SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,280
- 280
- Banned
- #581
Other eyewitnesses said he was NOT surrendering. Obviously, the grand jury found them to be the more credible.
How can 3 witnesses be found more credible than 18? Impossible that it would not be enough to secure a trial, unless the agenda is protect the cop out of sympathy.
Witness testimony Michael Brown s last moments Reading Eagle - AP
Let's say just for fun that he did at some point have his hands up, big fucking deal. You don't get to pretend to surrender and then charge the cop .
And there is NO physical evidence, let me repeat, NO physical evidence, that he EVER had his hands up.
There are a few eyewitnesses that have testified that he did, BUT eyewitness testimony is next to worthless when it doesn't jive with you know ACTUAL evidence.
Take his person for example. (From your link)
"And that's when I proceeded to look out my rear view mirror, he was running, shots was fired, I saw Mike Brown turn around facing the officer at this time. Hands was up probably about like this, they weren't all the way up, but they was probably just like this. And that's when I looked at the review mirror, heard about two or three more gunshots, Michael Brown fell to the ground."
_ Witness stopped in her Monte Carlo along Canfield
- See more at: Witness testimony Michael Brown s last moments Reading Eagle - AP
How much do you REALLY think this woman saw or heard from her vehicle which was pointed AWAY from the scene?
Because she did not have time to turn around and get a good look at what was going on. LOL
She didn't testify that she turned around and looked moron, she SPECIFICALLY said " I looked in my rear view mirror"
I mean Jesus Christ you people are stupid.
You wouldn't even make it through an entry level police course , details matter in investigations. You ignore them all.