Marjorie Greene RAGES on Twitter after Judge Says Lawsuit Disbarring her from Running for Re-Election can PROCEED

[scruffy]

A crucial principal of democracy is that no one is above the law. That's a lesson all the 1/6 organizers, enablers and elected cheerleaders need to learn.

And maybe a few leftist DA's

 

[Vrenn]

Yeah, no.

I'm sure Hitler would be tickled pink that you're so willing to start Krystallnacht in America.

So you nazis are telling everyone else that they are nazis. Standard Rumpsterism.

 

[TemplarKormac]

So you nazis are telling everyone else that they are nazis. Standard Rumpsterism.

You have nothing good left to say, little SS wannabe.

 

[toobfreak]

Marjorie Greene RAGES on Twitter​

Who could blame her? Another SHAM being driven by the Left.

 

[toobfreak]

So you nazis are telling everyone else that they are nazis. Standard Rumpsterism.

ODD:

1. Who is taking away the First Amendment like a Nazi? DEMOCRATS.
2. Who is attacking the 2nd Amendment? DEMOCRATS.
3. Who stole an election like a banana republic? DEMOCRATS.
4. Who is arresting enemies of the Democrat Party and holding them indefinitely with no bail and no charges? DEMOCRATS.
5. Who is trying to subvert our children? DEMOCRATS.
6. And who attacks everyone who doesn't think and live like they want? DEMOCRATS.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Her open support for and private involvement in the failed insurrection.

Again, that's an accusation. I don't feel comfortable keeping a person from running for office because of an accusation...

 

[Vrenn]

Again, that's an accusation. I don't feel comfortable keeping a person from running for office because of an accusation...

First comes the accusation. Then comes the charges. Next comes the judge. If it all comes out that she's guilty of helping with the jun6th then she gets convicted and even without a jail sentence, that's enough.

Or she might break the cycle.

 

[MisterBeale]

How many of our local USMB Republicans agree with her argument in the clip?

 

[MisterBeale]

Jan. 6th means shit. It is an excuse for stealing the election. This fucking ridiculous hyperbole is for the super gullible.

Agreed. But? It will all potentially turn on the political POV of administrative law judges, the Sec. of State, and, of course, MTG is correct, by allowing the very broadcast of these proceedings, and allowing the press into them? It makes are a very vulnerable candidate, so, either way, she is probably toast. Which? I think is the point. This is one of the lowest of low, political tactics by the Deep State yet. . .

Judge allows suit challenging Marjorie Taylor Greene's reelection bid​

Judge allows suit challenging Marjorie Taylor Greene's reelection bid

". . . Following the hearing, the administrative law judge will then report his findings to the secretary of state, who determines whether the candidate is qualified to seek and hold public office. The decision can be appealed to the Superior Court of Fulton County and the Georgia Court of Appeals or Supreme Court.

In their candidacy challenge filed with Raffensberger, the voters argued the events of January 6 "amounted to an insurrection or a rebellion under Section Three [of the 14th Amendment]: a violent, coordinated effort to storm the Capitol to prevent the vice president of the United States and the United States Congress from fulfilling their constitutional roles by certifying President Biden's victory, and to illegally extend then-President Trump's tenure in office, including by illegally introducing illegitimate electors as 'alternate slates' for Congress to vote on."

Evidence, they said, shows Greene "encouraged and was otherwise involved in efforts to intimidate Congress and the vice president" into rejecting state electoral votes and subverting the transfer of power.

The voters cited Greene's comments declaring a demonstration before the assault to be "our 1776 moment" and claim she was involved in either the planning of the January 6 attack or the planning of the rally at the Ellipse outside the White House, after which a mob of former President Donald Trump's supporters violently breached the Capitol.

"Each and all of these actions disqualify her from federal office under the Disqualification Clause of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment," they argued. . . "

 

[Sunsettommy]

Damn another Republican is exposed as a law breaker.

What law did she break?

 

[OKTexas]

Georgia judge allows suit challenging Marjorie Taylor Greene's reelection bid to proceed
By Melissa Quinn Updated on: April 19, 2022 / 11:48 AM / CBS News Washington
A federal judge on Monday paved the way for an effort to disqualify GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia from running for reelection over her role in the January 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol to proceed.





Marjorie went on Twitter and went BALLISTIC about having a court case proceed against her. THE SOCIALISTS WILL RIG IT AGAINST HER she says. Thoughts?

It won't proceed for long, it will end with the first federal appeal. That said you need to go back to school to learn English.

.

 

[OKTexas]

You don't understand how ethics works I see. Damn if those little things don't get in the way, things like oaths of office and oaths to protect the US from enemies both foreign and domestic...

The 14th has nothing to do with ethics, it requires criminal acts. Greene hasn't been indicted for, tried or convicted of any criminal acts. No podunk GA judge has the authority to civilly rule otherwise. Greene should challenge GAs jurisdiction in federal court.

.

 

[OKTexas]

This whackadoodle is not a conservative and the republican party would be better off without her.

That's up to the voters in her district.

.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Such a low IQ sentence.

Such a low IQ comeback.

 

[OKTexas]

It's in the OP.

The OP doesn't claim she's been convicted of anything.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Then maybe she should limit her exposure by not participating in insurrection.

Only commie politicos are using that term, no one in law enforcement is.

.

 

[MisterBeale]

Only commie politicos are using that term, no one in law enforcement is.

.

And . . . THAT? Is the whole point of this. It won't matter in the end, that the judge and the Sec. of State will find no grounds for disqualifying her from running, they will have already given her primary opponents and general election opponents enough material to not only sink her candidacy, but also make sure no one would want to even have her elected to the school board. .

It is a not about the law, it is a political spin and hit job by the establishment and the Deep State, because she does not support their agenda.

Nancy Pelosi explains the wrap-up smear tactic to the press​

It is what they have planned for her, and what they constantly did to Trump, over and over, and none of it was ever true. It was self-generated fake garbage, but folks thought, since it was on TEE VEE, it had to be true.

 

[OKTexas]

The suit is to look into whether she was part of the insurrection attempt. Until the insurrection is taken care of look for this type of thing. They have just started locking people up.

And not one has been charged with insurrection.

.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Curious, what did she do, hold open the door to the capitol building for the rioters? No wait, that happened to be capitol police.

 

[OKTexas]

And . . . THAT? Is the whole point of this. It won't matter in the end, that the judge and the Sec. of State will find no grounds for disqualifying her from running, they will have already given her primary opponents and general election opponents enough material to not only sink her candidacy, but also make sure no one would want to even have her elected to the school board. .

It is a not about the law, it is a political spin and hit job by the establishment and the Deep State, because she does not support their agenda.

Nancy Pelosi explains the wrap-up smear tactic to the press​

It is what they have planned for her, and what they constantly did to Trump, over and over, and none of it was ever true. It was self-generated fake garbage, but folks thought, since it was on TEE VEE, it had to be true.

And it could easily backfire, most voters don't take kindly to out of State interference in elections. Especially when they saw plenty of it in 2020.

.