Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When Obama said that I knew the country had a fucking coward simpleton in the White house.Says who? He is the Commander In Chief. He knows that a Glock can have "a lot of clips in it" So, there. That refutes your ridiculous accusation. /sarc/First of all you would need a belt of ammo, but I suspect most any Over the counter ar15 would jam 60/100 rounds into it. After all it's just a sporting rifle... fuck ups like Barry doesnt know their ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to military gear and weapons...The only way a semi automatic AR-15 is going to fire 700 rounds a minute is if the flash is firing it.
Lol
Grayson farts through his mouth.i wonder how many times alan grayson can fart in one hour
99.99% of people who use a .223 use it to hunt deer.The Next Time Someone Calls an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This
For you idiots on the Left.. aka Dumbasses on steroids.
From the article:
The AR-15 is not that powerful when compared to common hunting rifles. A .223 round is often too small to take down large game like deer and elk.
In many cases, the .223 is prohibited for hunting certain game. Because of its lack of power, it might not fully kill the animal, leading to suffering.
NO AK15 ever made, 'military grade' included, will fire 700 rounds a minute. You'd be lucky to quick-fire 100 rounds before the mechanisms would expand from the heat to the point where the tolerances become too small. The gun will stop working like a car engine with no oil driving at 100 MPH.You do however have to add a slide-fire stock. Some people call them a "bump-fire" stock.
Anyway, the AR-15 doesn't come with one of these stocks, a person would need to purchase one extra.
The gun it's self is capable of that. That has nothing to do with the shooter's ability to use the gun's capability. Think of it in terms of a race car. A regular driver can't get around the track nearly as fast as a nascar driver in the same car. That doesn't mean the car isn't capable of it.
I'm not so sure of that. Even if you had that many rounds ready to go, I wouldn't want that firearm near me, you're bound to have a meltdown with that many rounds going through at that rate.
NO AK15 ever made, 'military grade' included, will fire 700 rounds a minute. You'd be lucky to quick-fire 100 rounds before the mechanisms would expand from the heat to the point where the tolerances become too small. The gun will stop working like a car engine with no oil driving at 100 MPH.You do however have to add a slide-fire stock. Some people call them a "bump-fire" stock.
Anyway, the AR-15 doesn't come with one of these stocks, a person would need to purchase one extra.
The gun it's self is capable of that. That has nothing to do with the shooter's ability to use the gun's capability. Think of it in terms of a race car. A regular driver can't get around the track nearly as fast as a nascar driver in the same car. That doesn't mean the car isn't capable of it.
I'm not so sure of that. Even if you had that many rounds ready to go, I wouldn't want that firearm near me, you're bound to have a meltdown with that many rounds going through at that rate.
This thread already has videos of 600 rounds per minute rate being fired through them.
NO AK15 ever made, 'military grade' included, will fire 700 rounds a minute. You'd be lucky to quick-fire 100 rounds before the mechanisms would expand from the heat to the point where the tolerances become too small. The gun will stop working like a car engine with no oil driving at 100 MPH.You do however have to add a slide-fire stock. Some people call them a "bump-fire" stock.
Anyway, the AR-15 doesn't come with one of these stocks, a person would need to purchase one extra.
The gun it's self is capable of that. That has nothing to do with the shooter's ability to use the gun's capability. Think of it in terms of a race car. A regular driver can't get around the track nearly as fast as a nascar driver in the same car. That doesn't mean the car isn't capable of it.
I'm not so sure of that. Even if you had that many rounds ready to go, I wouldn't want that firearm near me, you're bound to have a meltdown with that many rounds going through at that rate.
This thread already has videos of 600 rounds per minute rate being fired through them.
give it up Dawg, these idiots woudn't know the difference between RATE OF FIRE from their butts even with a video.
Alan Grayson On Are You Dumber Than a Fifth Grader,,,,,Jeff: OK, Mr. Grayson. How much is 200 plus 300? Alan: 700?The Next Time Someone Calls an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This
For you idiots on the Left.. aka Dumbasses on steroids.
From the article:
The AR-15 is not that powerful when compared to common hunting rifles. A .223 round is often too small to take down large game like deer and elk.
In many cases, the .223 is prohibited for hunting certain game. Because of its lack of power, it might not fully kill the animal, leading to suffering.
NO AK15 ever made, 'military grade' included, will fire 700 rounds a minute. You'd be lucky to quick-fire 100 rounds before the mechanisms would expand from the heat to the point where the tolerances become too small. The gun will stop working like a car engine with no oil driving at 100 MPH.The gun it's self is capable of that. That has nothing to do with the shooter's ability to use the gun's capability. Think of it in terms of a race car. A regular driver can't get around the track nearly as fast as a nascar driver in the same car. That doesn't mean the car isn't capable of it.
I'm not so sure of that. Even if you had that many rounds ready to go, I wouldn't want that firearm near me, you're bound to have a meltdown with that many rounds going through at that rate.
This thread already has videos of 600 rounds per minute rate being fired through them.
give it up Dawg, these idiots woudn't know the difference between RATE OF FIRE from their butts even with a video.
They are a little dumber than the usual group.
The AR-15 full auto is listed as being able to fire 800 rounds a minute, not 700 thus 700 rounds per minute is conservative.Alan Grayson claims AR-15 rifles can fire ‘700 rounds in a minute’ after Orlando terror attack
OMG The ignorance of liberals is astounding.
FROM YOUR LINK
ArmaLite / Colt AR-15 Select-Fire Automatic Rifle (1958)
that is not the same as the ar-15 on the market today
either you are ignorant or deceptive which is it
Yes, that was the initial year of service, but if you read the line right below the title
"Continuation of the ArmaLite / Colt AR-15 Select-Fire Automatic Rifle development period and operational history."
You will see that the article covers the history of it and the changes it went through.
you can not buy a current SELECT FIRE ar-15 legally
Other than modifications made to prevent automatic fire, nobody has yet been able to say what is different between the two. I've looked at prints for both. Those are the only modifications made, and none of them reduce the time required for the gun to chamber the next shell and be ready for the next firing. The gun is capable of the same rate. If you can't pull the trigger that fast, it's not the gun's fault.
still you had been dishonest with your link
the original ar-15 was not a civilian model
the second paragraph makes that clear
the select fire and semi auto are two different firearms
Bump fire is not auto fire.
The only guns Grayson's ever seen are the ones his armed security personnel carry to protect his dumb ass. Never take advice from dumb Limousine Liberals. They're dishonest hypocrites of the worst kind. They're most often very wealthy well-protected elites. They live in luxurious secured mansions guarded by folks with guns. They're children attend the most well-protected elite private schools in the world.
They don't have to live in the real world. They get to live in their elitist fantasy world. Living in the real world is only for the peasants. So don't take their advice. Arm and protect yourself and your family. Wealthy elitists like Clinton and Grayson aren't gonna be there to save you from the savages. They're far too busy munching on caviar and sipping the finest champagne to help you. You're on your own. Never forget that.
As Andrew Wilkow always says: "Socialism is for the people....not the socialist". There isn't a single liberal alive - master or minion - who believes that the ignorant policies they advocate for applies to them.
Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton want to ban guns. Yet they are surrounded by an arsenal of fully automatic weapons 24x7. How does that make any sense?
out here you can use a .223 but shot placement has to be spot on and 100 yards or lessThe Next Time Someone Calls an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This
For you idiots on the Left.. aka Dumbasses on steroids.
From the article:
The AR-15 is not that powerful when compared to common hunting rifles. A .223 round is often too small to take down large game like deer and elk.
In many cases, the .223 is prohibited for hunting certain game. Because of its lack of power, it might not fully kill the animal, leading to suffering.
Grayson farts through his mouth.i wonder how many times alan grayson can fart in one hour
The only guns Grayson's ever seen are the ones his armed security personnel carry to protect his dumb ass. Never take advice from dumb Limousine Liberals. They're dishonest hypocrites of the worst kind. They're most often very wealthy well-protected elites. They live in luxurious secured mansions guarded by folks with guns. They're children attend the most well-protected elite private schools in the world.
They don't have to live in the real world. They get to live in their elitist fantasy world. Living in the real world is only for the peasants. So don't take their advice. Arm and protect yourself and your family. Wealthy elitists like Clinton and Grayson aren't gonna be there to save you from the savages. They're far too busy munching on caviar and sipping the finest champagne to help you. You're on your own. Never forget that.
As Andrew Wilkow always says: "Socialism is for the people....not the socialist". There isn't a single liberal alive - master or minion - who believes that the ignorant policies they advocate for applies to them.
Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton want to ban guns. Yet they are surrounded by an arsenal of fully automatic weapons 24x7. How does that make any sense?
amen brother
that is the way of the limousine liberal
do as i say not as i do
"Socialism is for the people.....not the socialist" - Andrew WilkowThe only guns Grayson's ever seen are the ones his armed security personnel carry to protect his dumb ass. Never take advice from dumb Limousine Liberals. They're dishonest hypocrites of the worst kind. They're most often very wealthy well-protected elites. They live in luxurious secured mansions guarded by folks with guns. They're children attend the most well-protected elite private schools in the world.
They don't have to live in the real world. They get to live in their elitist fantasy world. Living in the real world is only for the peasants. So don't take their advice. Arm and protect yourself and your family. Wealthy elitists like Clinton and Grayson aren't gonna be there to save you from the savages. They're far too busy munching on caviar and sipping the finest champagne to help you. You're on your own. Never forget that.
As Andrew Wilkow always says: "Socialism is for the people....not the socialist". There isn't a single liberal alive - master or minion - who believes that the ignorant policies they advocate for applies to them.
Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton want to ban guns. Yet they are surrounded by an arsenal of fully automatic weapons 24x7. How does that make any sense?
amen brother
that is the way of the limousine liberal
do as i say not as i do
Limousine Liberals make me sick. Very well-protected pampered hypocrites. I blasted that spoiled dumbass Katie Couric on Twitter the other day. I actually got a lot of positive feedback. She lives in a couple of massive well-guarded mansions. She's a classic example of a delusional Limousine Liberal living in an elitist fantasy world. She doesn't have to live in the real world.
The entire "military grade" vs. "civilian" model is an absurd discussion anyway. The founders full intended us to have nothing but "military grade" weapons. They wrote over and over and over that the 2nd Amendment was explicitly to protect the people from the government. That the people should easily be able to over throw their own government if necessary.
So it's a dumb argument. The American people have the Constitutional right to any military weapon in the world. And yes...that means up to and including nuclear weapons. But that won't be an issue for you ignorant dumbocrats as there are no American companies that sell nuclear weapons. That means getting one off the black market (tens of millions of dollars incidentally - meaning only the ultra wealthy elite can afford it and I suspect Bill Gates and Warren Buffet aren't in the market for a nuclear bomb) from another nation. In addition - nuclear bombs require multiple codes to launch (it is a basic safety measure - even the president of the United States cannot launch a nuclear weapon by himself). So this is yet another nonsensical, immature position by desperate liberals attempting to justify their anti-constitutional, anti-American position.
Bottom line - we have a right to any "military-grade" weapon.
I can't afford the F-15's and wouldn't know how to fly them. The reaper drones armed with hellfire missiles certainly pique my interest, but again, when I weigh cost and practically it's not something I would do. For now, I'm focused on the Dillon M134 "mini" gun (nothing mini about that bad ass):The entire "military grade" vs. "civilian" model is an absurd discussion anyway. The founders full intended us to have nothing but "military grade" weapons. They wrote over and over and over that the 2nd Amendment was explicitly to protect the people from the government. That the people should easily be able to over throw their own government if necessary.
So it's a dumb argument. The American people have the Constitutional right to any military weapon in the world. And yes...that means up to and including nuclear weapons. But that won't be an issue for you ignorant dumbocrats as there are no American companies that sell nuclear weapons. That means getting one off the black market (tens of millions of dollars incidentally - meaning only the ultra wealthy elite can afford it and I suspect Bill Gates and Warren Buffet aren't in the market for a nuclear bomb) from another nation. In addition - nuclear bombs require multiple codes to launch (it is a basic safety measure - even the president of the United States cannot launch a nuclear weapon by himself). So this is yet another nonsensical, immature position by desperate liberals attempting to justify their anti-constitutional, anti-American position.
Bottom line - we have a right to any "military-grade" weapon.
So go get yourself a couple of F15s and a hand full armed drones.
