It's an unreasonable search when the target of that search didn't comply with a subpoena? Please do elaborate.4th Amendment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an unreasonable search when the target of that search didn't comply with a subpoena? Please do elaborate.4th Amendment.
You think so? I was under the impression that in the case of impeachment it is the Senate that convicts. feel free to disagree of course.Yet they tried twice to impeach Trump. Puts to lie your statement.
The Congress can ask the stated AG whether he preferred leaving his office by resigning or undergoing removal by way of impeachment.Could you try this again in English please. Not sure what you mean.
WW
Trump offered them anything they wished to look at. Instead of accepting his open door, they waited awhile and then stuck him with a subpoena when he was out of town. It was a filthy, rotten, no-good, horrible sleight-of-middle finger of the hand thing of the Demonrats to do. And while he was out of town they entered his home armed to the hilt and went through his wife's clothing drawers, and his son's bedroom. How low can you go? Must I go find the text to the fourth Amendment, or are you going to continue to follow these conniving Democrats who have the FBI by threat to their paychecks? I'm done with this discussion. Ta-ta.It's an unreasonable search when the target of that search didn't comply with a subpoena? Please do elaborate.
The subpoena was issued on May 11th. The search warrant application was done on August 5th. Trump was out of town for 3 months?Trump offered them anything they wished to look at. Instead of accepting his open door, they waited awhile and then stuck him with a subpoena when he was out of town. It was a filthy, rotten, no-good, horrible sleight-of-middle finger of the hand thing of the Demonrats to do. And while he was out of town they entered his home armed to the hilt and went through his wife's clothing drawers, and his son's bedroom. How low can you go? Must I go find the text to the fourth Amendment, or are you going to continue to follow these conniving Democrats who have the FBI by threat to their paychecks? I'm done with this discussion. Ta-ta.
The AG would be wiser to resign. He is a smart enough jurist to realize the AG has to be blind to partisanship and play fair. Biden is using him like the deep state is using Biden.The repubs created trump. Now that the walls are closing in...they want to blame someone else.
Unless they have actual evidence of an actual crime, the Senate will likely not convict.
Can you highlight to what perceived partisanship you’re referring to?The AG would be wiser to resign. He is a smart enough jurist to realize the AG has to be blind to partisanship and play fair. Biden is using him like the deep state is using Biden.
Funny you finally figured this out after twice impeaching a president simply because he won.
You know you libshits remind me of that fucked up neighbor that walks by a pissed off dog in a backyard and taunts it every single day, and then gets mad when it runs up to the fence and wants to bite you.
You keep taunting Trump, he's not going away. He's going to fight HARDER. And so will his followers. You want him to go away? Leave him the fuck alone. But YOU keep bringing him front and center, and then bitch that he's front and center.
That was certainly not the stated reasons for impeachment.Funny you finally figured this out after twice impeaching a president simply because he won.
That was certainly not the stated reasons for impeachment.
Hey dumbass, the 11,000 vote story has nothing to do with Garland, that's the lawsuit filed by the Georgia AG.It was a partisan move. Garland should be forced to resign. He’s a Democrat political operative.
It’s a good think he was kept off the Supreme Court.
Oh there's a lot of crime!Gotta find a crime first.
Give them time; they're only in their 7th year of investigations against him.
Which is irrelevant to Garland politically weaponizing the DOJ, you effing idiot hack.Hey dumbass, the 11,000 vote story has nothing to do with Garland, that's the lawsuit filed by the Georgia AG.
Except they haven’t discovered any.Oh there's a lot of crime!
Then why do you react so strongly to "empty words"?There’s no substance to refute. It’s simply empty words.
There’s no politics in being asked to be the AG, dope.
And they continue to show a lack of integrity by trying the same lies over and over. Kind of like the definition of insanity.Well we know they have no integrity, they failed to convict Trump when he was impeached - twice.
WW
You didn't say shit when Trump acted like the DOJ was his own personal hit squad!Which is irrelevant to Garland politically weaponizing the DOJ, you effing idiot hack.
Bullshit! They've discovered a lot! Get your fucking head out of the sand!Except they haven’t discovered any.
You claimed that a member of the executive branch cannot be impeached. The president is the chief executive of the government and they tried twice. Stop making such a huge food of yourself and admit that you know nothing on this subject.You think so? I was under the impression that in the case of impeachment it is the Senate that convicts. feel free to disagree of course.
Well then throw yerself a Tizzy Fit Party.