of what Clinton’s emails revealed:

Not sure you've covered this. Recent Hilary email leak shows Obama rejected democratization in Libya.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Removal of Assad regime was aimed at maintaining strategic & nuclear domination of Israel, reveals Hilary's email.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Put #Hilary to prison for calling for overthrow sovereign country,#Syria leader
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video blocked
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Thiss looks like bullshit renditions of what was in the leaks. Where's the links to prove each statement? I'm not disbelieving you but when you post a bunch of stuff like that you need to back it up.

Do you not see the hotlinks below each statement linking directly to Wikileaks? Are you on a smartphone not able to access them? Or do you just not like to read?

 

[WheelieAddict]

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

Nope, this is all new, from just this year. I don't know where you have been. . .

For those who are fascinated but don’t have the time or inclination to sift through more than 30,000 documents, here is a snapshot of what Clinton’s emails revealed:

Not sure you've covered this. Recent Hilary email leak shows Obama rejected democratization in Libya.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Removal of Assad regime was aimed at maintaining strategic & nuclear domination of Israel, reveals Hilary's email.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Put #Hilary to prison for calling for overthrow sovereign country,#Syria leader
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video blocked
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Thiss looks like bullshit renditions of what was in the leaks. Where's the links to prove each statement? I'm not disbelieving you but when you post a bunch of stuff like that you need to back it up.

Do you not see the hotlinks below each statement linking directly to Wikileaks? Are you on a smartphone not able to access them? Or do you just not like to read?

My bad they didn't work for me when you posted. Maybe my browser messed up. Thanks.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Sounds like a bullshit cop out because they have nothing new to offer.

That's my speculation also

It's the most obvious answer. Assange has a history of teasing "big leak soon" and not coming through. As an example earlier this year with the DNC leaks he posted a bunch of ominous tweets and then it was just some audio recordings that were in the leaks he had already released.

Wow, that's crap.


You obviously never went to the site and read them, did you?


Did you ever read the one where Hillary uses an ear piece at speeches to be fed lines?


Did you read the one where she describes the policy of nation building and regime change, moving weapons and insurgent groups to Syria?


I don't think you read any of those Wikileaks. If you did, you couldn't possible still support her.


I don't think you read any of the DNC leaked emails either, the ones that CLEARLY showed that the media was taking orders from the DNC, you just watched that video, didn't you? Why? Because you don't like reading.

I imagine you didn't even have the attention span to make it to the end of this post. . . . . .

That's nice. So after all the bullshit you wrote, show where I am wrong. Assange tweeted about a new release and then released audio from a previous one.

Nope, this is all new, from just this year. I don't know where you have been. . .

For those who are fascinated but don’t have the time or inclination to sift through more than 30,000 documents, here is a snapshot of what Clinton’s emails revealed:

Not sure you've covered this. Recent Hilary email leak shows Obama rejected democratization in Libya.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Removal of Assad regime was aimed at maintaining strategic & nuclear domination of Israel, reveals Hilary's email.
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Put #Hilary to prison for calling for overthrow sovereign country,#Syria leader
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep #Bengazhi video blocked
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Sigh......#1 shows intelligence about Libya but nowhere shows "Obama rejected democratization in Libya "

Are the rest of the link titles going to be bullshit about their contents as well?

 

[Vigilante]

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Julian Assange and his free-speech brainchild Wikileaks were once lauded as global heroes of public service among United States politicians and policy makers. But by 2010, four years after its inception during the President George W. Bush administration, Assange and his organization were no longer considered lovable troublemakers and mavericks.

A year into President Barack Obama’s first term, Wikileaks was suddenly considered an out-of-control free-speech Frankenstein wreaking havoc on United States foreign policy and intelligence gathering at the direction of Assange, its proverbial Dr. Frankenstein.

The honeymoon for the whistle-blower web site, once a darling of the Democratic Party, was now over. Even more alarming, Assange’s personal safety and organization were increasingly at risk from U.S. concerns.

By November 2010, Assange was a household name globally, but especially on Capitol Hill. And in the State Department alone his prowess of releasing otherwise secret, damning military documents and emails were filling conference rooms at Foggy Bottom and the White House with policy wonks and bureaucrats desperately seeking to squelch the upstart Wikileaks. At the State Department, meeting after meeting was conducted about how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her inner circle were going to squash Assange and Wikileaks latest planned document dump on the United States. Deemed “CableGate,” Assange planned to release confidential cables, or communications, unveiling damaging internal conversations between State Department personnel and its foreign assets and allies.

Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.

Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:....

MORE...MUCH MORE......

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

 

[Frank'sRules]

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Julian Assange and his free-speech brainchild Wikileaks were once lauded as global heroes of public service among United States politicians and policy makers. But by 2010, four years after its inception during the President George W. Bush administration, Assange and his organization were no longer considered lovable troublemakers and mavericks.

A year into President Barack Obama’s first term, Wikileaks was suddenly considered an out-of-control free-speech Frankenstein wreaking havoc on United States foreign policy and intelligence gathering at the direction of Assange, its proverbial Dr. Frankenstein.

The honeymoon for the whistle-blower web site, once a darling of the Democratic Party, was now over. Even more alarming, Assange’s personal safety and organization were increasingly at risk from U.S. concerns.

By November 2010, Assange was a household name globally, but especially on Capitol Hill. And in the State Department alone his prowess of releasing otherwise secret, damning military documents and emails were filling conference rooms at Foggy Bottom and the White House with policy wonks and bureaucrats desperately seeking to squelch the upstart Wikileaks. At the State Department, meeting after meeting was conducted about how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her inner circle were going to squash Assange and Wikileaks latest planned document dump on the United States. Deemed “CableGate,” Assange planned to release confidential cables, or communications, unveiling damaging internal conversations between State Department personnel and its foreign assets and allies.

Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.

Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:....

MORE...MUCH MORE......

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

We aren't going to be using drones on downtown London.

 

[Vigilante]

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Julian Assange and his free-speech brainchild Wikileaks were once lauded as global heroes of public service among United States politicians and policy makers. But by 2010, four years after its inception during the President George W. Bush administration, Assange and his organization were no longer considered lovable troublemakers and mavericks.

A year into President Barack Obama’s first term, Wikileaks was suddenly considered an out-of-control free-speech Frankenstein wreaking havoc on United States foreign policy and intelligence gathering at the direction of Assange, its proverbial Dr. Frankenstein.

The honeymoon for the whistle-blower web site, once a darling of the Democratic Party, was now over. Even more alarming, Assange’s personal safety and organization were increasingly at risk from U.S. concerns.

By November 2010, Assange was a household name globally, but especially on Capitol Hill. And in the State Department alone his prowess of releasing otherwise secret, damning military documents and emails were filling conference rooms at Foggy Bottom and the White House with policy wonks and bureaucrats desperately seeking to squelch the upstart Wikileaks. At the State Department, meeting after meeting was conducted about how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her inner circle were going to squash Assange and Wikileaks latest planned document dump on the United States. Deemed “CableGate,” Assange planned to release confidential cables, or communications, unveiling damaging internal conversations between State Department personnel and its foreign assets and allies.

Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.

Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:....

MORE...MUCH MORE......

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

We aren't going to be using drones on downtown London.

Try READING the story, you fucking left wing asswipe... You just keep showing that IQ drop with every post!!!

 

[Vigilante]

WIKILEAKS OCTOBER SURPRISE DROPPING TUESDAY WIKILEAKS DID NOT CANCEL TUESDAY ANNOUNCEMENT
Inquistr ^ | 10/02/2016 | Tara West

 

[bripat9643]

In August?...it's October.

Whattsamatter? Sad no one has killed him yet?

Whatsamatter? You don't like facts?

Bob Beckel Called for WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange to Be Assassinated

You mean the fact that Bob Beckel wants someone to kill Assange? So you're OK with that?

 

[Frank'sRules]

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Julian Assange and his free-speech brainchild Wikileaks were once lauded as global heroes of public service among United States politicians and policy makers. But by 2010, four years after its inception during the President George W. Bush administration, Assange and his organization were no longer considered lovable troublemakers and mavericks.

A year into President Barack Obama’s first term, Wikileaks was suddenly considered an out-of-control free-speech Frankenstein wreaking havoc on United States foreign policy and intelligence gathering at the direction of Assange, its proverbial Dr. Frankenstein.

The honeymoon for the whistle-blower web site, once a darling of the Democratic Party, was now over. Even more alarming, Assange’s personal safety and organization were increasingly at risk from U.S. concerns.

By November 2010, Assange was a household name globally, but especially on Capitol Hill. And in the State Department alone his prowess of releasing otherwise secret, damning military documents and emails were filling conference rooms at Foggy Bottom and the White House with policy wonks and bureaucrats desperately seeking to squelch the upstart Wikileaks. At the State Department, meeting after meeting was conducted about how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her inner circle were going to squash Assange and Wikileaks latest planned document dump on the United States. Deemed “CableGate,” Assange planned to release confidential cables, or communications, unveiling damaging internal conversations between State Department personnel and its foreign assets and allies.

Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.

Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:....

MORE...MUCH MORE......

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

We aren't going to be using drones on downtown London.

Try READING the story, you fucking left wing asswipe... You just keep showing that IQ drop with every post!!!

I read enough. And it wasn't such a bad idea. He was/is exposing our secrets.

 

[Vigilante]

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

Julian Assange and his free-speech brainchild Wikileaks were once lauded as global heroes of public service among United States politicians and policy makers. But by 2010, four years after its inception during the President George W. Bush administration, Assange and his organization were no longer considered lovable troublemakers and mavericks.

A year into President Barack Obama’s first term, Wikileaks was suddenly considered an out-of-control free-speech Frankenstein wreaking havoc on United States foreign policy and intelligence gathering at the direction of Assange, its proverbial Dr. Frankenstein.

The honeymoon for the whistle-blower web site, once a darling of the Democratic Party, was now over. Even more alarming, Assange’s personal safety and organization were increasingly at risk from U.S. concerns.

By November 2010, Assange was a household name globally, but especially on Capitol Hill. And in the State Department alone his prowess of releasing otherwise secret, damning military documents and emails were filling conference rooms at Foggy Bottom and the White House with policy wonks and bureaucrats desperately seeking to squelch the upstart Wikileaks. At the State Department, meeting after meeting was conducted about how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her inner circle were going to squash Assange and Wikileaks latest planned document dump on the United States. Deemed “CableGate,” Assange planned to release confidential cables, or communications, unveiling damaging internal conversations between State Department personnel and its foreign assets and allies.

Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.

Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:....

MORE...MUCH MORE......

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

We aren't going to be using drones on downtown London.

Try READING the story, you fucking left wing asswipe... You just keep showing that IQ drop with every post!!!

I read enough. And it wasn't such a bad idea. He was/is exposing our secrets.

Bet you'd feel the same way if he was exposing Republican's like he is Dimwits....NOT!!!!