protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,113
- 18,356
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #181
Those are the commonly heard estimates. What's your problem ? Too much CNN ? PBS ?Estimated 12 to 40 millions ? And you want me to take your stats seriously ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those are the commonly heard estimates. What's your problem ? Too much CNN ? PBS ?Estimated 12 to 40 millions ? And you want me to take your stats seriously ?
The economy has not benefitted ANYTHING from them. If they weren't in the jobs they're in, Americans would be in those jobs, and the Americans would be spending their wages in American stores (AKA "the economy"), not sending hundreds of Billions$$ of it out of the country, to be re-inserted into other countries' economies.$138 billion is drop in a bucket of how many trillions fo dollars did the economy benefited from them and thousands of businesses live off their hard work from a rancher in Texas to a restaurant in Wyoming.
We spent trillions on wars in the middle east and we didn't squat back.
Now, what the hell are you talking about ? WHAT farmers ? And how do thy get into this ?The Farmers will pay involuntarily.
Later they will be whining for more (as always) Gobmint handouts.
TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT Had Kept Us Free for a Hundred YearsPosse Comitatus Act prevents the President or Federal government from using the Military as law enforcement within our borders...for the most part.
The military can help local law enforcement with duties of theirs, but they can not do the actual jobs of border protection. They can't use their arms either.....
.
"Refuges" Are Criminal Fugitives or Cowards Who Won't Fight for Their Own FreedomIf a foreign Country is trying to invade us, then there is a process of congress declaring war against them......Posse Comitatus Act prevents the President or Federal government from using the Military as law enforcement within our borders...for the most part.
The military can help local law enforcement with duties of theirs, but they can not do the actual jobs of border protection. They can't use their arms either.....
And if asylum seekers reach our border, the law requires we take them in, and follow the legal process to determine if they are legal asylum seekers, meeting the criteria for asylum, and that process takes about a year.
So you're saying any country is free to invade the US and the military can't respond?
The caravan is NOT in any way, a foreign government or Country... these people are trying to escape from their government/their country if they are asylum seekers.
so I have no idea of what you are talking about....?
Should Have Gotten an Oscar for Kings RowTrump has done a pretty good job of securing the border already, via his mouth, without a single penny needing to be spent on that wall.... he's put fear in to all of them..... illegal border crossings are down 81% from like 20 years ago....They have been sent to assist border patrol on several occasions and this will be no different.... they were not allowed to use their guns, they were not allowed to officially arrest anyone....they were allowed to assist the border patrol but not be militarized....Nonsense! US presidents have employed the National Guard inside the US a number of times. GW Bush did in 2006. Obama did in 2011. In 1957, when Arkansas Governer Orville Faubus called out the National Guard to enforce segregation, then President Eisenhower federalized those troops and put them under HIS command (to integrate the schools). On top of that Ike also sent in US federal troops.Posse Comitatus Act prevents the President or Federal government from using the Military as law enforcement within our borders...for the most part.
The military can help local law enforcement with duties of theirs, but they can not do the actual jobs of border protection. They can't use their arms either.....
And if asylum seekers reach our border, the law requires we take them in, and follow the legal process to determine if they are legal asylum seekers, meeting the criteria for asylum, and that process takes about a year.
As for the asylum issue, it is about to undergo a rapid and deep overhaul. Days of foreigners treating our border like it was their toy, are over.
Trump made it sound like they were going there with arms in hand and were going to use them if someone crossed the border, and that simply is not the case.....
that's all I am saying....
You and everyone else can go and pretend all you want....that this is some BIGLEY macho Trumpian effort to fight the enemy....I can't stop you....
Trump will secure the border, the left will be triggered, in that order.
What NG troops do at the Mexican border remains to be seen. There is no such thing as >> "this will be no different.... they were not allowed to use their guns, they were not allowed to officially arrest anyone....they were allowed to assist the border patrol but not be militarized...."They have been sent to assist border patrol on several occasions and this will be no different.... they were not allowed to use their guns, they were not allowed to officially arrest anyone....they were allowed to assist the border patrol but not be militarized....
Trump made it sound like they were going there with arms in hand and were going to use them if someone crossed the border, and that simply is not the case.....
that's all I am saying....
You and everyone else can go and pretend all you want....that this is some BIGLEY macho Trumpian effort to fight the enemy....I can't stop you....
Get ready for a big HUH ??? Mexico is warning the US that if American National Guard troops placed on the border result in a militarization of it, that relations may be impaired.
Whoa! "Relations" ? So, in other words, Mexico is saying that if we take steps to defend ourselves from the 70 year invasion of our border they have been perpetrating....the international burglary of our economy they have been committing....the theft of millions of our jobs they have done...the theft of Billions of our tax dollars$$...then their feelings will be hurt.
This is like if your next door neighbor was entering your house every week for decades, and stealing things from you, and now you say he shouldn't come in any more, he'll be miffed.
I have one question. Why has Mexico not been taken over by the US, and made into a US territory, under all our laws and regualtions ? And why wasn't this done many years ago ?
After the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), then US President James K. Polk was outraged that we acquired 1/2 of Mexico's territory. Polk thought we should have gotten ALL of Mexico, and made it part of the US, entirely under US rule. No US president ever said anything more correct.
Insurrection Act.You're flat out wrong and I sourced it. They CAN be used on the border, they CAN use their weapons, and they CAN be used for Law Enforcement purposes. Thank you Patriot Act and NDAA.
Insurrection Act - Wikipedia
Your link says that the military can only be used AFTER local authorities and police have failed to keep control of the population.
What population centers are currently in full blown revolt or insurrection?
"Section 1076 is titled "Use of the Armed Forces in major public emergencies." It provided that:
The President may employ the armed forces... to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack" or incident, or other condition... the President determines that... domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order... or [to] suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such... a condition... so hinders the execution of the laws... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.[7]
So, where is it so bad in this country that the local authorities have lost all control?
Insurrection Act.You're flat out wrong and I sourced it. They CAN be used on the border, they CAN use their weapons, and they CAN be used for Law Enforcement purposes. Thank you Patriot Act and NDAA.
Insurrection Act - Wikipedia
Your link says that the military can only be used AFTER local authorities and police have failed to keep control of the population.
What population centers are currently in full blown revolt or insurrection?
"Section 1076 is titled "Use of the Armed Forces in major public emergencies." It provided that:
The President may employ the armed forces... to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack" or incident, or other condition... the President determines that... domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order... or [to] suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such... a condition... so hinders the execution of the laws... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.[7]
Mexico has a habit of talking ridiculous. We know that.So that means Mexico won't take our money anymore? They'll stop shipping drugs over the border? This could wind up pretty scary for us.
I'm trying to care about their threat, I really am. But I'm not getting anywhere with that
Mexican border for 2.Chicago for one
Apocalypto Spreading Like The Blobnbc sent down reporters to follow the caravan people... a few hundred in a Convent some stopped at, are being taken in....just a low number of them there, said they would still continue onward, the rest are not....I don't know what Mexico's laws are....?/——/ Well why doesn’t Mexico accept them? Have they no compassion for refugees? Mexico should give them asylum, a drivers license and welfare. What’s stopping them?If a foreign Country is trying to invade us, then there is a process of congress declaring war against them......So you're saying any country is free to invade the US and the military can't respond?
The caravan is NOT in any way, a foreign government or Country... these people are trying to escape from their government/their country if they are asylum seekers.
so I have no idea of what you are talking about....?
As far as the caravan coming, they did take in about 400 of them, from what I saw on the news last night....but there are some that still plan to move forward to us....
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? They are deporting them, yes I sourced this too.
In reply to >> "So, where is it so bad in this country that the local authorities have lost all control?"Mexican border for 2.
Make Them Beg, "No Mas!"So, it IS an invasion...I don't know what Mexico's laws are....?/——/ Well why doesn’t Mexico accept them? Have they no compassion for refugees? Mexico should give them asylum, a drivers license and welfare. What’s stopping them?If a foreign Country is trying to invade us, then there is a process of congress declaring war against them......Posse Comitatus Act prevents the President or Federal government from using the Military as law enforcement within our borders...for the most part.
The military can help local law enforcement with duties of theirs, but they can not do the actual jobs of border protection. They can't use their arms either.....
And if asylum seekers reach our border, the law requires we take them in, and follow the legal process to determine if they are legal asylum seekers, meeting the criteria for asylum, and that process takes about a year.
So you're saying any country is free to invade the US and the military can't respond?
The caravan is NOT in any way, a foreign government or Country... these people are trying to escape from their government/their country if they are asylum seekers.
so I have no idea of what you are talking about....?
As far as the caravan coming, they did take in about 400 of them, from what I saw on the news last night....but there are some that still plan to move forward to us....
And Mexico is COMPLICIT in facilitating it.
And is that why GM and FORD and other companies are moving back to the US from Mexico ? Keep banging your head against the wall, if you wish.It absolutely is higher production costs. That’s why that Carrier plant that Trump “saved” is still moving jobs to Mexico despite the massive bribe Trump and Pence paid them in tax breaks.
There was a guy on the news last night that was being interviewed who said that he'd voted for Trump. Now? He's kinda sorry that he did because the steel tariffs have increased the cost of his trailers that he builds by 25 percent, and he's not sure he can stay competitive with others or even stay in business.
Wanna talk about the soybean farmers? If China boycotts American soybeans, they don't have to worry, because they also trade with Brazil which has had a bumper crop of soybeans recently.
Your link says that the military can only be used AFTER local authorities and police have failed to keep control of the population.
What population centers are currently in full blown revolt or insurrection?
"Section 1076 is titled "Use of the Armed Forces in major public emergencies." It provided that:
The President may employ the armed forces... to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack" or incident, or other condition... the President determines that... domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order... or [to] suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such... a condition... so hinders the execution of the laws... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.[7]
So, where is it so bad in this country that the local authorities have lost all control?
"" or incident, or other condition... the President determines that"
Kind of frightening that the President, ANY President can make the "determination" eh?
"so hinders the execution of the laws... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws"
Its an easy jump to this "condition" with "illegal" immigration. I'm not claiming that to enact this would be right, but he/they clearly have the authority to do it. Sorry.
It also says that Congress has to be informed as to what is going on and the progress every 14 days. And, Congress can stop him if they so choose.
Wanna talk about the price of aluminum ? It's down 4%.There was a guy on the news last night that was being interviewed who said that he'd voted for Trump. Now? He's kinda sorry that he did because the steel tariffs have increased the cost of his trailers that he builds by 25 percent, and he's not sure he can stay competitive with others or even stay in business.
Wanna talk about the soybean farmers? If China boycotts American soybeans, they don't have to worry, because they also trade with Brazil which has had a bumper crop of soybeans recently.
Even Their Classmates on the Right Use That Illegitimate TermGet ready for a big HUH ??? Mexico is warning the US that if American National Guard troops placed on the border result in a militarization of it, that relations may be impaired.
Whoa! "Relations" ? So, in other words, Mexico is saying that if we take steps to defend ourselves from the 70 year invasion of our border they have been perpetrating....the international burglary of our economy they have been committing....the theft of millions of our jobs they have done...the theft of Billions of our tax dollars$$...then their feelings will be hurt.
This is like if your next door neighbor was entering your house every week for decades, and stealing things from you, and now you say he shouldn't come in any more, he'll be miffed.
I have one question. Why has Mexico not been taken over by the US, and made into a US territory, under all our laws and regualtions ? And why wasn't this done many years ago ?
After the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), then US President James K. Polk was outraged that we acquired 1/2 of Mexico's territory. Polk thought we should have gotten ALL of Mexico, and made it part of the US, entirely under US rule. No US president ever said anything more correct.
The left says it's racist to secure borders. They are so full of shit.
Of course, libs used to say secure borders were needed.
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant", is like calling a bank robber, an "informal withdrawl agent"Even Their Classmates on the Right Use That Illegitimate Term
Notice the traitors' progression from "illegal aliens" to "illegal immigrants." Calling these lawless creatures "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters "shoppers."