Looking forward to the gorsuch hearings

[basquebromance]

"There's no such thing as a Republican judge or a Democrat judge" is the first big howler said by Gorsuch at this hearing.

 

[hadit]

Just in: Sen Blumenthal says he's prepared to filibuster and "use every tool" to stop Gorsuch confirmation.

Wow, what a shocker. No one saw that one coming.

 

[basquebromance]

"Justice Scalia reminded us that words matter. The judge's job is to follow the words that are in the law, not replace with those that aren't" - Lyin Ted Cruz

 

[NYcarbineer]

The antics of Trump's administration thus far have lowered the expectations so much for anything coming out of that clown car that anything short of Gorsuch climbing up on the desk, dropping his pants, and taking a dump

is going to look brilliant.

 

[yiostheoy]

Day #1 where they all give their own speeches and where Gorsuch gets to give his is now over.

Day #2 is now beginning with the DEM's attacking in full force.

 

[yiostheoy]

The antics of Trump's administration thus far have lowered the expectations so much for anything coming out of that clown that anything short of Gorsuch climbing up on the desk, dropping his pants, and taking a dump

is going to look brilliant.

Even THAT would still look brilliant by comparison, actually.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

Hey Kreskin, how do you know Gorsuch will 'uphold the Constitution'? Your postings have proven you have no clue as to what that would entail.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The antics of Trump's administration thus far have lowered the expectations so much for anything coming out of that clown that anything short of Gorsuch climbing up on the desk, dropping his pants, and taking a dump

is going to look brilliant.

Even THAT would still look brilliant by comparison, actually.

You got me there. At least it would have a component of honesty to it.

 

[yiostheoy]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

Hey Kreskin, how do you know Gorsuch will 'uphold the Constitution'? Your postings have proven you have no clue as to what that would entail.

So far it seems that Gorsuch can't keep his religion separate from his rulings.

That's the only thing I have seen so far that I don't like.

And I have not heard much about his gun views on 2A. That's about the only thing I care about -- the right to be safe in a very dangerous crime ridden society.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Schumer voted for Gorsuch before. All the democrats did. Now Feinstein says that an originalist will never be allowed on the Supreme Court.

 

[Avatar4321]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

That would be a John Birch child's rendition of what is going to happen starting today.

Do you brainwash your kids with phrases like this?

On a little more sophisticated level, Schumer and the DEM's need to ask whether now is a good time to be obstructionist or not.

The reason there is a question at all on this is because Gorsuch -- a likely swing voter -- is replacing Scalia -- a very strict constructionist voter on the High Court. In other words the DEM's are replacing a far right former voter with a swing voter -- they win something.

The DEM's may want to wait to be obstructionist until later when Kennedy retires (who is a swing voter) or when Ginsberg retires (who is a far out activist jurist).

Do you get the real picture yet here Avatar4321 .

Or is your brain still stuck in John Birch Preschool ???

Oh I completely agree that would.be the prudent move by the democrats but the base doesn't care. They want blood

 

[yiostheoy]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

That would be a John Birch child's rendition of what is going to happen starting today.

Do you brainwash your kids with phrases like this?

On a little more sophisticated level, Schumer and the DEM's need to ask whether now is a good time to be obstructionist or not.

The reason there is a question at all on this is because Gorsuch -- a likely swing voter -- is replacing Scalia -- a very strict constructionist voter on the High Court. In other words the DEM's are replacing a far right former voter with a swing voter -- they win something.

The DEM's may want to wait to be obstructionist until later when Kennedy retires (who is a swing voter) or when Ginsberg retires (who is a far out activist jurist).

Do you get the real picture yet here Avatar4321 .

Or is your brain still stuck in John Birch Preschool ???

Oh I completely agree that would.be the prudent move by the democrats but the base doesn't care. They want blood

Good I'm glad you agree.

Schumer can cause a ruckus now or later.

Either way it won't do him any good.

Unless Gorsuch's ultra-Christian (hybrid Catholic/Episcopalian) leanings offend any of the GOP then he is a shoe-in for sure, at least under the nuclear option with a majority of GOP senators.

But if he can't even get 50, then he will be dog meat.

Gorsuch's biggest weakness is God.

He has been brainwashed about God.

 

[yiostheoy]

Schumer voted for Gorsuch before. All the democrats did. Now Feinstein says that an originalist will never be allowed on the Supreme Court.

Feinstein is so fokked up that she does not even realize she is walking around with 3 dildo's stuck inside her at all times -- one into every orifice she has.

 

[Avatar4321]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

Hey Kreskin, how do you know Gorsuch will 'uphold the Constitution'? Your postings have proven you have no clue as to what that would entail.

A decade of court decisions

 

[Avatar4321]

Schumer voted for Gorsuch before. All the democrats did. Now Feinstein says that an originalist will never be allowed on the Supreme Court.

Does she realize alito and Thomas are already on the court?

 

[Avatar4321]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

That would be a John Birch child's rendition of what is going to happen starting today.

Do you brainwash your kids with phrases like this?

On a little more sophisticated level, Schumer and the DEM's need to ask whether now is a good time to be obstructionist or not.

The reason there is a question at all on this is because Gorsuch -- a likely swing voter -- is replacing Scalia -- a very strict constructionist voter on the High Court. In other words the DEM's are replacing a far right former voter with a swing voter -- they win something.

The DEM's may want to wait to be obstructionist until later when Kennedy retires (who is a swing voter) or when Ginsberg retires (who is a far out activist jurist).

Do you get the real picture yet here Avatar4321 .

Or is your brain still stuck in John Birch Preschool ???

Oh I completely agree that would.be the prudent move by the democrats but the base doesn't care. They want blood

Good I'm glad you agree.

Schumer can cause a ruckus now or later.

Either way it won't do him any good.

Unless Gorsuch's ultra-Christian (hybrid Catholic/Episcopalian) leanings offend any of the GOP then he is a shoe-in for sure, at least under the nuclear option with a majority of GOP senators.

But if he can't even get 50, then he will be dog meat.

Gorsuch's biggest weakness is God.

He has been brainwashed about God.

Faith in God is never a weakness

 

[basquebromance]

Gorsuch destroyed Sen. Feinstein with his aw-shucks kindly patience

 

[yiostheoy]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

That would be a John Birch child's rendition of what is going to happen starting today.

Do you brainwash your kids with phrases like this?

On a little more sophisticated level, Schumer and the DEM's need to ask whether now is a good time to be obstructionist or not.

The reason there is a question at all on this is because Gorsuch -- a likely swing voter -- is replacing Scalia -- a very strict constructionist voter on the High Court. In other words the DEM's are replacing a far right former voter with a swing voter -- they win something.

The DEM's may want to wait to be obstructionist until later when Kennedy retires (who is a swing voter) or when Ginsberg retires (who is a far out activist jurist).

Do you get the real picture yet here Avatar4321 .

Or is your brain still stuck in John Birch Preschool ???

Oh I completely agree that would.be the prudent move by the democrats but the base doesn't care. They want blood

Good I'm glad you agree.

Schumer can cause a ruckus now or later.

Either way it won't do him any good.

Unless Gorsuch's ultra-Christian (hybrid Catholic/Episcopalian) leanings offend any of the GOP then he is a shoe-in for sure, at least under the nuclear option with a majority of GOP senators.

But if he can't even get 50, then he will be dog meat.

Gorsuch's biggest weakness is God.

He has been brainwashed about God.

Faith in God is never a weakness

As the original Freemasons tried to teach everyone (remember your temple ceremony comes from the Freemasons courtesy Jos. and Brig.), religion is personal and should be kept out of politics and public office.

 

[basquebromance]

Chuck "The Clown" Schumer calls for delay of Gorsuch vote until Russian probe is over.

 

[Borillar]

We ha a nominee that will uphold the constitution and watching the people on twitter flipping out over it should be fun. Democrats will either try to filibuster and lose or dem senators in red states will jump ship to try to win reelection in 2018.

Either way america wins and we get an excellent judge on the court

Looks like he isn't a religious reich idealogue the right was hoping for. He considers Roe v Wade precedent. Sounds like another Kennedy or Roberts rather than a Scalia or uncle Thomas. OK with me.