Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.WHAT "queer mafia"? Shoppers? Shoppers don't know from advertising whether somebody running a business is involved in one of these queer cults? How could they?Name the muslim bakeries targeted by the queer mafia.Name them. And the messages they refused to put on a cake.The Christian bakers that refuse to print a message on the cake that endorses queer marriage.
Which one do you accept as the Word of God?Not at all...there are many differences...some to the point that some christian sects will accept only one compared to the others.......but ultimately, they are ALL translations upon translations upon translations.I'm asking a serious question....you DO know that there are several versions out there, right?My, aren't you the coy one!WHich bible?I wish people that call themselves Christians and don't believe the Bible would identify themselves so we know right away who the wolves in sheep's clothing are.
If you're referring to differences such as the King James Bible and the New International version, these are only differences in wording but the message is the same from Bible to Bible. Unless you're referring to versions that actually convey a different message or give different specifics such as "Jesus wept" as opposed to "Jesus said 'Fuck!'" that I don't know about.
Not at all...there are many differences...some to the point that some christian sects will accept only one compared to the others.......but ultimately, they are ALL translations upon translations upon translations.I'm asking a serious question....you DO know that there are several versions out there, right?My, aren't you the coy one!WHich bible?I wish people that call themselves Christians and don't believe the Bible would identify themselves so we know right away who the wolves in sheep's clothing are.
If you're referring to differences such as the King James Bible and the New International version, these are only differences in wording but the message is the same from Bible to Bible. Unless you're referring to versions that actually convey a different message or give different specifics such as "Jesus wept" as opposed to "Jesus said 'Fuck!'" that I don't know about.
Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.WHAT "queer mafia"? Shoppers? Shoppers don't know from advertising whether somebody running a business is involved in one of these queer cults? How could they?Name the muslim bakeries targeted by the queer mafia.Name them. And the messages they refused to put on a cake.
I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.WHAT "queer mafia"? Shoppers? Shoppers don't know from advertising whether somebody running a business is involved in one of these queer cults? How could they?Name the muslim bakeries targeted by the queer mafia.
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
If you can...then do so.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.WHAT "queer mafia"? Shoppers? Shoppers don't know from advertising whether somebody running a business is involved in one of these queer cults? How could they?
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.WHAT "queer mafia"? Shoppers? Shoppers don't know from advertising whether somebody running a business is involved in one of these queer cults? How could they?
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
Queer Activists target Christian businesses. Fact. If you don't believe that, great. I really don't care.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?Oh yeah. The queers that enter a Christian business have no idea the owner is a Christian that will refuse to put a message endorsing queer marriage on their cake, huh. Excuse me, my unicorn is double parked.
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
It's not a matter of "playing dumb." You are still trying to dump the responsibility on the general public when it is the responsibility of the proprietor, who is responsible for the business and its advertising. No one in the general public is, or should be, responsible for looking out for them when they maintain an establishment that supposedly is open for business. No person, straight or LGBT, has any responsibility to watch out for them or to disappear quietly to hush up their actions.
Even if you were correct that a consumer must research every business s/he might want to patronize (which you are not), have the advertisements run by these establishments ever included the owner's limitations. I've never seen it. I once looked up a wedding venue that was cited for refusing a same-sex wedding. It advertised itself as (paraphrasing) the perfect place to hold one's special event, with no hint at all that this statement was misleading and it only accepted some events, so nothing would be learned by research anyway.
But anyway, you can't flip the responsibility on the general public.
Moreover, my opinion that allowing some people to dodge the law based on their personal beliefs would cause havoc in a 300 million plus society still stands. It is a ridiculous notion.
You don't seem to understand much. The rest of us don't care about your cult, either, except for its organized aggressive actions against the rest of us. The rest of us owe absolutely nothing to your cult.Queer Activists target Christian businesses. Fact. If you don't believe that, great. I really don't care.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.How does any shopper know that the proprietor is a member of one of these cults?
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
It's not a matter of "playing dumb." You are still trying to dump the responsibility on the general public when it is the responsibility of the proprietor, who is responsible for the business and its advertising. No one in the general public is, or should be, responsible for looking out for them when they maintain an establishment that supposedly is open for business. No person, straight or LGBT, has any responsibility to watch out for them or to disappear quietly to hush up their actions.
Even if you were correct that a consumer must research every business s/he might want to patronize (which you are not), have the advertisements run by these establishments ever included the owner's limitations. I've never seen it. I once looked up a wedding venue that was cited for refusing a same-sex wedding. It advertised itself as (paraphrasing) the perfect place to hold one's special event, with no hint at all that this statement was misleading and it only accepted some events, so nothing would be learned by research anyway.
But anyway, you can't flip the responsibility on the general public.
Moreover, my opinion that allowing some people to dodge the law based on their personal beliefs would cause havoc in a 300 million plus society still stands. It is a ridiculous notion.
In July of 2017, a local bridal shop in Pennsylvania received threatening voicemails from LGBT activists, after a same-sex couple was denied service because it violated the shop owners moral obligation to uphold Christian values. Similar organizations have fallen victim to the viciousness of the LGBT supposedly tolerant community. Posted on the Bridal shop’s Facebook page were two voicemails
Local Pennsylvania Bridal Shop Harassed and Threatened By LGBT Activists After Turning Away Same Sex Couple
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATING hate where there was none isn't it grand. wait until it all falls down around their superior attitudes and they're all knocked back down on their asses.
Then stop going to Christian businesses and do business with your own kind. No one is seeking your business.You don't seem to understand much. The rest of us don't care about your cult, either, except for its organized aggressive actions against the rest of us. The rest of us owe absolutely nothing to your cult.Queer Activists target Christian businesses. Fact. If you don't believe that, great. I really don't care.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Are you really this dense or just playing? Seriously.
Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
It's not a matter of "playing dumb." You are still trying to dump the responsibility on the general public when it is the responsibility of the proprietor, who is responsible for the business and its advertising. No one in the general public is, or should be, responsible for looking out for them when they maintain an establishment that supposedly is open for business. No person, straight or LGBT, has any responsibility to watch out for them or to disappear quietly to hush up their actions.
Even if you were correct that a consumer must research every business s/he might want to patronize (which you are not), have the advertisements run by these establishments ever included the owner's limitations. I've never seen it. I once looked up a wedding venue that was cited for refusing a same-sex wedding. It advertised itself as (paraphrasing) the perfect place to hold one's special event, with no hint at all that this statement was misleading and it only accepted some events, so nothing would be learned by research anyway.
But anyway, you can't flip the responsibility on the general public.
Moreover, my opinion that allowing some people to dodge the law based on their personal beliefs would cause havoc in a 300 million plus society still stands. It is a ridiculous notion.
Then stop going to Christian businesses and do business with your own kind. No one is seeking your business.You don't seem to understand much. The rest of us don't care about your cult, either, except for its organized aggressive actions against the rest of us. The rest of us owe absolutely nothing to your cult.Queer Activists target Christian businesses. Fact. If you don't believe that, great. I really don't care.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.Seriously, how does anyone know what, if any cult, a store proprietor is a member of? You have continually dodged this question. You are trying to put the onus on the public, where it does not belong? The public is not bound to research each emporium before visiting an establishment that supposedly is open to the public, and this research, in any event, could yield nothing as most of these establishments advertise that they welcome the public and hide their cult affiliations while inviting the public to walk through the door. The onus is on the store proprietor, who is bound by laws that apply to businesses.
It's not a matter of "playing dumb." You are still trying to dump the responsibility on the general public when it is the responsibility of the proprietor, who is responsible for the business and its advertising. No one in the general public is, or should be, responsible for looking out for them when they maintain an establishment that supposedly is open for business. No person, straight or LGBT, has any responsibility to watch out for them or to disappear quietly to hush up their actions.
Even if you were correct that a consumer must research every business s/he might want to patronize (which you are not), have the advertisements run by these establishments ever included the owner's limitations. I've never seen it. I once looked up a wedding venue that was cited for refusing a same-sex wedding. It advertised itself as (paraphrasing) the perfect place to hold one's special event, with no hint at all that this statement was misleading and it only accepted some events, so nothing would be learned by research anyway.
But anyway, you can't flip the responsibility on the general public.
Moreover, my opinion that allowing some people to dodge the law based on their personal beliefs would cause havoc in a 300 million plus society still stands. It is a ridiculous notion.
Queer activists do their research and target Christian businesses. If you think these lawsuits are a coincidence, then you're dumber than an empty box of Post Toasties.Then stop going to Christian businesses and do business with your own kind. No one is seeking your business.You don't seem to understand much. The rest of us don't care about your cult, either, except for its organized aggressive actions against the rest of us. The rest of us owe absolutely nothing to your cult.Queer Activists target Christian businesses. Fact. If you don't believe that, great. I really don't care.I can find out everything I want to know about any business owner. You're obviously playing dumb or really are dumb.
It's not a matter of "playing dumb." You are still trying to dump the responsibility on the general public when it is the responsibility of the proprietor, who is responsible for the business and its advertising. No one in the general public is, or should be, responsible for looking out for them when they maintain an establishment that supposedly is open for business. No person, straight or LGBT, has any responsibility to watch out for them or to disappear quietly to hush up their actions.
Even if you were correct that a consumer must research every business s/he might want to patronize (which you are not), have the advertisements run by these establishments ever included the owner's limitations. I've never seen it. I once looked up a wedding venue that was cited for refusing a same-sex wedding. It advertised itself as (paraphrasing) the perfect place to hold one's special event, with no hint at all that this statement was misleading and it only accepted some events, so nothing would be learned by research anyway.
But anyway, you can't flip the responsibility on the general public.
Moreover, my opinion that allowing some people to dodge the law based on their personal beliefs would cause havoc in a 300 million plus society still stands. It is a ridiculous notion.
Even if these people were to be granted a special right to discriminate in our huge society, which is not possible, you never answered as to how the public would know a shopkeeper's sect affiliation.
Our "own kind" is humanity. I'm heterosexual, but I try not to patronize any business that discriminates. This is a matter of right and wrong. I can't tell you where in the world you can go and set up the insular separatist community that you wish for. Try an island somewhere.
Modest people should not have to rewrite the Bible in order to appease a select group of individuals who wish to live according to their own values and opinions. A bar isn't free to build next to a school, and yet that is indeed a form of discrimination. Not inviting everyone to one's party is another form of discrimination and yet individuals do it all the time. ALL forms of behavior are not equally productive. Businesses generally do not have a monopoly. There is no reason to treat them as though they do!That the xian cult stigmatizes gays as immoral is immoral, and nazism is morality itself, a case against which is futile.
That the gay cult stigmatizes Christians and Muslims as immoral is immoral.That the xian cult stigmatizes gays as immoral is immoral, and nazism is morality itself, a case against which is futile.
Good point. He would be shunned because he is a republican? Would they be able to legally shun him if he was a gay republican?Something that has gone unmentioned throughout this entire discussion is the fact of Trump supporters being denied service at restaurants and businesses. I did a Google search and got a number of hits on four or five prominent cases. I was wondering if any of those criticizing the bridal shop owner had anything to say about this.