Maoism with American Characteristics

[Darkwind]

Intersectionality is a Woke standard, but what is it? Where does it come from? The history of the concept isn't that hard to trace, and where it leads us is back to some of the worst regimes in history. Kim Crenshaw tends to be credited with Intersectionality, but she got it from the radicals in the Combahee River Collective. They put the idea together, in their turn, from the advocacy and activism of Herbert Marcuse. Marcuse was copying Mao, who was completing ideas laid down by Stalin for completing the perfect Soviet Union.

 

[ReinyDays]

Do I have to waste an hour watching a video just to find out what the hell you're talking about? ...

If you're not woke, then you're asleep ... that's what the Bible says ...

 

[Darkwind]

Do I have to waste an hour watching a video just to find out what the hell you're talking about? ...

If you're not woke, then you're asleep ... that's what the Bible says ...

If you care, you put in the time. No one can give you a summary of the dangers you face and impart with that summary the depth of the knowledge necessary to combat the problem.

An effort is required. In this case, it's simply the effort of listening to an essay, digesting the information, and coming to your own conclusion on the validity of the information and what you can do about it.

There is no shortcut.

 

[Moonglow]

I am still waiting for the intellectuals to be executed before I make a decision.

 

[ReinyDays]

Oh ... I have the information ... and many long years to experience and digest it ... the Rich and Powerful will never allow socialism ... and the Bolsheviks and Maoists can't afford eminent domain ...

When it comes to Rich vs. Poor ... the Rich win every time ...

 

[Moonglow]

Those rich bastards who control and manipulate the markets and the economy, they control the governments and they want to control yous, is that Moaism? I am afraid not.

 

[Darkwind]

Oh ... I have the information ... and many long years to experience and digest it ... the Rich and Powerful will never allow socialism ... and the Bolsheviks and Maoists can't afford eminent domain ...

When it comes to Rich vs. Poor ... the Rich win every time ...

It has little to do with the rich vs the poor. That is an old and classic Marxist dialectic setup. It harkens back to the proletariat vs. the bourgeoisie, though they now operate under the umbrella of Critical Theory.

The Maoist tactics are evident just about everywhere, and as the essay says, it's just been given American Characteristics and nomenclature.

Just like Mao, the people who won't allow anything to be done about it -- you'll note that in Post-Mao Chana, the only rich are the party members -- are the Commissars in our society right now.

This is one of the problems of the 'red-washing' of our school curriculum.

 

[Mac-7]

Do I have to waste an hour watching a video just to find out what the hell you're talking about? ...

If you're not woke, then you're asleep ... that's what the Bible says ...

Since you choose the Bible on which to base your argument are you a Christian who accepts God as your creator?

I suspect you are a godless lib

 

[Darkwind]

Those rich bastards who control and manipulate the markets and the economy, they control the governments and they want to control yous, is that Moaism? I am afraid not.

Straight out of Marx.

 

[Moonglow]

Straight out of Marx.

Yeah right, now explain what it was called before Moa existed or Marx, derpa.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Oh ... I have the information ... and many long years to experience and digest it ... the Rich and Powerful will never allow socialism ... and the Bolsheviks and Maoists can't afford eminent domain ...

When it comes to Rich vs. Poor ... the Rich win every time ...

Camelot Cum

"Rich" is a meaningless term unless you distinguish between those who made their wealth on their own and those who inherited it. The HeirHead Kennedys started all this Neo-Communism, so you're no more immune to birth-charisma than a Bushlover is.