Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement

t_polkow

Rookie
Mar 3, 2013
1,190
230
You won't find anyone willing to dare say it much in the media, but a good percentage of the white men who oppose gun control of any sort – and who back measures that would even allow alleged terrorists and straw purchases for drug dealers to buy guns – are just afraid that without their guns, their phallic power will be reduced to size.

You can feel at least temporarily reassured when a long-barreled assault weapon compensates for just another average manhood; it's an irresistable testosterone high to the beleaguered white male.

Call this Freudian psychobabble analysis, but when you add it into the mix of just angry white males who want their guns to show that they are still top dog on the political, social and marital hierarchy, you got a good percentage of the psychologically need gun owners. A gun, particularly assault weapons and lethal militarized handguns, are at least two things: a prosthetic dick and a sign that even unemployed white guys still rule the Western World and sit at the head of the kitchen table.

We're talking about a dying patriarchy making a last stand with the ownership and brandishing of weapons that provide the semblance of ultimate power over life and death.

Sure, there is the rapidly decreasing tradition and understandable ritual of hunting in rural areas, particularly for those who actually need the meat because of near poverty. And there are handgun target shooters who truly regard handguns as a sport -- which they are in some cases. But these white men are a minority in a culture war that causes even elected Democrats to tremble in fear at voting on a gun control measure, even a law that might aid police in apprehending criminals, but the gun lobby opposes it for some obscure reason to rally their supporters around.

Let's face it, the more white guys feel besieged by a multi-cultural society in which women and minorities have chewed away at their perch until it is about to crash to the ground and leave them equals among other humans, the more fierce and maniacal the opposition to regulating guns as dangerous instruments of death becomes.

That is to say that a gun, or multiple numbers of them (which is the trend per gun owner over the past few years), provides a sense of potency, a shot of dominance that allows one – in some states -- to walk around "open carry" with a handgun. "You see who I am," the handgun symbolizes, "I am of the white guy lineage that conquered the world from the heathens, that wears a 'white hat,' that has anchored civilization since the launch of European empires. This gun tells you one thing; don't mess with me."

Add this to the militia conspiratorialists, the gun profiteers (manufacturers and the whole chain of distribution including gun stores and gun shows), and the guys like NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre who are pulling in hefty salaries running high-octane incendiary and fanciful Alamo campaigns to incite virulent fear – and you got the beginnings of understanding why gun control never gets much past "go." In fact, except with the brief early Bill Clinton passage of the Assault Weapons Ban (flawed as it was and which sunset after 10 years), the nation has been moving incrementally backwards on gun policy.

Memories of gun massacres last a few months and fade away, but the psychological need of the white man for feeling sexually and politically powerful continues like a raging tsunami as progressives forget about the last mass shooting, the issue receding as a priority among the majority of the nation who support gun control.

On March 29 in the Washington Post, Charlotte Childress and Harriet Childress discussed the culpability of white male gun worshippers in regards to mass shootings (and that is only the most visible edge of the some 10,000 gun homicides each year in the US, in addition to countless gun injuries): :eusa_whistle:

Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and Profit
 
You won't find anyone willing to dare say it much in the media, but a good percentage of the white men who oppose gun control of any sort – and who back measures that would even allow alleged terrorists and straw purchases for drug dealers to buy guns – are just afraid that without their guns, their phallic power will be reduced to size.

You can feel at least temporarily reassured when a long-barreled assault weapon compensates for just another average manhood; it's an irresistable testosterone high to the beleaguered white male.

Call this Freudian psychobabble analysis, but when you add it into the mix of just angry white males who want their guns to show that they are still top dog on the political, social and marital hierarchy, you got a good percentage of the psychologically need gun owners. A gun, particularly assault weapons and lethal militarized handguns, are at least two things: a prosthetic dick and a sign that even unemployed white guys still rule the Western World and sit at the head of the kitchen table.

We're talking about a dying patriarchy making a last stand with the ownership and brandishing of weapons that provide the semblance of ultimate power over life and death.

Sure, there is the rapidly decreasing tradition and understandable ritual of hunting in rural areas, particularly for those who actually need the meat because of near poverty. And there are handgun target shooters who truly regard handguns as a sport -- which they are in some cases. But these white men are a minority in a culture war that causes even elected Democrats to tremble in fear at voting on a gun control measure, even a law that might aid police in apprehending criminals, but the gun lobby opposes it for some obscure reason to rally their supporters around.

Let's face it, the more white guys feel besieged by a multi-cultural society in which women and minorities have chewed away at their perch until it is about to crash to the ground and leave them equals among other humans, the more fierce and maniacal the opposition to regulating guns as dangerous instruments of death becomes.

That is to say that a gun, or multiple numbers of them (which is the trend per gun owner over the past few years), provides a sense of potency, a shot of dominance that allows one – in some states -- to walk around "open carry" with a handgun. "You see who I am," the handgun symbolizes, "I am of the white guy lineage that conquered the world from the heathens, that wears a 'white hat,' that has anchored civilization since the launch of European empires. This gun tells you one thing; don't mess with me."

Add this to the militia conspiratorialists, the gun profiteers (manufacturers and the whole chain of distribution including gun stores and gun shows), and the guys like NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre who are pulling in hefty salaries running high-octane incendiary and fanciful Alamo campaigns to incite virulent fear – and you got the beginnings of understanding why gun control never gets much past "go." In fact, except with the brief early Bill Clinton passage of the Assault Weapons Ban (flawed as it was and which sunset after 10 years), the nation has been moving incrementally backwards on gun policy.

Memories of gun massacres last a few months and fade away, but the psychological need of the white man for feeling sexually and politically powerful continues like a raging tsunami as progressives forget about the last mass shooting, the issue receding as a priority among the majority of the nation who support gun control.

On March 29 in the Washington Post, Charlotte Childress and Harriet Childress discussed the culpability of white male gun worshippers in regards to mass shootings (and that is only the most visible edge of the some 10,000 gun homicides each year in the US, in addition to countless gun injuries): :eusa_whistle:

Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and Profit

picard.jpg
 
It's all about being white. It's time the democrats did something about that. Like eliminate the white people.
 
I don't know why a lot of people on this board and in society and general think it is a good idea for mentally ill people to carry guns.

I'm not sure I'd say it is sexual inadequacy, but certainly I think it suggests issues with power and control.

On this board it tends to be the same people who also hanker for 1955 - an era when men could slap their wives around without fear of criticism, you could spit at black people if they got lippy and not have to worry about Mexicans taking your job. Not to mention drive a 10-cylinder car that did 5 gallons to the mile, throw household rubbish over the back fence, and enjoy a view of a nuclear reactor steaming atop a good old-fashioned fault line.

These days you can't as much as shoot some long-hair hippy without liberals getting uppity!
 
I don't know why a lot of people on this board and in society and general think it is a good idea for mentally ill people to carry guns.

I'm not sure I'd say it is sexual inadequacy, but certainly I think it suggests issues with power and control.

On this board it tends to be the same people who also hanker for 1955 - an era when men could slap their wives around without fear of criticism, you could spit at black people if they got lippy and not have to worry about Mexicans taking your job. Not to mention drive a 10-cylinder car that did 5 gallons to the mile, throw household rubbish over the back fence, and enjoy a view of a nuclear reactor steaming atop a good old-fashioned fault line.

These days you can't as much as shoot some long-hair hippy without liberals getting uppity!

[ame=http://youtu.be/5hfYJsQAhl0]Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult (Academic Decathlon)[Forum Weapon][How To Troll][Ignorance Is Bliss] - YouTube[/ame]
 
I don't know why a lot of people on this board and in society and general think it is a good idea for mentally ill people to carry guns.

I'm not sure I'd say it is sexual inadequacy, but certainly I think it suggests issues with power and control.

On this board it tends to be the same people who also hanker for 1955 - an era when men could slap their wives around without fear of criticism, you could spit at black people if they got lippy and not have to worry about Mexicans taking your job. Not to mention drive a 10-cylinder car that did 5 gallons to the mile, throw household rubbish over the back fence, and enjoy a view of a nuclear reactor steaming atop a good old-fashioned fault line.

These days you can't as much as shoot some long-hair hippy without liberals getting uppity!

Now, now, you're exaggerating. There were no ten cylinder American cars then.
 
I think you're painting this generalization with a far too large brush, t_.

And the Fruedian interpretation is of course, just over the top.

Sometimes, mate, an AR-15 is just an AR-15.
 
Liberals don't think white women have their own guns. They are trying to gin up sex wars in addition to class and race wars.
 
Men of all ages and races and cultures have long equated firearms with their manhood.

It's stupid, but it is what it is.

Considering some of the more stupid remarks above, what I found interesting was how many of the professional white women (that I knew of) went armed.
 
Last edited:
Liberals don't think white women have their own guns. They are trying to gin up sex wars in addition to class and race wars.

Which I always find Ironic because a firearm is the great equalizer between the sexes. With the exception of recoil (and that can be overcome with weapon selection) Using a firearm is completely gender neutral. There is no advantage except the one above a man usually has over a woman when it comes to proficiency with firearm.

Firearms allow women to overcome their usual disadvantage when it comes to strength, levelling the playing field.
 
Liberals don't think white women have their own guns. They are trying to gin up sex wars in addition to class and race wars.

Which I always find Ironic because a firearm is the great equalizer between the sexes. With the exception of recoil (and that can be overcome with weapon selection) Using a firearm is completely gender neutral. There is no advantage except the one above a man usually has over a woman when it comes to proficiency with firearm.

Firearms allow women to overcome their usual disadvantage when it comes to strength, levelling the playing field.

Guns are a great equalizer between age differences too.

Spokane Grandmother Of 10 Holds Burglar At Gunpoint At Her Home « CBS Seattle
Spokane police say a grandmother held a burglar at gunpoint at her home until authorities arrived.

KXLY-TV reports that Sandy Mize, a grandmother to 10, fired a warning shot and held the suspect, 35-year-old Sean Denny, in her living room until he tried to get away. That’s when authorities apprehended him in her backyard early Wednesday morning.

Democrats have to find something to say, so they make it up.
 
Many White Men Worship Guns?

I know a lot of white men. I've never seen a gun altar with little offering bowls in any of their homes. Nor have I ever seen a Church of the Holy High Capacity Magazine anywhere.
 
Last edited:
...a good percentage of the white men who oppose gun control of any sort – and who back measures that would even allow alleged terrorists and straw purchases for drug dealers to buy guns – are just afraid that without their guns, their phallic power will be reduced to size.

And you know about the relationship between firearm ownership and penis size how? Feel free to outline the specifics of your study, because it wasn't within the text of your rambling post.
 
I'm confused. I thought little red sports cars were the penile inadequacy indicator.
 
You won't find anyone willing to dare say it much in the media, but a good percentage of the white men who oppose gun control of any sort – and who back measures that would even allow alleged terrorists and straw purchases for drug dealers to buy guns – are just afraid that without their guns, their phallic power will be reduced to size.

You can feel at least temporarily reassured when a long-barreled assault weapon compensates for just another average manhood; it's an irresistable testosterone high to the beleaguered white male.

Call this Freudian psychobabble analysis, but when you add it into the mix of just angry white males who want their guns to show that they are still top dog on the political, social and marital hierarchy, you got a good percentage of the psychologically need gun owners. A gun, particularly assault weapons and lethal militarized handguns, are at least two things: a prosthetic dick and a sign that even unemployed white guys still rule the Western World and sit at the head of the kitchen table.

We're talking about a dying patriarchy making a last stand with the ownership and brandishing of weapons that provide the semblance of ultimate power over life and death.

Sure, there is the rapidly decreasing tradition and understandable ritual of hunting in rural areas, particularly for those who actually need the meat because of near poverty. And there are handgun target shooters who truly regard handguns as a sport -- which they are in some cases. But these white men are a minority in a culture war that causes even elected Democrats to tremble in fear at voting on a gun control measure, even a law that might aid police in apprehending criminals, but the gun lobby opposes it for some obscure reason to rally their supporters around.

Let's face it, the more white guys feel besieged by a multi-cultural society in which women and minorities have chewed away at their perch until it is about to crash to the ground and leave them equals among other humans, the more fierce and maniacal the opposition to regulating guns as dangerous instruments of death becomes.

That is to say that a gun, or multiple numbers of them (which is the trend per gun owner over the past few years), provides a sense of potency, a shot of dominance that allows one – in some states -- to walk around "open carry" with a handgun. "You see who I am," the handgun symbolizes, "I am of the white guy lineage that conquered the world from the heathens, that wears a 'white hat,' that has anchored civilization since the launch of European empires. This gun tells you one thing; don't mess with me."

Add this to the militia conspiratorialists, the gun profiteers (manufacturers and the whole chain of distribution including gun stores and gun shows), and the guys like NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre who are pulling in hefty salaries running high-octane incendiary and fanciful Alamo campaigns to incite virulent fear – and you got the beginnings of understanding why gun control never gets much past "go." In fact, except with the brief early Bill Clinton passage of the Assault Weapons Ban (flawed as it was and which sunset after 10 years), the nation has been moving incrementally backwards on gun policy.

Memories of gun massacres last a few months and fade away, but the psychological need of the white man for feeling sexually and politically powerful continues like a raging tsunami as progressives forget about the last mass shooting, the issue receding as a priority among the majority of the nation who support gun control.

On March 29 in the Washington Post, Charlotte Childress and Harriet Childress discussed the culpability of white male gun worshippers in regards to mass shootings (and that is only the most visible edge of the some 10,000 gun homicides each year in the US, in addition to countless gun injuries): :eusa_whistle:

Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and Profit

I have to say, OP, I pretty much agree with you completely, and being on this forum for a couple of months has confirmed this perspective for me in no uncertain terms. Most/many of those who are so vehemently and adamantly clinging to their guns, who are so loudly and virulently in opposition to any type of gun control, those are the ones on here who are clearly teetering between sanity and insanity. They are frightening people who demonstrate a true lack of vision and understanding of life and the world around them. And, they are mostly white men: most of them certainly are bare bones racists. One of them who I joked about in the respect of guns being a projection of his manhood, this guy, on here, actually stalked me and harassed me with repeated private messages telling me his wife would verifiy for me he was well endowed. I actually had to complain to the moderators to get him to stop. If this isn't someone who is insecure about his manhood, I don't know who is.
 
Last edited:
You won't find anyone willing to dare say it much in the media, but a good percentage of the white men who oppose gun control of any sort – and who back measures that would even allow alleged terrorists and straw purchases for drug dealers to buy guns – are just afraid that without their guns, their phallic power will be reduced to size.

You can feel at least temporarily reassured when a long-barreled assault weapon compensates for just another average manhood; it's an irresistable testosterone high to the beleaguered white male.

Call this Freudian psychobabble analysis, but when you add it into the mix of just angry white males who want their guns to show that they are still top dog on the political, social and marital hierarchy, you got a good percentage of the psychologically need gun owners. A gun, particularly assault weapons and lethal militarized handguns, are at least two things: a prosthetic dick and a sign that even unemployed white guys still rule the Western World and sit at the head of the kitchen table.

We're talking about a dying patriarchy making a last stand with the ownership and brandishing of weapons that provide the semblance of ultimate power over life and death.

Sure, there is the rapidly decreasing tradition and understandable ritual of hunting in rural areas, particularly for those who actually need the meat because of near poverty. And there are handgun target shooters who truly regard handguns as a sport -- which they are in some cases. But these white men are a minority in a culture war that causes even elected Democrats to tremble in fear at voting on a gun control measure, even a law that might aid police in apprehending criminals, but the gun lobby opposes it for some obscure reason to rally their supporters around.

Let's face it, the more white guys feel besieged by a multi-cultural society in which women and minorities have chewed away at their perch until it is about to crash to the ground and leave them equals among other humans, the more fierce and maniacal the opposition to regulating guns as dangerous instruments of death becomes.

That is to say that a gun, or multiple numbers of them (which is the trend per gun owner over the past few years), provides a sense of potency, a shot of dominance that allows one – in some states -- to walk around "open carry" with a handgun. "You see who I am," the handgun symbolizes, "I am of the white guy lineage that conquered the world from the heathens, that wears a 'white hat,' that has anchored civilization since the launch of European empires. This gun tells you one thing; don't mess with me."

Add this to the militia conspiratorialists, the gun profiteers (manufacturers and the whole chain of distribution including gun stores and gun shows), and the guys like NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre who are pulling in hefty salaries running high-octane incendiary and fanciful Alamo campaigns to incite virulent fear – and you got the beginnings of understanding why gun control never gets much past "go." In fact, except with the brief early Bill Clinton passage of the Assault Weapons Ban (flawed as it was and which sunset after 10 years), the nation has been moving incrementally backwards on gun policy.

Memories of gun massacres last a few months and fade away, but the psychological need of the white man for feeling sexually and politically powerful continues like a raging tsunami as progressives forget about the last mass shooting, the issue receding as a priority among the majority of the nation who support gun control.

On March 29 in the Washington Post, Charlotte Childress and Harriet Childress discussed the culpability of white male gun worshippers in regards to mass shootings (and that is only the most visible edge of the some 10,000 gun homicides each year in the US, in addition to countless gun injuries): :eusa_whistle:

Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and Profit

I have to say, OP, I pretty much agree with you completely, and being on this forum for a couple of months has confirmed this perspective for me in no uncertain terms. Most/many of those who are so vehemently and adamantly clinging to their guns, who are so loudly and virulently in opposition to any type of gun control, those are the ones on here who are clearly teetering between sanity and insanity. They are frightening people who demonstrate a true lack of vision and understanding of life and the world around them. And, they are all, aparently white men: most of them certainly are bare bones racists. Scary.

Sweeping generalizations make you look like an idiot most of the time, and in this case it appears the general trend holds.

Its not the guns, its the concept that our rights can be swept away, even with consitutional protection, by those who desire more control over us, and more power for the government.

Go after the 1st or the 4th amendment and I would go after you just as hard.
 
I think you're painting this generalization with a far too large brush, t_.

And the Fruedian interpretation is of course, just over the top.

Sometimes, mate, an AR-15 is just an AR-15.

Well worth saying again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top