Mike Johnson has his "come to Orwell" moment.

[Seymour Flops]

Be honest, if that is the standard for passing immigration reform a bill will never be passed. The fact is, after Repubs squeezed many concessions out of Dems Trump killed the bill to deny Biden a bipartisan legislative victory on the border going in to the election.

Yes, there will have to be compromise or nothing will change. I’m sorry that Lankford was sent to negotiate the bill that he clearly was not ready to do.

5000 illegals legalized per day plus more is not any kind of compromise. It’s keep the border wide open, but also give us other things that we want. Can’t blame the Democrats for trying, but it failed so now they need to get serious.

Hundreds of 1000s of dollars for foreign dictators, and less than a fourth of that for our own border is not a compromise.

At least not an acceptable compromise to anyone who cares about the United States more than Ukraine. More than Israel for that matter.

The Senate bill was way too lopsided in favor of illegal aliens, and against American citizens. The go along to get along Republicans in the Senate might have signed off on it if they hadn’t been caught. But the house would’ve never signed off on it. It was a doomed bill from the start.

A compromise means something that could actually make it to the president’s desk. Tell your Democrat buddies to get serious and offer some real border reform that would force the new Secretary of Homeland security to be serious about protecting homeland security.

 

[Lesh]

Yes, there will nerf to be compromise or nothing will change. I’m sorry that Lankford was sent to negotiate the bill that he clearly was not ready to do.

5000 illegals legalized per day plus more is not any kind of compromise. It’s keep the border wide open, but also give us other things that we want. Can’t blame the Democrats for trying, but it failed so now they need to get serious.

Hundreds of 1000s of dollars for foreign dictators, and less than a fourth of that for our own border is not a compromise.

At least not an acceptable compromise to anyone who cares about the United States more than Ukraine. More than Israel for that matter.

The Senate bill was way too lopsided in favor of illegal aliens, and against American citizens. The go along to get along Republicans in the Senate might have signed off on it if they hadn’t been caught. But the house would’ve never signed off on it. It was a doomed bill from the start.

A compromise means something that could actually make it to the presidents desk. Tell your Democrat buddies to get serious and offer some real border reform that would force the new Secretary of Homeland security to be serious about protecting homeland security.

Your misunderstanding or dishonesty about the Senate bill is duly noted.

It does NOT “ legalize 5,000 “ per day. It allows that many to claim asylum. Almost all of whom will be dismissed out of hand per the new rules for asylum IN THE GOD DAMNED BILL

 

[Clipper]

HR2 passed a long time ago and your precious Dems won’t even bring it for a vote. YOU own the border mess. But keep lying to yourself. It’s all you have,

No mention of support for Ukraine thanks to Putin's asslicker, Trump? You must be waiting for the orange crazy person to spoonfeed you more shit, piss & vinegar.

 

[Clipper]

It’s not about being hard to please – it’s about being a blind partisan rightwing hack who has no interest in sound, responsible governance.

Short Stuff Little Mikey the hypocrit is more concerned with keeping his job then in doing what's right. He owes his speakership to that subhuman ape Trump & he's not man enough to cross him.

The GOP nut HOR is the most incompetent Congress in history, which is not surprising considering the MAL Ape is pulling their strings.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Your misunderstanding or dishonesty about the Senate bill is duly noted.

It does NOT “ legalize 5,000 “ per day. It allows that many to claim asylum. Almost all of whom will be dismissed out of hand per the new rules for asylum IN THE GOD DAMNED BILL

Sure they will. After how many years of “waiting for a court date” after being released into the country? Then what percentage of them will actually show up for that court date, knowing that they have no legitimate asylum claim?

How many Americans will be killed by the ones among them that are gang members, drunk drivers, fentanyl mules, and human traffickers?

No way to predict the actual number, I know. So why don’t you just tell us what the acceptable number for those deaths of Americans and trafficked children is for you?

 

[Oddball]

Your misunderstanding or dishonesty about the Senate bill is duly noted.

It does NOT “ legalize 5,000 “ per day. It allows that many to claim asylum. Almost all of whom will be dismissed out of hand per the new rules for asylum IN THE GOD DAMNED BILL

What it says is that they'll shut down the border at the 5,000 threshold....This presumes that the border can be shut down before those 5,000 mendicants crash it.

You should be the very last to chide anyone about misunderstanding and/or dishonesty.

 

[Lesh]

Sure they will. After how many years of “waiting for a court date “after being released into the country. Then what percentage of them will actually show up for that court date, knowing that they have no legitimate asylum claim?

How many Americans will be killed by the ones among them that are gang members, drunk drivers, fentanyl mules, and human traffickers?

No way to predict the actual number, I know. So why don’t you just tell us what the acceptable number for those desks is for you?

And that’s the other part of the SenTe Bill you are either lying about or ignorant of.

It greatly expands the numbers of courts and judges so that instead of years waiting for a hearing ( that most will now lose) it only takes weeks to months with most waiting in detention (yes it has money to expand detention as well)

It also reduces the number waiting for hearing because under the new rules in the bill far fewer will even get a court hearing

It actually appears to be a well thought out bill

If a little on the tough side

 

[Seymour Flops]

And that’s the other part of the SenTe Bill you are either lying about or ignorant of.

It greatly expands the numbers of courts and judges so that instead of years waiting for a hearing ( that most will now lose) it only takes weeks to months with most waiting in detention (yes it has money to expand detention as well)

It also reduces the number waiting for hearing because under the new rules in the bill far fewer will even get a court hearing

It actually appears to be a well thought out bill

If a little on the tough side

Yeah, right. The Democrats favor a bill that is “a little on the tough side“ for illegal immigration. Yes, that makes sense.

Have you even read the bill? The 5000 limit has so many loopholes that it would be almost impossible for the conditions to be met. Even if the conditions were met, it only gives the secretary of Homeland security the authority to turn people away at the border. It does not require him to. We know he doesn’t want to, so why would he?

Maybe you should ask yourself the question that Americans ask about Democrats. How is securing the border to protect Americans from murderous illegal aliens a “compromise?“

Compromise with who? People who want unlimited illegal immigration?

 

[Meister]

NOTHING is going to stop it cold

Nor would business allow that. They want that cheap labor pool

It may not stop it, but drip, drip, drip is better than 100,000's monthly.
Get real

 

[Meister]

BS.

BS what? Cat got your tongue?

 

[Meister]

Liar.

LIAR!

 

[IM2]

BS what? Cat got your tongue?

Your post was bs. That's all I need to say.

 

[Rawley]

Trump lies all the time, about everything, all the time. When will you learn?

The bipartisan border deal would not allow 5,000 illegal crossings per day, despite what Trump says

What's become a popular talking point among conservative Republicans opposed to an emerging immigration bill is incorrect. Here's what it would do.

www.nbcnews.com

What did they lie about. The Senate scam allowed up 5,000 illegal to remain in the US after getting caught.

 

[Meister]

Your post was bs. That's all I need to say.

No it wasn't, and the democrat author of that Bill even stated it didn't stop the invasion of illegals.

Sometimes it's better to be silent and though a foo......., IM2

 

[IM2]

What did they lie about. The Senate scam allowed up 5,000 illegal to remain in the US after getting caught.

The Border Patrol Union supported the Senate bill.

 

[Rawley]

One of Biden's first acts as prez was to introduce immigration reform legislation and ask for Repub's help in passing it. That was the genesis of the compromise legislation Trump blocked.

So Schumer's been working on this piece of shit for three years? Do you really want to crow about that?

 

[IM2]

No it wasn't, and the democrat author of that Bill even stated it didn't stop the invasion of illegals.

Sometimes it's better to be silent and though a foo......., IM2

Yes, you should be silent given the fact that the Border Patrol Union supported that bill. There is no invasion and it's time you idiots stopped using this inflammatory race baited rhetoric.

 

[Meister]

Yes, you should be silent given the fact that the Border Patrol Union supported that bill. There is no invasion and it's time you idiots stopped using this inflammatory race baited rhetoric.

Race baited rhetoric, huh? 100,000's illegals had entered this country ILLEGALLY, and you call it "race baited rhetoric?

There was a few republicans that supported that Bill too, but that doesn't mean it was a good Bill.
4,000 illegals could enter daily without any thing being done. That is not a fix for the border.
If they can cut it to 4,000 they could go the rest of the way in securing the border.
Of course, you would want open borders....there is a reason for that, but I don't know what it is.

 

[IM2]

Race baited rhetoric, huh? 100,000's illegals had entered this country ILLEGALLY, and you call it "race baited rhetoric?

There was a few republicans that supported that Bill too, but that doesn't mean it was a good Bill.
4,000 illegals could enter daily without any thing being done. That is not a fix for the border.
If they can cut it to 4,000 they could go the rest of the way in securing the border.
Of course, you would want open borders....there is a reason for that, but I don't know what it is.

Yes race baited rhetoric. There is no fucking invasion, and we have a visa waver program where people from 39 white countries can come here without visas. So why are you calling what's happening at the southern border an invasion?

The bill was good. If the border patrol union likes it and they are the ones affected by it, what you and others who read the epoch times for your information think is irrelevant. Trump told the congress not to pass the bill because he wants to use immigration to race pimp you MAGAS. That's all this is. A good bill wasted for trump.

 

[Meister]

Yes race baited rhetoric. There is no fucking invasion, and we have a visa waver program where people from 39 white countries can come here without visas. So why are you calling what's happening at the southern border an invasion?

The bill was good. If the border patrol union likes it and they are the ones affected by it, what you and others who read the epoch times for your information think is irrelevant. Trump told the congress not to pass the bill because he wants to use immigration to race pimp you MAGAS. That's all this is. A good bill wasted for trump.

You keep saying the Bill was good...no, no it wasn't no matter what you say, IM2. It didn't secure the border, dude.

If 100,000's of Russians came across our border monthly, and over a million a year, it would be considered an invasion.
Think about that awhile before you post your drivel.