Meet the Real Hillary Clinton

[jknowgood]

Jeremiah you are a conniving lying gossiping weasel and Satan's minion in sheep's clothing by wearing the name Jeremiah.

You could care less about the truth and your ilk will be brought down to below the ground and in to the Lake by the Lord. AMEN!!!

This case never went to trial, no one in a court of law or the public knew or heard a single accusation about this 12 year old and her attraction to older men until YOUR ROTTEN ILK brought this out in the open to try to disparage Clinton, and you and your ilk are still doing this to disparage Clinton while not giving a rat's ass about the woman who was raped as a child....

Please spare us your phoneyness....we're on to you!

Your support of what Clinton did is noted.

 

[Dot Com]

I know the truth and so do you. You haven't got a leg to stand on, Ted. Keep the avatar photo. It's a perfect image of you!

Where's the transcript of her breaking legal ethics...

Clinton mounted a vigorous defense that included discrediting the child victim’s story by writing in an affidavit that the girl was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men" and had made "false accusations" in the past. The victim told Thrush in 2008 and the Daily Beast that Clinton made that up. But investigators in the case also found inconsistencies in the victim’s story, according to Thrush’s reporting.

Where did she said she lied there...

According to the victim, who must be heard and believed, Clinton lied. How does such damning evidence get submitted to a court without collaborating evidence?

They have been given the truth right here on this thread. They don't want the truth because it proves their candidate is unfit for the office of president.

a thrice- divorced misogynist who has declared bankruptcy is better eh Jerri?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I know the truth and so do you. You haven't got a leg to stand on, Ted. Keep the avatar photo. It's a perfect image of you!

Where's the transcript of her breaking legal ethics...

Clinton mounted a vigorous defense that included discrediting the child victim’s story by writing in an affidavit that the girl was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men" and had made "false accusations" in the past. The victim told Thrush in 2008 and the Daily Beast that Clinton made that up. But investigators in the case also found inconsistencies in the victim’s story, according to Thrush’s reporting.

Where did she said she lied there...

According to the victim, who must be heard and believed, Clinton lied. How does such damning evidence get submitted to a court without collaborating evidence?

They have been given the truth right here on this thread. They don't want the truth because it proves their candidate is unfit for the office of president.

a thrice- divorced misogynist who has declared bankruptcy is better eh Jerri?

Would you prefer a sociopath that has long been suspected of being a serial murderer along with her rapist husband (by many Americans)? If so, you had better get your head examined.

46 Deaths Related to the Clintons NOT COUNTING 15 MORE Benghazi-Related Victims Murdered or the Original Four: Does it Matter Now Hillary?

1. James McDougal – Convicted Whitewater partner of the Clintons who died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2. Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown (Washington, D.C.). The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment by Clinton in the White House.

3. Vince Foster – Former White House Councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law Firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide. (He was about to testify against Hillary related to the records she refused to turn over to congress.) Was reported to have been having an affair with Hillary.

4. Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the Air Traffic controller committed suicide.

5. C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

6. Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock on September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.

7. Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day His wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

8. Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

9. James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited Prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas

10. James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to the Clintons’ Whitewater deals.

11. Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones Lawsuit, and Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

12. Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancée of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancée, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancée.

13. Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassiter, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client, Dan Lassiter, was a convicted drug distributor.

14. Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot Wounds.

15. Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General.. Died Of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a Suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

16. Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

17. Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter who was Investigating the Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

18. Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death. (May have died of poison)

19. Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15,1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

20. Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

21. Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

22. Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and Brother.

23. Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.

24. Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

25. Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

26. Hershel Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.

27. Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the two boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. The initial report of death said their deaths were due to falling asleep on railroad tracks and being run over. Later autopsy reports stated that the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

28. Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.

29. Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov 1988

30. Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

31. Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989. (Coroner ruled death due to suicide)

32. James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”?

33. Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

34. Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

PERSONAL BODYGUARDS ALL DIED OF MYSTERIOUS CAUSES OR SUICIDE

35. Major William S. Barkley, Jr.

36. Captain Scott J . Reynolds

37. Sgt. Brian Hanley

38. Sgt. Tim Sabel

39. Major General William Robertson

40. Col. William Densberger

41. Col. Robert Kelly

42. Spec. Gary Rhodes

43. Steve Willis

44. Robert Williams

45. Conway LeBleu

46. Todd McKeehan

And this list does not include the four dead Americans in Benghazi that Hillary abandoned! The BLOOD is on her hands!!

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT? GET REAL!

 

[Dot Com]

I know the truth and so do you. You haven't got a leg to stand on, Ted. Keep the avatar photo. It's a perfect image of you!

Where's the transcript of her breaking legal ethics...

Clinton mounted a vigorous defense that included discrediting the child victim’s story by writing in an affidavit that the girl was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men" and had made "false accusations" in the past. The victim told Thrush in 2008 and the Daily Beast that Clinton made that up. But investigators in the case also found inconsistencies in the victim’s story, according to Thrush’s reporting.

Where did she said she lied there...

According to the victim, who must be heard and believed, Clinton lied. How does such damning evidence get submitted to a court without collaborating evidence?

They have been given the truth right here on this thread. They don't want the truth because it proves their candidate is unfit for the office of president.

a thrice- divorced misogynist who has declared bankruptcy is better eh Jerri?

Would you prefer a sociopath that has long been suspected of being a serial murderer along with her rapist husband (by many Americans)? If so, you had better get your head examined.

46 Deaths Related to the Clintons NOT COUNTING 15 MORE Benghazi-Related Victims Murdered or the Original Four: Does it Matter Now Hillary?

thelastgreatstand.com? and you state "many Americans"? You mean many butt hurt fringers.

Where do you find these rw red meat sites?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Where's the transcript of her breaking legal ethics...

Clinton mounted a vigorous defense that included discrediting the child victim’s story by writing in an affidavit that the girl was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men" and had made "false accusations" in the past. The victim told Thrush in 2008 and the Daily Beast that Clinton made that up. But investigators in the case also found inconsistencies in the victim’s story, according to Thrush’s reporting.

Where did she said she lied there...

According to the victim, who must be heard and believed, Clinton lied. How does such damning evidence get submitted to a court without collaborating evidence?

They have been given the truth right here on this thread. They don't want the truth because it proves their candidate is unfit for the office of president.

a thrice- divorced misogynist who has declared bankruptcy is better eh Jerri?

Would you prefer a sociopath that has long been suspected of being a serial murderer along with her rapist husband (by many Americans)? If so, you had better get your head examined.

46 Deaths Related to the Clintons NOT COUNTING 15 MORE Benghazi-Related Victims Murdered or the Original Four: Does it Matter Now Hillary?

thelastgreatstand.com?

Where do you find these rw red meat sites?

Would you like more sources?
Here you go:
Another Clinton Associate Found DEAD, Bill & Hillary's Body Count Increases! - The Political Insider

Fascinating information is going viral about Hillary and Bill Clinton, which exposes just how truly ruthless they are. In many ways they are worse than Obama. One major reason I say this is because the Clintons have a long history of people in their inner-circle dying under mysterious circumstances.

In fact, 46 people who were close to the Clintons have died during their 3 decades of political power. That number should give us all pause. If Hillary Clinton was a Republican, that number would be the question asked by reporters every day.

Now, the latest to be added to the list, maintained by WhatReallyHappened.com, is Walter Scheib. He was hired by the Clinton White House to work as a Chef, and continued to serve the Bush administration. Interestingly, he was reported missing during a hike, and his body was found almost 2 miles away at the bottom of a river. No cause of death has ever been made, but the death date is listed as June 13, 2015.


Dead men can't talk.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Where's the transcript of her breaking legal ethics...

Clinton mounted a vigorous defense that included discrediting the child victim’s story by writing in an affidavit that the girl was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men" and had made "false accusations" in the past. The victim told Thrush in 2008 and the Daily Beast that Clinton made that up. But investigators in the case also found inconsistencies in the victim’s story, according to Thrush’s reporting.

Where did she said she lied there...

According to the victim, who must be heard and believed, Clinton lied. How does such damning evidence get submitted to a court without collaborating evidence?

They have been given the truth right here on this thread. They don't want the truth because it proves their candidate is unfit for the office of president.

a thrice- divorced misogynist who has declared bankruptcy is better eh Jerri?

Would you prefer a sociopath that has long been suspected of being a serial murderer along with her rapist husband (by many Americans)? If so, you had better get your head examined.

46 Deaths Related to the Clintons NOT COUNTING 15 MORE Benghazi-Related Victims Murdered or the Original Four: Does it Matter Now Hillary?

thelastgreatstand.com? and you state "many Americans"? You mean many butt hurt fringers.

Where do you find these rw red meat sites?

Look up their obituaries. If you think this was a coincidence, Hillary might have some swamp land you'd be interested in too.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The silence is deafening around here now..........
Just wow.

 

[Dot Com]

where are the indictments hack grl?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

where are the indictments hack grl?

Thanks for bumping up my thread, Dot. Would you mind tweeting this link to Twitter so a wider audience can read it? Thank you.

 

[Vandalshandle]

I have not only read your link but I'm familiar with the adversarial position argument. For a defense attorney not to offer his client the best defense he can provide is unethical. It is not the job of defense attorneys to decide on the guilt or innocence of their client. If he or she believes a client is guilty and offers less than a best effort defense, then the attorney is not only robbing the client of a fair trial but is taking the decision of guilt or innocent away from the jury. The only way our judicial works is if both the prosecution and the defense do their best to prosecute or defend the accused, leaving the decision of guilt or innocents to the jury.

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As a defense attorney, I may "know" that my client is guilty, but it is the prosecutor who must prove it, and I will throw out every legal roadblock available to me to keep him from doing so. In the meantime, I will still sleep at night, because I am really defending the law. If the prosecutor is a better attorney than I am, he will probably prevail. If not, he will not prevail, and that is his problem, not mine.

Every attorney would “throw out every legal roadblock available” to defend his client; however, knowingly and willfully lying in court is not legal. I suggest you read the link I provide. There are many more links on the subject and I suggest you go to Google. Would you lie in court to get your client acquitted? I would not.

By the way, you are not “defending the law” when you lie in court. You are instead violating the law by your dishonest and unethical conduct.

I have not read the links, nor even have I read about this particular case, so I am talking law as it pertains to American Justice in general. I had a case once, where my attorney asked me specifically if i had money due to me from my clients that my wife did not know about. I told him, "No". He knew that was not true, but it left him with a clear path to deny any such allegation from her attorney. If he had been of a lesser ethical persuasion, I could have told him the truth, and he could have argued that anything I had said was protected by attorney/client privilege. OR, he could have argued that I had told him that money was due to me from my client, but that he did not believe me, for any number of reasons.

One way, or another, it boils down to the same thing. the prosecuting attorney has the burden of proving guilt. The defense attorney would be disbarred for intentionally failing to defend his client to the utmost of his ability. The bar association wants him to follow their ethical guidelines. The law doesn't concern itself with such niceties. You can take that to the bank..

That is where your problem is. You admit you never looked at the links nor did you read the case. Yet you comment on this story as if you did. Go back and review independent sources on this case rather than the whitewash job Hillary's camp is hoping you'll accept.

Not necessary. I have been to law school. I know that she would have been disbarred if she had not defended her client to the best of her ability. Those that don't agree with our legal system can start by amending the Constitution.

 

[couch protester]

If this is all you got, then you got nothing. Her job was to defend him as best she could and there is nothing here to say she went overboard. Another made up stories from the right... Why don't you have actual evidence to back your assumptions...

The demoRATS love their criminals, illegals, rapist, molesters, Trump harassers, woman harassers, Bill Clinton harassers, KKK democrat party name, BLM.

 

[Flopper]

Defense attorneys are ethically and legally bound to zealously represent all clients, the guilty as well as the innocent. It matters not how terrible the crime nor the belief of the attorney in the guilt or innocent of the accused. As Sir Thomas Moore said before going to the scaffold, "I'd give the devil the benefit of law, for mine own safety's sake." A vigorous defense is necessary to protect the innocent and to ensure that judges and citizens and not the police have the ultimate power to decide who is guilty of a crime.

Wrong. Read up. Ethics is obviously not your forte', Flopper.

http://www.lsuc.on.ca/media/sith_colloquium_asimow_michael.pdf

So are you saying she should have refused to defend the person?

Had you read the entire article you'd know the answer to that question.

I have not only read your link but I'm familiar with the adversarial position argument. For a defense attorney not to offer his client the best defense he can provide is unethical. It is not the job of defense attorneys to decide on the guilt or innocence of their client. If he or she believes a client is guilty and offers less than a best effort defense, then the attorney is not only robbing the client of a fair trial but is taking the decision of guilt or innocent away from the jury. The only way our judicial works is if both the prosecution and the defense do their best to prosecute or defend the accused, leaving the decision of guilt or innocents to the jury.

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As your link says, no attorney really knows if their client is guilty. They may think they are guilty but that does not relieve them of the burden of advocating the innocence of their client. If defense attorneys refused to argue the innocence of their clients because they believed them guilty, there would be no point in a trial. If you are a student of the law, then you know quite well, that for our judicial system to work, the defense attorney must give their client their best possible defense even though they may believe the client to be guilty.

 

[FA_Q2]

So are you saying she should have refused to defend the person?

Had you read the entire article you'd know the answer to that question.

I have not only read your link but I'm familiar with the adversarial position argument. For a defense attorney not to offer his client the best defense he can provide is unethical. It is not the job of defense attorneys to decide on the guilt or innocence of their client. If he or she believes a client is guilty and offers less than a best effort defense, then the attorney is not only robbing the client of a fair trial but is taking the decision of guilt or innocent away from the jury. The only way our judicial works is if both the prosecution and the defense do their best to prosecute or defend the accused, leaving the decision of guilt or innocents to the jury.

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As a defense attorney, I may "know" that my client is guilty, but it is the prosecutor who must prove it, and I will throw out every legal roadblock available to me to keep him from doing so. In the meantime, I will still sleep at night, because I am really defending the law. If the prosecutor is a better attorney than I am, he will probably prevail. If not, he will not prevail, and that is his problem, not mine.

Every attorney would “throw out every legal roadblock available” to defend his client; however, knowingly and willfully lying in court is not legal. I suggest you read the link I provide. There are many more links on the subject and I suggest you go to Google. Would you lie in court to get your client acquitted? I would not.

By the way, you are not “defending the law” when you lie in court. You are instead violating the law by your dishonest and unethical conduct.

And how does that pertain to this case?

You are making an argument that has nothing to do with the thread as far as I can tell.

 

[Freewill]

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As a defense attorney, I may "know" that my client is guilty, but it is the prosecutor who must prove it, and I will throw out every legal roadblock available to me to keep him from doing so. In the meantime, I will still sleep at night, because I am really defending the law. If the prosecutor is a better attorney than I am, he will probably prevail. If not, he will not prevail, and that is his problem, not mine.

Every attorney would “throw out every legal roadblock available” to defend his client; however, knowingly and willfully lying in court is not legal. I suggest you read the link I provide. There are many more links on the subject and I suggest you go to Google. Would you lie in court to get your client acquitted? I would not.

By the way, you are not “defending the law” when you lie in court. You are instead violating the law by your dishonest and unethical conduct.

I have not read the links, nor even have I read about this particular case, so I am talking law as it pertains to American Justice in general. I had a case once, where my attorney asked me specifically if i had money due to me from my clients that my wife did not know about. I told him, "No". He knew that was not true, but it left him with a clear path to deny any such allegation from her attorney. If he had been of a lesser ethical persuasion, I could have told him the truth, and he could have argued that anything I had said was protected by attorney/client privilege. OR, he could have argued that I had told him that money was due to me from my client, but that he did not believe me, for any number of reasons.

One way, or another, it boils down to the same thing. the prosecuting attorney has the burden of proving guilt. The defense attorney would be disbarred for intentionally failing to defend his client to the utmost of his ability. The bar association wants him to follow their ethical guidelines. The law doesn't concern itself with such niceties. You can take that to the bank..

That is where your problem is. You admit you never looked at the links nor did you read the case. Yet you comment on this story as if you did. Go back and review independent sources on this case rather than the whitewash job Hillary's camp is hoping you'll accept.

Not necessary. I have been to law school. I know that she would have been disbarred if she had not defended her client to the best of her ability. Those that don't agree with our legal system can start by amending the Constitution.

Truly, there is nothing that people won't defend Mrs. Tuzla Clinton. Even smearing and lying about a 12-year-old girl and blaming her rape on the victim. Man that is some depraved thinking.

 

[Freewill]

Wrong. Read up. Ethics is obviously not your forte', Flopper.

http://www.lsuc.on.ca/media/sith_colloquium_asimow_michael.pdf

So are you saying she should have refused to defend the person?

Had you read the entire article you'd know the answer to that question.

I have not only read your link but I'm familiar with the adversarial position argument. For a defense attorney not to offer his client the best defense he can provide is unethical. It is not the job of defense attorneys to decide on the guilt or innocence of their client. If he or she believes a client is guilty and offers less than a best effort defense, then the attorney is not only robbing the client of a fair trial but is taking the decision of guilt or innocent away from the jury. The only way our judicial works is if both the prosecution and the defense do their best to prosecute or defend the accused, leaving the decision of guilt or innocents to the jury.

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As your link says, no attorney really knows if their client is guilty. They may think they are guilty but that does not relieve them of the burden of advocating the innocence of their client. If defense attorneys refused to argue the innocence of their clients because they believed them guilty, there would be no point in a trial. If you are a student of the law, then you know quite well, that for our judicial system to work, the defense attorney must give their client their best possible defense even though they may believe the client to be guilty.

A lawyer is not allowed to lie, period. Mrs. Tuzla lied about a 12-year-old girl well below the age of consent.

 

[S.J.]

Let's see how this case turns out in the court of public opinion. A clip of the interview of Hillary laughing about knowing her client was guilty and her unsubstantiated claim about the 12 year old victim "seeking out older men" in order to win a case for a child rapist. They can include the doctor's report about the child's injuries being consistent with rape. We'll see how the public feels about those legal technicalities the liberals in this thread are using to defend Hillary.
I look forward to the tv ad.

 

[Freewill]

47 percent could not care less.

 

[Ridgerunner]

 

[Vandalshandle]

So are you saying she should have refused to defend the person?

Had you read the entire article you'd know the answer to that question.

I have not only read your link but I'm familiar with the adversarial position argument. For a defense attorney not to offer his client the best defense he can provide is unethical. It is not the job of defense attorneys to decide on the guilt or innocence of their client. If he or she believes a client is guilty and offers less than a best effort defense, then the attorney is not only robbing the client of a fair trial but is taking the decision of guilt or innocent away from the jury. The only way our judicial works is if both the prosecution and the defense do their best to prosecute or defend the accused, leaving the decision of guilt or innocents to the jury.

Everything you assume is wrong. I have a Juris Doctorate from one of the best law schools in the State of Florida and what I told you is what I was taught, which is: The duty to aggressively defend a client does not include lying in court. Lying in court is a violation of the Code of Ethical Conduct for attorneys and judges and can result in punishment. Most attorneys get away with lying because no one finds out about it. Hillary was just plain stupid for admitting she knew her client was guilty.

PS: Here is a link for you. I gave you the first one I found because I don't have that much sand at the top of the hourglass and am not going to waste my time convincing you of what I know to be true.

Lawyer Thinks Client is Guilty: Does It Matter? Criminal Law Process | Nolo.com

As your link says, no attorney really knows if their client is guilty. They may think they are guilty but that does not relieve them of the burden of advocating the innocence of their client. If defense attorneys refused to argue the innocence of their clients because they believed them guilty, there would be no point in a trial. If you are a student of the law, then you know quite well, that for our judicial system to work, the defense attorney must give their client their best possible defense even though they may believe the client to be guilty.

A lawyer is not allowed to lie, period. Mrs. Tuzla lied about a 12-year-old girl well below the age of consent.

Well, then, since lawyers are not allowed to lie, I guess that means that you folks have been slandering Obama for years.....

 

[Valerie]

After law school, Hillary didn’t join a big law firm in Washington or New York. Instead, she went to work for the Children’s Defense Fund, going door-to-door in New Bedford, Massachusetts, gathering stories about the lack of schooling for children with disabilities. These testimonials contributed to the passage of historic legislation that required the state to provide quality education for students with disabilities.

This commitment to public service and fighting for others—especially children and families—has stayed with her throughout her life.


After serving as a lawyer for the congressional committee investigating President Nixon, she moved to Arkansas where she taught law and ran legal clinics representing disenfranchised people. She co-founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, one of the state’s first child advocacy groups.



As first lady, Hillary tenaciously led the fight to reform our health care system so that all families would have access to the care they need at affordable prices. When the insurance companies and other special interests defeated that effort, Hillary didn’t give up. She worked with Republicans and Democrats to help create the successful Children's Health Insurance Program, which provides health coverage to more than 8 million children and has helped cut the uninsured rate for children in half.

Hillary's story