Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,460
- 15,583
ExplosivesBy the way ... how did the lower part of the building get "pulverized"? ...
Thermite doesn't explode. It buns. It doesn't 'pulverize' concrete.
You're switching back and forth between conspiracies whenever one or the other runs into conspiracy crippling problems. Which is what someone does when their theory doesn't work.
As for 'explosives', the WTC towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. There was no explosive or apparatus of explosive ever found, not a single inch of blasting wire, not a single timer, not a single detonator. Not before, not during, not after 911. Despite 10s of thousands of such charges required and dozens of miles of such wires necessary for explosive demolition.
Nor was there a single girder cut in a manner consistent with explosive demolition.
Nor were there seismic signatures consistent with explosive demolition detected by any of the seismic sensors nearby.
Nor was there any residue of explosives found in the dust of the WTC plaza, despite an analysis of that dust so precise it could detect prescripton medication from the WTC pharmecy.
Worse still, the collapse of both towers initiated at the site of the impact with the planes where massive fires raged from the 10s of thousands of pounds of jet fuel that were scattered around floors. Any explosives there would have detonated, any apparatus of explosive demolition been reduced to bubbling pools of plastic.
The explosive demolition theory is simply an awful explanation, inconsistent with the events of 911. How do you explain these massive inconsistencies between the explosive demolition theory......and the overwhelming evidence contradicting it?
You can't.
Last edited: