ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,507
- 54,271
- 3,615
When you beat the Dims at their own game, they move the goalposts. Its what they do.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Markey threatens to pack Supreme Court, abolish filibuster if Trump fills seat
- Thread starter shockedcanadian
- Start date
Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,094
- 1,410
- Banned
- #42
You have already packed the courts...you know, all those vacancies you blocked Obama from filling that you have now stuffed?Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.www.vox.com
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
Stop lying.
Point out the lie asshole.
I have two articles there that support my OP.
skye
Diamond Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 62,476
- 61,894
- 3,635
When you beat the Dims at their own game, they move the goalposts. Its what they do.
But it won't work anymore.
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 46,051
- 35,657
- 3,615
President Trump has a constitutional obligation to fill the seat left vacant by RBG.
For the libs to threaten violence , or to try for an end around to pack the court with libs is just sour grapes.
IMHO, after President Trump wins reelection, he needs to increase the size of the SCOTUS to 15 and appoint 6 new moderate justices.
For the libs to threaten violence , or to try for an end around to pack the court with libs is just sour grapes.
IMHO, after President Trump wins reelection, he needs to increase the size of the SCOTUS to 15 and appoint 6 new moderate justices.
How could they pack the court when the Republicans have the senate, POTUS and it appears the majority of votes in the country. Keep talking about packing the courts and we'll have a Republican landslideSome democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 79,486
- 55,450
- 2,645
The Republicans need to be pushed toward a definitive solution and eliminate the democrat communists for a few more generations.
WelfareQueen
Diamond Member
Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
Look don't stop the Dims from saying this crap. It means Trump wins in an even bigger landslide.
If Trump wins again, JUdge Thomas has talked about retiring.The Republicans need to be pushed toward a definitive solution and eliminate the democrat communists for a few more generations.
Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
No it would not be the end of the nation. It would establish balance.
Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,094
- 1,410
- Banned
- #51
Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
No it would not be the end of the nation. It would establish balance.
The only balance will be my shotgun on my shoulder and someone like you in my sights.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,149
- 56,924
- 3,615
Where does the Constitution say anything about "balance" on the SC, Dummy?Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
No it would not be the end of the nation. It would establish balance.
Seems to me this is a green light for Republicans to pack the court if Trump wins and the Senate stays in Republican hands.
Why not 47 SC Justices nominated by Trump, confirmed by McConnell.
It is very unlikely that Republicans will ever have the White House again. They cannot be the party of white men and expect to win.
Where does the Constitution say anything about "balance" on the SC, Dummy?Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
No it would not be the end of the nation. It would establish balance.
The Constitution does not stop the Congress from expanding the courts. Dummy.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,149
- 56,924
- 3,615
Your nominee is the whitest white man to ever live. He is even whiter than Fauxcohontas Warren.Seems to me this is a green light for Republicans to pack the court if Trump wins and the Senate stays in Republican hands.
Why not 47 SC Justices nominated by Trump, confirmed by McConnell.
It is very unlikely that Republicans will ever have the White House again. They cannot be the party of white men and expect to win.
Hell,, his leg hair is white.
When you beat the Dims at their own game, they move the goalposts. Its what they do.
The Republicans are moving the goalposts.
SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 96,147
- 73,651
- 3,605
Yeah..... just keep adding judges....he'll why not a hundred of them?
Beyond stupid
Beyond stupid
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,149
- 56,924
- 3,615
I said nothing about that, Asswipe.Where does the Constitution say anything about "balance" on the SC, Dummy?Some democrats are now touting packing the court.
Hope the realize it would be the end of the nation.
There is nothing, but nothing, that stops Trump from legally appointing RBG's replacement.
The democrats have been sore losers from the start.
The one thing Democrats can do to stop Trump from replacing Justice Ginsburg
Court-packing may be the only solution.
I might have considered supporting holding off, after thinking about it a while.
But when this shit starts.....you can forget it.
No it would not be the end of the nation. It would establish balance.
The Constitution does not stop the Congress from expanding the courts. Dummy.
Show us where the Constitution says anything about "balance" on the SC, Fuckwit
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,149
- 56,924
- 3,615
Nope. This has been done in the past.When you beat the Dims at their own game, they move the goalposts. Its what they do.
The Republicans are moving the goalposts.
Get educated, Moron.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 237
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 60
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 396
- Replies
- 254
- Views
- 7K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 51
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 255
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8521
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 484
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-