Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
You don't have Michelle Obama's birth certificate
I do not personally possess it.
I do recall conversing with a McCain campaign person in 2008 who said
"Michelle Obama does not exist"
meaning THERE IS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE with Michelle's name on it.
There is one with MICHAEL's...
LOL
Google has it
And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
You don't have Michelle Obama's birth certificate
I do not personally possess it.
I do recall conversing with a McCain campaign person in 2008 who said
"Michelle Obama does not exist"
meaning THERE IS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE with Michelle's name on it.
There is one with MICHAEL's...
LOL
Google has it
Aaand, the conspiracy troll posts a certificate of death. Nice!
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
Not at all. The rumors were around long before he got elected. And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
You call everything you don’t like a conspiracy theory, because either you can’t fathom that the government could ever be dishonest with us (which is absolutely pathetic and as ignorant as it gets) or because you’re dishonest yourself. Anyway, I know your type. There always seems to be one or two on just about every forum.
You don't have Michelle Obama's birth certificate
I do not personally possess it.
I do recall conversing with a McCain campaign person in 2008 who said
"Michelle Obama does not exist"
meaning THERE IS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE with Michelle's name on it.
There is one with MICHAEL's...
LOL
Google has it
Aaand, the conspiracy troll posts a certificate of death. Nice!
For someone born in 1854.
Apparently Michelle Obama is 164 years old in LA's delusional wasteland!
conspiracy headjobs making shit up
How is BARACK calling Michelle "Michael"
conspiracy headjobs making shit up
????????????????????????????
BARACK SAID IT
BARACK WROTE HIS BIO FOR HARVARD LAW
he didn't write his bio for Harvard law
he didn't write his bio for Harvard law
Gosh, an IVY LEAGUE "educated" person too DUMB to write up his own bio... did you write it for him???
So much for Affirmative Action....
IS Farrakhan "racist" too??
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
Not at all. The rumors were around long before he got elected. And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
Of course you're not going to get into it. As your 'evidence' is exactly what I told you it was: conspiracy headjobs making shit up. And then repeating themselves over and over.
This you call 'smoke'. As LA just demonstrated for us, its just imagination. Shit that LA made up, backed by nothing.
You call everything you don’t like a conspiracy theory, because either you can’t fathom that the government could ever be dishonest with us (which is absolutely pathetic and as ignorant as it gets) or because you’re dishonest yourself. Anyway, I know your type. There always seems to be one or two on just about every forum.
I call conspiracy theories conspiracy theories. This thread would be a lovely example of the kind of silly, insane nonsense I point and laugh at.
For example, I call Whittaker's appointment to the role of acting AG unconstitutional. Not a 'conspiracy'.
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
Not at all. The rumors were around long before he got elected. And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
Of course you're not going to get into it. As your 'evidence' is exactly what I told you it was: conspiracy headjobs making shit up. And then repeating themselves over and over.
This you call 'smoke'. As LA just demonstrated for us, its just imagination. Shit that LA made up, backed by nothing.
You call everything you don’t like a conspiracy theory, because either you can’t fathom that the government could ever be dishonest with us (which is absolutely pathetic and as ignorant as it gets) or because you’re dishonest yourself. Anyway, I know your type. There always seems to be one or two on just about every forum.
I call conspiracy theories conspiracy theories. This thread would be a lovely example of the kind of silly, insane nonsense I point and laugh at.
For example, I call Whittaker's appointment to the role of acting AG unconstitutional. Not a 'conspiracy'.
You have no idea what I was referring to, so don’t tell me what I have or don’t have. Continue licking boots and defending corrupt politicians… it’s what you do. I see you doing that on every just about every freakin thread. Again, I know your type.
In my opinion, Obama is most likely gay.
Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
As I said on the other thread, usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. And with him there’s a lot of smoke. Anyone who denies that either hasn’t done any research, or is a partisan lemming who defends him simply because of the letter by his name.
But that isn’t the problem with Obama. The problem is that he’s a phony, like most presidents these days. But that’s a topic for another thread.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
Not at all. The rumors were around long before he got elected. And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
Of course you're not going to get into it. As your 'evidence' is exactly what I told you it was: conspiracy headjobs making shit up. And then repeating themselves over and over.
This you call 'smoke'. As LA just demonstrated for us, its just imagination. Shit that LA made up, backed by nothing.
You call everything you don’t like a conspiracy theory, because either you can’t fathom that the government could ever be dishonest with us (which is absolutely pathetic and as ignorant as it gets) or because you’re dishonest yourself. Anyway, I know your type. There always seems to be one or two on just about every forum.
I call conspiracy theories conspiracy theories. This thread would be a lovely example of the kind of silly, insane nonsense I point and laugh at.
For example, I call Whittaker's appointment to the role of acting AG unconstitutional. Not a 'conspiracy'.
You have no idea what I was referring to, so don’t tell me what I have or don’t have. Continue licking boots and defending corrupt politicians… it’s what you do. I see you doing that on every just about every freakin thread. Again, I know your type.
More accurately, you have no idea what you're referring to. Which is why when pressed for evidence to back your claims, you give us excuses for why you can't.
The conspiracies are always iron clad and irrefutable....until you ask for the evidence. Then they fall apart.
And my type is one who demands evidence.
And clearly you deem anyone demanding evidence for your 'gay obama' conspiracy to be a waste of your time. Got it. We both knew that the moment you first posted.Nothing says 'gay' life a wife and two kids.
Nope. What you have is a lot of conspiracy headjobs making shit up, backed by nothing. And then laughably trying to use their accusations as evidence that their accusations must be true.
Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.
Not at all. The rumors were around long before he got elected. And there’s other evidence too, but I’m not even going to bother getting into it here.
Of course you're not going to get into it. As your 'evidence' is exactly what I told you it was: conspiracy headjobs making shit up. And then repeating themselves over and over.
This you call 'smoke'. As LA just demonstrated for us, its just imagination. Shit that LA made up, backed by nothing.
You call everything you don’t like a conspiracy theory, because either you can’t fathom that the government could ever be dishonest with us (which is absolutely pathetic and as ignorant as it gets) or because you’re dishonest yourself. Anyway, I know your type. There always seems to be one or two on just about every forum.
I call conspiracy theories conspiracy theories. This thread would be a lovely example of the kind of silly, insane nonsense I point and laugh at.
For example, I call Whittaker's appointment to the role of acting AG unconstitutional. Not a 'conspiracy'.
You have no idea what I was referring to, so don’t tell me what I have or don’t have. Continue licking boots and defending corrupt politicians… it’s what you do. I see you doing that on every just about every freakin thread. Again, I know your type.
More accurately, you have no idea what you're referring to. Which is why when pressed for evidence to back your claims, you give us excuses for why you can't.
The conspiracies are always iron clad and irrefutable....until you ask for the evidence. Then they fall apart.
And my type is one who demands evidence.
Stop patting yourself on the back. There are certain people who are a waste of time to deal with, and you’re one of them. I like dealing with sincere people who have a genuine interest in truth… Not bootlickers who do nothing but defend corrupt politicians, day in and day out. If you’re not getting paid for it, you should. You spend enough time doing it anyway.
if Louis Farakkan said it, it has to be true, huh?
