An actual choice.
1.In the big picture, what stuff of yours is so valuable to you, that it is worth raising kids who believe that the only things that count are race, class and gender?
âTeacher union leader says âwhite supremacyâ fuels reopening efforts, concerns over lockdown suicides are âwhite privilegeââ Teacher union leader says 'white supremacy' fuels reopening efforts, concerns over lockdown suicides are 'white privilege' - Conservative News Outlet
If the government school system is your choice, you are bequeathing to your kids that mantra, ârace, class, and gender,â over knowledge, the ability to reason, and the exceptionalism of America.
2. The basis of the thread title is that many have come to accept that two earners are necessary to succeed. And, the economics of modern life may indicate that. But consider the reason: government is your partner in fully half of what you earn: taxes, fees, licenses, fines, âŚ.add âem all up: itâs the half of your income that youâd have if only one parent went to work, and the other raised the kids: not the school system.
You wouldnât have to give up those material things that you are choosing over raising and educating your children if half of your income wasn't being stolen in the vote-buying scheme.
3. Who to blame? Which is the âtax and spendâ party?
âBut he did identify what he called âtactical lessons.â He let himself look too much like âthe same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.â Education of a President (Published 2010)
Sometimes, they let on:
"Dan Rostenkowski, standing next to the candidate in front of the cameras and the cheering crowd at the convention after the fateful speech, whispered to Mondale, "You've got a lot of balls, pal." According to Rostenkowski, Mondale whispered back, "Look at 'em, we're going to tax their ass off."
"Showdown At Gucci Gulch," Jeffrey H. Birnbaum And Alan S. Murray, page 35
4. Shouldnât it be the parentâs choice, nay, obligation, to determine what sort of outlook, worldview, their progeny have? Or is it the prerogative of governmentâŚ. âexpertsâ on your children.
What if the stark choice is between these two poles:
âCultural Marxism, though itâs dismissed by critics as a âterm invented by the Rightâ, âwas an undeniable school of thought taking Marxist categories of oppressed and oppressor beyond the economic realm and applying to it other forms of oppression: gender, race, sexuality.â Caldron Pool
I tend toward this view
On Wednesday, June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed. In The Meaning of Everything, Simon Winchester discusses the English of the time as follows:
âThe English establishment of the day might be rightly derided at this remove as having been class-ridden and imperialist, bombastic and blimpish, racist and insouciant- but it was marked undeniably also by a sweeping erudition and confidence, and it was peopled by men and women who felt they were able to know all, to understand much, and in consequence to radiate the wisdom of deep learning.â
5. Are there material possession that are more valuable to you than the investment in your children?
Bet you can't name any.
So why are you behaving as though there were?
1.In the big picture, what stuff of yours is so valuable to you, that it is worth raising kids who believe that the only things that count are race, class and gender?
âTeacher union leader says âwhite supremacyâ fuels reopening efforts, concerns over lockdown suicides are âwhite privilegeââ Teacher union leader says 'white supremacy' fuels reopening efforts, concerns over lockdown suicides are 'white privilege' - Conservative News Outlet
If the government school system is your choice, you are bequeathing to your kids that mantra, ârace, class, and gender,â over knowledge, the ability to reason, and the exceptionalism of America.
2. The basis of the thread title is that many have come to accept that two earners are necessary to succeed. And, the economics of modern life may indicate that. But consider the reason: government is your partner in fully half of what you earn: taxes, fees, licenses, fines, âŚ.add âem all up: itâs the half of your income that youâd have if only one parent went to work, and the other raised the kids: not the school system.
You wouldnât have to give up those material things that you are choosing over raising and educating your children if half of your income wasn't being stolen in the vote-buying scheme.
3. Who to blame? Which is the âtax and spendâ party?
âBut he did identify what he called âtactical lessons.â He let himself look too much like âthe same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.â Education of a President (Published 2010)
Sometimes, they let on:
"Dan Rostenkowski, standing next to the candidate in front of the cameras and the cheering crowd at the convention after the fateful speech, whispered to Mondale, "You've got a lot of balls, pal." According to Rostenkowski, Mondale whispered back, "Look at 'em, we're going to tax their ass off."
"Showdown At Gucci Gulch," Jeffrey H. Birnbaum And Alan S. Murray, page 35
4. Shouldnât it be the parentâs choice, nay, obligation, to determine what sort of outlook, worldview, their progeny have? Or is it the prerogative of governmentâŚ. âexpertsâ on your children.
What if the stark choice is between these two poles:
âCultural Marxism, though itâs dismissed by critics as a âterm invented by the Rightâ, âwas an undeniable school of thought taking Marxist categories of oppressed and oppressor beyond the economic realm and applying to it other forms of oppression: gender, race, sexuality.â Caldron Pool
I tend toward this view
On Wednesday, June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed. In The Meaning of Everything, Simon Winchester discusses the English of the time as follows:
âThe English establishment of the day might be rightly derided at this remove as having been class-ridden and imperialist, bombastic and blimpish, racist and insouciant- but it was marked undeniably also by a sweeping erudition and confidence, and it was peopled by men and women who felt they were able to know all, to understand much, and in consequence to radiate the wisdom of deep learning.â
5. Are there material possession that are more valuable to you than the investment in your children?
Bet you can't name any.
So why are you behaving as though there were?