Oh, I walked right into your trap. Just like when you claimed there was no such thing as a perjury trap.
I’m dumb yet you can’t produce one quote to back up your bullshit. Haha.
Come on Slade, Comey went around the incoming administration and admitted "because I could GET AWAY with it." He was not investigating a crime and, from FBI internal memos they were trying to get him to lie. If that is not a trap, I don't know what is. Normally, the cops have evidence of a crime in an interrogation. Comey had a fake Dossier and a legal conversation Flynn had with Kysliak. That's it!!! Scant proof of any crime and certainly no reason to grill an innocent man like a murder suspect and pretend it's just friendly conversation. Beyond that, suggesting that the interview would 'go quicker' without a lawyer was a concerted effort to get him to say things he ordinarily would not say without his council present. Now can you please stop sqawking out the same ridiculous DNC talking point garbage? It's getting tedious and boring. Time to move on bud.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.www.politico.com
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
So of course you in the space of this single post have denied you ever lied about the existence of such a thing as a perjury trap (lie). You denied such a thing exists.
Leo you can call it a trap if you want but it is a disingenuous term used to degrade and vilify what is standard practice in law enforcement. If you think there is something improper for cops to ask questions they know the answer to to see if the subject is being honest or not then I don’t know what to tell ya. Flynn made the decision to lie. You seem to be totally fine with it and even make excuses for him. The FBI has much more than a fake dossier. For starters elements of the dossier were corroborated in the muller report. There was also evidence of contacts between Russia and Trumps campaign and the Trump people lying to the public about them. When people lie they are suspect. To investigates is totally warranted. Now what, if anything, about what I just said is not trueCome on Slade, Comey went around the incoming administration and admitted "because I could GET AWAY with it." He was not investigating a crime and, from FBI internal memos they were trying to get him to lie. If that is not a trap, I don't know what is. Normally, the cops have evidence of a crime in an interrogation. Comey had a fake Dossier and a legal conversation Flynn had with Kysliak. That's it!!! Scant proof of any crime and certainly no reason to grill an innocent man like a murder suspect and pretend it's just friendly conversation. Beyond that, suggesting that the interview would 'go quicker' without a lawyer was a concerted effort to get him to say things he ordinarily would not say without his council present. Now can you please stop sqawking out the same ridiculous DNC talking point garbage? It's getting tedious and boring. Time to move on bud.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
I was denying the existence of a trap in the context that you all were implying it was. Of course the term Perjury Trap exists. It would be stupid to argue otherwise. I guess I really need to dumb these things down for you because everything seems to go right over your head
NO! You just flatly denied such a thing existed until I got a citation and proved otherwise. Fuckin' coward.
Yeah, it sure would be dumb, shit for brains! Why did you deny such a common prosecutorial practice existed?
I guess you need to grow a pair of balls and take responsibility for your ignorance without trying
It is NOT standard law enforcement to try to trap a witness into lying. If the Cops suspect a CRIME then they advise of RIGHTS to have a lawyer present but, in this case, they advised the OPPOSITE. That is certainly NOT standard law enforcement in any way shape or form. I understand you can pick pieces out of the story and cloak yourself in the law but that in itself is disingenuous. Flynn committed no crime by all evidence and also, was not advised of the exculpatory evidence that 2 agents said Flynn was being truthful. Basically they convinced him to say he was lying so he could plea. He had already exhausted his funds, lost his house and they were threatening his son. That is NOT how law enforcement, if it is going by ethical standards, works.Leo you can call it a trap if you want but it is a disingenuous term used to degrade and vilify what is standard practice in law enforcement. If you think there is something improper for cops to ask questions they know the answer to to see if the subject is being honest or not then I don’t know what to tell ya. Flynn made the decision to lie. You seem to be totally fine with it and even make excuses for him. The FBI has much more than a fake dossier. For starters elements of the dossier were corroborated in the muller report. There was also evidence of contacts between Russia and Trumps campaign and the Trump people lying to the public about them. When people lie they are suspect. To investigates is totally warranted. Now what, if anything, about what I just said is not trueCome on Slade, Comey went around the incoming administration and admitted "because I could GET AWAY with it." He was not investigating a crime and, from FBI internal memos they were trying to get him to lie. If that is not a trap, I don't know what is. Normally, the cops have evidence of a crime in an interrogation. Comey had a fake Dossier and a legal conversation Flynn had with Kysliak. That's it!!! Scant proof of any crime and certainly no reason to grill an innocent man like a murder suspect and pretend it's just friendly conversation. Beyond that, suggesting that the interview would 'go quicker' without a lawyer was a concerted effort to get him to say things he ordinarily would not say without his council present. Now can you please stop sqawking out the same ridiculous DNC talking point garbage? It's getting tedious and boring. Time to move on bud.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
No, you need to stop with you myopic view of what happened and stop ignoring other exculpatory evidence. I certainly hope you are not a lawyer.
I did. And I found this.
The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to Obstruct Obama | TIME.com
TIME just published “The Party of No,” an article adapted from my new book, The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era. It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whi...swampland.time.com
Do you not understand that there is a HUGE gulf between obstructing a president, and trying to ILLEGALLY remove one from office? C'mon Coyote. You are not dumb. You are smart, but there is NO equivalency here. One groups actions were LEGAL. The other groups actions, were not.
Do you have a link for that - illegally trying to remove him from office? The only thing I can find is that a CA Dem candidate started a super pac called "Impeach Trump".
BEFORE Trump was elected the FBI was spying on his campaign. ILLEGALLY. You tell me.
Actually, according to Horowitz's report it wasn't illegal, there was sufficient reason for it.
Are you saying that is the basis of the claim that the Dems were plotting to remove Trump?
There was? What, prey tell. The ILLEGALLY obtained steele dossier? Get real.
There was nothing illegal about how the dossier was obtained. Also, it wasn't the only evidence backing up the investigation. So ya, I believe Horowitz, unlike either of us he would have seen all the information.
But back to the question - you said that the Dems were plotting to overthrow Trump before his inauguration - what is that based on?
They didn’t have evidence to arrest Flynn they just knew he was lying about contacts with Russian. Remember he lied to pence who in turn lied to the American people which resulted in Flynn being fired. So when somebody is lying they are suspect... why are they lying?It is NOT standard law enforcement to try to trap a witness into lying. If the Cops suspect a CRIME then they advise of RIGHTS to have a lawyer present but, in this case, they advised the OPPOSITE. That is certainly NOT standard law enforcement in any way shape or form. I understand you can pick pieces out of the story and cloak yourself in the law but that in itself is disingenuous. Flynn committed no crime by all evidence and also, was not advised of the exculpatory evidence that 2 agents said Flynn was being truthful. Basically they convinced him to say he was lying so he could plea. He had already exhausted his funds, lost his house and they were threatening his son. That is NOT how law enforcement, if it is going by ethical standards, works.Leo you can call it a trap if you want but it is a disingenuous term used to degrade and vilify what is standard practice in law enforcement. If you think there is something improper for cops to ask questions they know the answer to to see if the subject is being honest or not then I don’t know what to tell ya. Flynn made the decision to lie. You seem to be totally fine with it and even make excuses for him. The FBI has much more than a fake dossier. For starters elements of the dossier were corroborated in the muller report. There was also evidence of contacts between Russia and Trumps campaign and the Trump people lying to the public about them. When people lie they are suspect. To investigates is totally warranted. Now what, if anything, about what I just said is not trueCome on Slade, Comey went around the incoming administration and admitted "because I could GET AWAY with it." He was not investigating a crime and, from FBI internal memos they were trying to get him to lie. If that is not a trap, I don't know what is. Normally, the cops have evidence of a crime in an interrogation. Comey had a fake Dossier and a legal conversation Flynn had with Kysliak. That's it!!! Scant proof of any crime and certainly no reason to grill an innocent man like a murder suspect and pretend it's just friendly conversation. Beyond that, suggesting that the interview would 'go quicker' without a lawyer was a concerted effort to get him to say things he ordinarily would not say without his council present. Now can you please stop sqawking out the same ridiculous DNC talking point garbage? It's getting tedious and boring. Time to move on bud.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
Oh? Who authorized Flynn to discuss Obama's sanctions with Russia?Before becoming the NSA, he was just a citizen with no authority to act on behalf of the USA's government.So? Before becoming the NSA, he was just a citizen with no authority to act on behalf of the USA's government. He did so anyway. The FBI was right to investigate the matter.Sure there was. To get additional information about why he was talking to a Russian ambassador and who authorized him to do so.They chose to interview him. Nothing wrong with that.Because it could have been a violation of the Logan Act.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
That’s what cops do during investigations.
Why were the cops investigating that phone call?
They should have charged him, they had the transcript.
Zero need for an interview.
And no good reason for it either.
To get additional information about why he was talking to a Russian ambassador and who authorized him to do so.
He's the incoming NSA.
It's perfectly legal for members of an incoming administration to contact foreign governments.
The FBI was right to investigate the matter.
They investigated.
A week after the call they found no derogatory info and were going to drop the case.
No problem! I’d be happy to do that as I’ve spent most my time in this thread filling in the missing piece that you all are leaving out in your narrative.
Oh? Who authorized Flynn to discuss Obama's sanctions with Russia?Before becoming the NSA, he was just a citizen with no authority to act on behalf of the USA's government.So? Before becoming the NSA, he was just a citizen with no authority to act on behalf of the USA's government. He did so anyway. The FBI was right to investigate the matter.Sure there was. To get additional information about why he was talking to a Russian ambassador and who authorized him to do so.They chose to interview him. Nothing wrong with that.Because it could have been a violation of the Logan Act.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
That’s what cops do during investigations.
Why were the cops investigating that phone call?
They should have charged him, they had the transcript.
Zero need for an interview.
And no good reason for it either.
To get additional information about why he was talking to a Russian ambassador and who authorized him to do so.
He's the incoming NSA.
It's perfectly legal for members of an incoming administration to contact foreign governments.
The FBI was right to investigate the matter.
They investigated.
A week after the call they found no derogatory info and were going to drop the case.
You have not done any of that. You purpsel
OK Slade......Here are a few missing pieces you might want to address.
justthenews.com
That's called "entrapment" and it's illegal. A burglar would be released if arrested because you, under
Nope! Unless these cops weren't just witnessing a criminal gang or enterprise but actively
Again, why were they curious or who was it that was directing them that was curious ?Sure there was. To get additional information about why he was talking to a Russian ambassador and who authorized him to do so.They chose to interview him. Nothing wrong with that.Because it could have been a violation of the Logan Act.It’s not a trap! That’s a buzz word you keep using. Flynn knew his rights, he knew he could have a lawyer and he knew lying was a crime.... he did it anyways, nobody forced him. Of course the cops would rather there not be an attorney present, and of course they would like to exposed a lie or admission to used against Flynn. That’s what cops do during investigations. Do you have any clue how law enforcement works?Why did they discourage him from having council by saying the interview would go quicker? The only reason for that is to try to set up a trap. Why did they not afford him the same consideration as anyone else? Why was exculpatory evidence withheld at the trial? Do you just follow like a sheep to slaughter as long as your TDS is satisfied? What was the crime they were investigating?Ok let’s get very specific here. The agents said they offered him council but said it would slow things down. That’s is the absolute truth isn’t it? Is anything in that statement a lie?No, you're lying, "Comey also says officials told Flynn the interview would be faster without one." You did not tell the whole truth you just spewed half-assed propaganda with no regard at all to the facts at the time.Dude you lie in your first sentence. They told him he could bring a lawyer. That’s a fact, stop acting like they tricked him, stop lying! Flynn said in court that the FBI did not trap him and he knew the consequences of lying. Jesus Christ. Stop spreading fake shit! Flynn lied by choice not by force. He has a history of it. The FBI tried and leverage that lie to get as much info as they could. You may think they pushed to hard... that’s fine, we can have that debate. But come back to fucking earth.I have already refuted what you posted. You keep parroting the same media talking points. There was a concerted effort to get rid of Flynn. The FBI did not use protocol when interviewing Flynn, they told him he did not need a lawyer, they pretended it was just a chat, did not offer his Miranda rights and memos have surfaced they were trying to get him to lie about information they already had. Also Obama was in on it. Now, you say none of that is a big deal but given everything that the Democrats have tried, it fits right in with with their conspiracy to unseat Trump. You had a US Representative (Adam Schiff) reading what he purported to be a transcript of Trump's Ukraine call and outright lying about what was said. You had Shumer and Pelosi declaring that Trump was 'unfit'......Also Obama fired Flynn for coming down hard on radical Muslims. What was he doing wanting to be 'in the loop' in the FBI's 'Razor' scheme? Flynn did noting wrong and was representing the new administration and to powerful Democrats that was enough to set him up. The FBI had no cause to investigate him they just wanted him out of the way.Yes I agree not everything is anything. So why are you wasting time trying to say I’m parroting lies from the media? How about you just stick the the things I say and refute what you can if you canNo one called 'everything a lie' that is an irresponsible blanket statement. The same kind of statement the lamestream media makes and you're here squawking out the same shit.I don’t parrot shit, I call it like I see it... I can’t help it if trump and his puppets call everything a lie.The leftist shit 'bag' media says the same things you do. The same shit bag media that follows liars like Hillary, Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi and any other TDS politician and that parrots them. You parrot THOSE bags of shit.if the media says the same stuff that im sayIng then that stuff is accurate. The media is mixed bag of accurate, hyperbolic and dishonest reporting.That makes bo senseOk so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
Really? One would not know you thought the media was dishonest because your posts parrot what they say about Trump. The fact that Trump holds then to account IS rising above their distortions and lies.The media have always been dishonest turfs. It’s not that hard to stay out of that vortex. Either way, our leaders should rise above, not stoop down to their level or in Trumps case... go below. It’s an embarrassmentIf you could just shut the media's mouth, and stop the leaks, the case may have stood, but the get Trump threats by the media in their gotcha now bullcrap (revealing methods and traps), just keeps backfiring and backfiring. Any day now.. rotflmbo.Ok so per your link this is what you are whining about?That's wishful bull shit! Perjury trap - Wikipedia
The principle is well known...to everyone but you.
The FBI was perfectly aware they were entrapping Flynn and had to be careful about it.
Documents show FBI debated how to handle investigation of Michael Flynn
The four pages reflect bureau brainstorming about how to approach the Trump adviser’s contacts with the Russian ambassador.
“A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial strategy, which is sometimes claimed to be prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Courts on state and federal levels almost never recognize such as inappropriate, doing so would in essence, condone perjury.”
"In court documents filed Thursday, the Justice Department said that after reviewing newly disclosed information and other materials, it agreed with Flynn’s lawyers that his interview with the FBI should never have taken place. His contacts with the Russian ambassador were “entirely appropriate” and the interview “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis,” the department said. "
"Flynn in his filing claimed that “I never would have pled guilty” if his first set of lawyers had told him that FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."
"Instead, Flynn said that “I tried to ‘accept responsibility’ by admitting to offenses I understood the government I love and trusted said I committed.”
You are dead wrong, the facts do not support what you claim. Flynn committed no crime in talking to Kysliak. Exculpatory evidence was withheld at his trial. It was a set up pure and simple. Those in the FBI should be held responsible for a miscarriage of justice.
That’s what cops do during investigations.
Why were the cops investigating that phone call?
They should have charged him, they had the transcript.
Zero need for an interview.
And no good reason for it either.
You're talking in circles Todd, we’ve been through this. You’re point does not land. Cops can talk to people with whom they don’t have evidence of crimes
