Michael Avenatti furious over ‘CREEPY P___ LAWYER’ chyron on Fox News

[danielpalos]

Whining about being called "creepy porn lawyer" is only going to make people use it even more...

Perhaps he should stop being a creepy porn lawyer if he doesn’t like being called one….

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

What does that mean?

if You don't know; who is the pot calling the kettle, creepy?

 

[danielpalos]

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

I do not watch FOX or MSNBC; both are cartoons. CNN/NPR/Associated Press are my go-to’s. So I do not know how trustworthy anyone on Fox are. And I do not care.

Stormy’s lawyer (he’s not worthy of learning how to spell his name) is a scumbag. Had she had an affair with John Doe and not the President, creepy lawyer doofus wouldn’t be anywhere near her at this point if he even would have taken the case. She had her story to tell which, by the way, was told in about 5 minutes; she slept with a married man. Wow. Great. Your 15 minutes are up.

That Trump keeps the story going with his feckless denials and the details of the payoff is great in tarnishing Trump’s re-election hopes with independents although I think treating women like garbage actually helps him with his base. But that does not excuse the actions of Stormy and Stormy’s schiester who has apparently been trolling for a “crossfire” type show with The Mooch on any network that has recently been treated for rodents and gives him a dependable payday complete with set lights. The adult entertainment industry is rife with criminal activity. We’ll see where he is when she gets on the wrong side of the law next time and it involves her less glamorous partners/customers/johns. My guess is that he won’t be anywhere to be found.

Both he and Trump are portraits of scumbaggery; Daniels is where she belongs between these two.

No blame for the Fox news person?

Blame for what? The lawyer is who he was outside of whatever the kerfuffle is with Fox.

I thought the agreement was supposed to be, to report the news, not make the news.

I thought prosecutors investigated crime?

did Fox news, hire their own investigative reporter; or are they simply, making news.

 

[jc456]

He's paid to be a creepy porn lawyer for fake news and the democrat party, they highly respect him, he should just accept his role, quit whining and cash the checks.

why should the left wing, take the right wing, seriously?

Who asked you to? we know who you and your party really are!

so does the left know not to take the right wing seriously, about anything.

I could give a shit!. At least republicans accept defeat! Let me know when you do!

 

[BluesLegend]

Obviously when you said Hillary wasn't investigated enough, which is ridiculous.

Ken Star nearly charged Hillary with perjury after a 3 hour deposition under oath in which Hillary claimed she could not remember like 499 times. Ken said Bill skillfully dodged the questions, Hillary just lied and claimed she couldn't remember.

Links to that garbage?

Ken Star's new book, tissue?

link, super duper?

Starr's a super partisan scumbag. Almost means b*******.

I win the debate again, lets be honest that's not surprising.

 

[jc456]

I do not watch FOX or MSNBC; both are cartoons. CNN/NPR/Associated Press are my go-to’s. So I do not know how trustworthy anyone on Fox are. And I do not care.

Stormy’s lawyer (he’s not worthy of learning how to spell his name) is a scumbag. Had she had an affair with John Doe and not the President, creepy lawyer doofus wouldn’t be anywhere near her at this point if he even would have taken the case. She had her story to tell which, by the way, was told in about 5 minutes; she slept with a married man. Wow. Great. Your 15 minutes are up.

That Trump keeps the story going with his feckless denials and the details of the payoff is great in tarnishing Trump’s re-election hopes with independents although I think treating women like garbage actually helps him with his base. But that does not excuse the actions of Stormy and Stormy’s schiester who has apparently been trolling for a “crossfire” type show with The Mooch on any network that has recently been treated for rodents and gives him a dependable payday complete with set lights. The adult entertainment industry is rife with criminal activity. We’ll see where he is when she gets on the wrong side of the law next time and it involves her less glamorous partners/customers/johns. My guess is that he won’t be anywhere to be found.

Both he and Trump are portraits of scumbaggery; Daniels is where she belongs between these two.

No blame for the Fox news person?

Blame for what? The lawyer is who he was outside of whatever the kerfuffle is with Fox.

I thought the agreement was supposed to be, to report the news, not make the news.

I thought prosecutors investigated crime?

did Fox news, hire their own investigative reporter; or are they simply, making news.

Explain?

 

[danielpalos]

He's paid to be a creepy porn lawyer for fake news and the democrat party, they highly respect him, he should just accept his role, quit whining and cash the checks.

why should the left wing, take the right wing, seriously?

Who asked you to? we know who you and your party really are!

so does the left know not to take the right wing seriously, about anything.

I could give a shit!. At least republicans accept defeat! Let me know when you do!

tax cut economics are worthless if they don't cover spending.

 

[jc456]

Whining about being called "creepy porn lawyer" is only going to make people use it even more...

Perhaps he should stop being a creepy porn lawyer if he doesn’t like being called one….

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

What does that mean?

if You don't know; who is the pot calling the kettle, creepy?

 

[danielpalos]

No blame for the Fox news person?

Blame for what? The lawyer is who he was outside of whatever the kerfuffle is with Fox.

I thought the agreement was supposed to be, to report the news, not make the news.

I thought prosecutors investigated crime?

did Fox news, hire their own investigative reporter; or are they simply, making news.

Explain?

just their Opinion piece.

 

[candycorn]

Perhaps he should stop being a creepy porn lawyer if he doesn’t like being called one….

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

I do not watch FOX or MSNBC; both are cartoons. CNN/NPR/Associated Press are my go-to’s. So I do not know how trustworthy anyone on Fox are. And I do not care.

Stormy’s lawyer (he’s not worthy of learning how to spell his name) is a scumbag. Had she had an affair with John Doe and not the President, creepy lawyer doofus wouldn’t be anywhere near her at this point if he even would have taken the case. She had her story to tell which, by the way, was told in about 5 minutes; she slept with a married man. Wow. Great. Your 15 minutes are up.

That Trump keeps the story going with his feckless denials and the details of the payoff is great in tarnishing Trump’s re-election hopes with independents although I think treating women like garbage actually helps him with his base. But that does not excuse the actions of Stormy and Stormy’s schiester who has apparently been trolling for a “crossfire” type show with The Mooch on any network that has recently been treated for rodents and gives him a dependable payday complete with set lights. The adult entertainment industry is rife with criminal activity. We’ll see where he is when she gets on the wrong side of the law next time and it involves her less glamorous partners/customers/johns. My guess is that he won’t be anywhere to be found.

Both he and Trump are portraits of scumbaggery; Daniels is where she belongs between these two.

No blame for the Fox news person?

Blame for what? The lawyer is who he was outside of whatever the kerfuffle is with Fox.

I thought the agreement was supposed to be, to report the news, not make the news.

Again, I do not watch FOX so I don’t know what happened. I remember being told that their shows featuring the talking heads (O’reilley, Hannity/Colmes etc…) have “opinion editors”; not journalists. Much like MSNBC I suppose. Making the news is the reason they are on. Dr. Laura or whatever the blond dumbfuck’s name is can’t possibly believe half the shit she says but it gets headlines.

 

[jc456]

Whining about being called "creepy porn lawyer" is only going to make people use it even more...

Perhaps he should stop being a creepy porn lawyer if he doesn’t like being called one….

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

I do not watch FOX or MSNBC; both are cartoons. CNN/NPR/Associated Press are my go-to’s. So I do not know how trustworthy anyone on Fox are. And I do not care.

Stormy’s lawyer (he’s not worthy of learning how to spell his name) is a scumbag. Had she had an affair with John Doe and not the President, creepy lawyer doofus wouldn’t be anywhere near her at this point if he even would have taken the case. She had her story to tell which, by the way, was told in about 5 minutes; she slept with a married man. Wow. Great. Your 15 minutes are up.

That Trump keeps the story going with his feckless denials and the details of the payoff is great in tarnishing Trump’s re-election hopes with independents although I think treating women like garbage actually helps him with his base. But that does not excuse the actions of Stormy and Stormy’s schiester who has apparently been trolling for a “crossfire” type show with The Mooch on any network that has recently been treated for rodents and gives him a dependable payday complete with set lights. The adult entertainment industry is rife with criminal activity. We’ll see where he is when she gets on the wrong side of the law next time and it involves her less glamorous partners/customers/johns. My guess is that he won’t be anywhere to be found.

Both he and Trump are portraits of scumbaggery; Daniels is where she belongs between these two.

If you don’t watch, how would you know?

 

[BluesLegend]

Funny... you can't defend Hillary so you DEFLECT. Hillary, is that you?

How am I defending Hillary? Jesus you can't even tell when someone is agreeing with you.

"It's what crooks do to avoid perjury charges." That means both Hillary and Sessions are crooks.

You suck at agreeing with me, work on it.

Remember this for next week when you and every other Trump supporter builds a strawman fallacy that I support Hillary. I don't. I think she is a crook, but she has been investigated over and over and they haven't charged her. It's time to move on. It doesn't change my opinion of her however.

Mob bosses escape prosecution for decades yet we don't give up on sending them to prison.

Hillary has no power any longer and is not a threat to society or the government any longer... it's a waste of time, money, and resources. Spend all that on people that can actually affect things.

Criminals should get off scott free if they are no longer a threat?

 

[jc456]

Ok, this was dirty and sneaky. I don't agree with it, but when I first saw this clip I had to laugh my behind off. "I agreed I wasn't going to call him the derogatory name I have called him" and then underneath the image of this guy time and time again is the caption.

It's not cool to do this, but the lawyer is a sleazy guy there is no question, and I had to laugh. He has a right to be upset and he had a right to call out Tucker to his face. Well...call me a bad guy for laughing, but I did. Maybe you will too

Michael Avenatti furious over ‘CREEPY PORN LAWYER’ chyron on Fox News

In an intense TV interview Thursday night, Fox News host and commentator Tucker Carlson promised Stormy Daniels’s attorney Michael Avenatti that he would not use his inflammatory nickname for the lawyer on his show — then immediately went to a chyron that read: “CREEPY PORN LAWYER TOYING WITH 2020 RUN.”

Carlson introduced Avenatti on “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” explaining that in the past, Avenatti has “demanded that we stop referring to him by a certain, unflattering nickname.”

“We haven’t agreed to that demand, but tonight, as a gesture of goodwill, we will not use that nickname,” Carlson vowed. “Because we’re always grateful when guests are brave enough to show up in person, including in this case.”

He then turned to the lawyer.

“We could sit here and hurl insults at each other for the segment. Already done that,” Carlson told Avenatti. “I’ve certainly insulted you. You’ve insulted me. But you seem smart, so let me take you seriously as somebody who wants to be involved in the public conversation.

At the time, the caption on the screen: “STORMY DANIELS’ LAWYER IS HERE TONIGHT.”

But once Carlson began questioning Avenatti about his presidential aspirations, it changed to include the nickname.

First, it read: “CREEPY PORN LAWYER TOYING WITH 2020 RUN.”

Then: “DOES AMERICA WANT CREEPY PORN LAWYER AS PRES?”

Then: “STORMY’S LAWYER AS CREEPY PORN PRESIDENT?”

Then: “TUCKER TAKES ON CREEPY PORN LAWYER.”

Then just: “CPL FINALLY AGREES TO INTERVIEW WITH TUCKER.”

and people bitch at cnn. rightfully so but this is every bit as bad.

Sometimes the guest is just a slime.

 

[Lewdog]

Obviously when you said Hillary wasn't investigated enough, which is ridiculous.

Ken Star nearly charged Hillary with perjury after a 3 hour deposition under oath in which Hillary claimed she could not remember like 499 times. Ken said Bill skillfully dodged the questions, Hillary just lied and claimed she couldn't remember.

Links to that garbage?

Ken Star's new book, tissue?

link, super duper?

Order the book or go watch a Ken Star book tour interview. Or continue picking at your navel it makes no difference to me.

Do you believe Ken Starr then? Cause he said he thinks a sitting President can be indicted.

 

[candycorn]

Whining about being called "creepy porn lawyer" is only going to make people use it even more...

Perhaps he should stop being a creepy porn lawyer if he doesn’t like being called one….

How trust worthy is that Fox news person?

I do not watch FOX or MSNBC; both are cartoons. CNN/NPR/Associated Press are my go-to’s. So I do not know how trustworthy anyone on Fox are. And I do not care.

Stormy’s lawyer (he’s not worthy of learning how to spell his name) is a scumbag. Had she had an affair with John Doe and not the President, creepy lawyer doofus wouldn’t be anywhere near her at this point if he even would have taken the case. She had her story to tell which, by the way, was told in about 5 minutes; she slept with a married man. Wow. Great. Your 15 minutes are up.

That Trump keeps the story going with his feckless denials and the details of the payoff is great in tarnishing Trump’s re-election hopes with independents although I think treating women like garbage actually helps him with his base. But that does not excuse the actions of Stormy and Stormy’s schiester who has apparently been trolling for a “crossfire” type show with The Mooch on any network that has recently been treated for rodents and gives him a dependable payday complete with set lights. The adult entertainment industry is rife with criminal activity. We’ll see where he is when she gets on the wrong side of the law next time and it involves her less glamorous partners/customers/johns. My guess is that he won’t be anywhere to be found.

Both he and Trump are portraits of scumbaggery; Daniels is where she belongs between these two.

If you don’t watch, how would you know?

how would I know what?

 

[BluesLegend]

Ken Star nearly charged Hillary with perjury after a 3 hour deposition under oath in which Hillary claimed she could not remember like 499 times. Ken said Bill skillfully dodged the questions, Hillary just lied and claimed she couldn't remember.

Links to that garbage?

Ken Star's new book, tissue?

link, super duper?

Order the book or go watch a Ken Star book tour interview. Or continue picking at your navel it makes no difference to me.

Do you believe Ken Starr then? Cause he said he thinks a sitting President can be indicted.

Ken Starr said he was convinced Hillary was lying, based on his experience deposing witnesses and her behavior during the deposition. Her refusal to answer so many questions by using the excuse that she could not remember. Ken Starr said he seriously considered charging Hillary with perjury for lying under oath. But that proving someone was lying using the "I can't remember" excuse is quite difficult to prove in court.

Do I believe Ken Starr? I sure do.

 

[Lewdog]

How am I defending Hillary? Jesus you can't even tell when someone is agreeing with you.

"It's what crooks do to avoid perjury charges." That means both Hillary and Sessions are crooks.

You suck at agreeing with me, work on it.

Remember this for next week when you and every other Trump supporter builds a strawman fallacy that I support Hillary. I don't. I think she is a crook, but she has been investigated over and over and they haven't charged her. It's time to move on. It doesn't change my opinion of her however.

Mob bosses escape prosecution for decades yet we don't give up on sending them to prison.

Hillary has no power any longer and is not a threat to society or the government any longer... it's a waste of time, money, and resources. Spend all that on people that can actually affect things.

Criminals should get off scott free if they are no longer a threat?

Criminals that have already been investigated several times over several years and not been indicted for it should...

Unless new evidence that would REALLY make a difference arises. Repeating the same charges with the same evidence over and over is just a waste of time and a political stunt.

 

[Lewdog]

Links to that garbage?

Ken Star's new book, tissue?

link, super duper?

Order the book or go watch a Ken Star book tour interview. Or continue picking at your navel it makes no difference to me.

Do you believe Ken Starr then? Cause he said he thinks a sitting President can be indicted.

Ken Starr said he was convinced Hillary was lying, based on his experience deposing witnesses and her behavior during the deposition. Her refusal to answer so many questions by using the excuse that she could not remember. Ken Starr said he seriously considered charging Hillary with perjury for lying under oath. But that proving someone was lying using the "I can't remember" excuse is quite difficult to prove in court.

Do I believe Ken Starr? I sure do.

Ken Starr isn't a qualified interviewer who has been professionally trained in detecting when people are lying. Do you understand the difference?

 

[BluesLegend]

You suck at agreeing with me, work on it.

Remember this for next week when you and every other Trump supporter builds a strawman fallacy that I support Hillary. I don't. I think she is a crook, but she has been investigated over and over and they haven't charged her. It's time to move on. It doesn't change my opinion of her however.

Mob bosses escape prosecution for decades yet we don't give up on sending them to prison.

Hillary has no power any longer and is not a threat to society or the government any longer... it's a waste of time, money, and resources. Spend all that on people that can actually affect things.

Criminals should get off scott free if they are no longer a threat?

Criminals that have already been investigated several times over several years and not been indicted for it should...

Unless new evidence that would REALLY make a difference arises. Repeating the same charges with the same evidence over and over is just a waste of time and a political stunt.

So Manafort should go free?

 

[Meister]

Wow....................so it's okay to use language like that on a prime time news cast?

And, if Avenatti exclusively represented porn lawyers, you could call him that, but apparently Ms. Daniels is his only adult film client.

One client doesn't make someone a "creepy porn lawyer".

It's more opinion journalism than straight news

 

[BluesLegend]

Ken Star's new book, tissue?

link, super duper?

Order the book or go watch a Ken Star book tour interview. Or continue picking at your navel it makes no difference to me.

Do you believe Ken Starr then? Cause he said he thinks a sitting President can be indicted.

Ken Starr said he was convinced Hillary was lying, based on his experience deposing witnesses and her behavior during the deposition. Her refusal to answer so many questions by using the excuse that she could not remember. Ken Starr said he seriously considered charging Hillary with perjury for lying under oath. But that proving someone was lying using the "I can't remember" excuse is quite difficult to prove in court.

Do I believe Ken Starr? I sure do.

Ken Starr isn't a qualified interviewer who has been professionally trained in detecting when people are lying. Do you understand the difference?

Do you understand Ken Starr wasn't the only interviewer in the room?