Make Feinstein "Prove" She Didn't Leak The Letter

[Skylar]

I think the staff leaked the letter with her knowledge. It was a highly unethical thing to do.

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Thats not a witness you moron!!!
Thats an accuser that has no evidence to back up her "story".

 

[Skylar]

So the OP has failed gloriously to meet the Kavanaugh hearing standards of a witness.

Anyone else wanna try?

 

[Doc1]

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

 

[B. Kidd]

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

I got probed by aliens many years ago. True story.

 

[Skylar]

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

 

[Doc1]

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

I got probed by aliens many years ago. True story.

She "probed" another woman in HS. True story.

 

[Skylar]

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

I got probed by aliens many years ago. True story.

Huh.

Well you enjoy your probe. And come back to us when you have an eye witness that Feinstein leaked the letter.

 

[Doc1]

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

Pssst, you're a partisan twit. I was told you accosted a girl in High School, please prove you didn't.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Just like words aren't facts unless you have physical evidence to back them up.

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

So anyone can come along and claim they saw DiFi leak the letter and thats evidence?
Alright then.....I saw and heard her leak the letter.

 

[Skylar]

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

Pssst, you're a partisan twit. I was told you accosted a girl in High School, please prove you didn't.

Unless that 'girl' was Feinstein and she was leaking Ford's letter while she did it.....you're once again abandoning the premise of the thread.

It didn't take much to run you off.

 

[Doc1]

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

Pssst, you're a partisan twit. I was told you accosted a girl in High School, please prove you didn't.

Unless that 'girl' was Feinstein and she was leaking Ford's letter while she did it.....you're once again abandoning the premise of the thread.

It didn't take much to run you off.

Why did you accost the girl?

 

[Skylar]

Eye witness testimony is evidence in any court of law. And certainly in a Senate hearing.

As demonstrated elegantly by the investigation initiated after Ford's testimony. And Republicans opposing such an investigation before it.

What eyewitness?

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

So anyone can come along and claim they saw DiFi leak the letter and thats evidence?
Alright then.....I saw and heard her leak the letter.

If they're willing to testify under oath, you betcha.

When you've testified before the Senate, under oath, to that effect......come on back.

 

[Skylar]

That would be Christine Blasey Ford, giving a first hand, eye witness account of her experiences.

Any first hand account is an eye witness account.

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

Pssst, you're a partisan twit. I was told you accosted a girl in High School, please prove you didn't.

Unless that 'girl' was Feinstein and she was leaking Ford's letter while she did it.....you're once again abandoning the premise of the thread.

It didn't take much to run you off.

Why did you accost the girl?

When you're willing to discuss the thread, I'll be here. Until then, keep running.

 

[Thinker101]

I think the staff leaked the letter with her knowledge. It was a highly unethical thing to do.

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Says the liberal supporting the good Doctor that has NO EVIDENCE.

Ford's testimony is evidence. As demonstrated as the Republicans fighting an FBI investigation before her testimony. And calling for one after.

Sure, the testimony that she can't recall when it happened, where it happened, how she got there and how she got home, but knows she only had one beer.

 

[Doc1]

Of course it is, proven or not. Well, if you're a Lefty anyway.

Eye witness accounts are certainly evidence.

Now you try: Where is the eye witness account of Feinstein leaking the letter?

(Psst.....that's your cue to abandon the premise of the thread again).

Pssst, you're a partisan twit. I was told you accosted a girl in High School, please prove you didn't.

Unless that 'girl' was Feinstein and she was leaking Ford's letter while she did it.....you're once again abandoning the premise of the thread.

It didn't take much to run you off.

Why did you accost the girl?

When you're willing to discuss the thread, I'll be here. Until then, keep running.

Did she like it? According to my sources she didn't.

 

[Skylar]

I think the staff leaked the letter with her knowledge. It was a highly unethical thing to do.

That would mean she told them to do it.
In essence she did it.

Alas, there's no evidence that Feinstein leaked the letter. Remember, Toro is citing his opinion. The OP is citing his imagination.

Feelings aren't facts, guys. Despite what the Echo Chamber might tell you.

Says the liberal supporting the good Doctor that has NO EVIDENCE.

Ford's testimony is evidence. As demonstrated as the Republicans fighting an FBI investigation before her testimony. And calling for one after.

Sure, the testimony that she can't recall when it happened, where it happened, how she got there and how she got home, but knows she only had one beer.

Her testimony involves a fair bit more than that. She was certain she was attacked, by whom, and how. She gave a detailed descriptoin of her assault and the attempted forcible rape. All under oath. And very credibly.

Thus, the FBI investigation.

So where is your witness that Feinstein leaked the letter?

 

[B. Kidd]

Skypilot gonna need a therapist if Kav gets confirmed.
Thank God I'm retired!

 

[rightwinger]

Let’s make Kavanaugh prove he is not a rapist

 

[Doc1]

Let’s make Kavanaugh prove he is not a rapist

let's make you prove you aren't.