lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 26,522
- 20,339
- 2,320
It's Democrat voters who are having smoke blown up their asses. You drink too much Dem kool-aid.You guys should have realized by now you’re having smoke blown up your asses.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's Democrat voters who are having smoke blown up their asses. You drink too much Dem kool-aid.You guys should have realized by now you’re having smoke blown up your asses.
That didn't happen.If it is a sham why did 7 legislatures pick alternative electors? Things like that are done based on fact. Those legislatures saw and heard enough evidence to reach the conclusion their states were defrauded. Period.
It did happen. The electors were symbolic but it means they thought there was fraud. You face realirty. Why is every state fighting audits if there was no fraud?That didn't happen.
Hello, Earth to Lastdeadender, this is reality calling!
Stop being part of an insane cult!
Lots of Trump voters thought there was fraud because that’s the bullshit they’ve been told to believe.The electors were symbolic but it means they thought there was fraud.
The bullshit is what you believe. 5 years of lies, they are not going to stop now.Lots of Trump voters thought there was fraud because that’s the bullshit they’ve been told to believe.
So far your most factual argument is that a bunch of supporters believed Trump won.The bullshit is what you believe. 5 years of lies, they are not going to stop now.
Trump was defrauded. Period. The guilt exhibited by state officials and Dominion make it obvious.So far your most factual argument is that a bunch of supporters believed Trump won.
Yes. They did.
Too bad Trump didn’t win.
What’s obvious is that you guys are constantly talking about fraud and never seem to find the actually evidence for it.Trump was defrauded. Period. The guilt exhibited by state officials and Dominion make it obvious.
Especially when these machines aren't on any real network. They are essentially kiosks with a USB printer to spit out the result on paper receipt.Are you fucking kidding me? His proof was intercepted encrypted packets collected by hackers? Anyone that knows networking should know he was fucking lying.![]()
In a word, no.Are people so stupid as to believe this contrived excuse for why the evidence they promised to provide is no where to be seen?
A lot of terms that likely sound magically intelligent and computery to your friends at the quarry, but the sheer amount of bovine excrement riddled into this technical sounding fairy tale could drown an elephant.The cyber symposium produced several newsworthy stories that should have resonated with the public. First, they received forensic images of the same Dominion machine from Mesa Co. Colorado before and after the election showing that Dominion employees destroyed election records to audit network connectivity and vote total modifications. This has energized the state officials at the conference to demand forensic audits in their own state. Second, they demonstrated how unsecure the Dominion election system is by easily hacking it in a mock election. They connected to its SQL Server database and modified election totals. They saw from the forensic images that this software was intentionally modified to undermine its security features. Event logs on the Dominion machines would confirm this pathway if they can be viewed before Dominion deletes them in their "update". Third, they showed that even people with CISSP credentials that were granted access to their PCAP data were willing to inject a "poison pill" into the data so that any public use of it would trigger security confiscation of the hardware. Whether this was classified IP addresses or passwords to services like the Emergency Broadcast Notification System the effect was it shutdown any PCAP sharing for detailed analysis. By not providing a debrief of the Red Team findings on the PCAP data we are left with more questions than answers. Josh Merritt said the data was "not recoverable" and they couldn't use it to prove anything. Phil Waldren disputes this and called Merrit's statement a lie. Did Merrit get threatened? How far were they able to get? Did it load into a packet sniffer? Was it encrypted or unencrypted? The low information public debate and hit news pieces are disinformation just meant to discredit Lindell. This is not over until every state does a forensic audit on their Dominion machines and the paper ballot adjudication scam. Until that day the rest is just noise. History will decide if Mike Lindell was a sucker or, more likely, simply "the meteor" of a much larger conflict ala John Brown and the Civil War.
How many votes did China change in the 2020 "stolen election"?so what, how many votes did they change? If that never happened, then you have bubkis.
Clinton harmed herself
I'm still wondering why left loons are so wound up over a pillow salesman
Hint:, everyone I know snickers at him
So nice that you can be so snarky.
Maybe you should study history and realpolitik (political realism.)
IMO? You watch too much GD Tee Vee. The intel services weaponized the term "conspiracy," in order to keep folks like you from considering things that are too awful to consider.
"See political realism for branches and antecedents more relevant to contemporary diplomacy and the particular modern, international relations paradigm.
- Sun Tzu, a Chinese military strategist who wrote The Art of War that foreshadowed elements of Realpolitik developed later.
- Thucydides, a Greek historian who wrote the History of the Peloponnesian War and is also cited as an intellectual forebearer of Realpolitik.
- Chanakya (or Kautilya), an early Indian statesman and writer on the Arthashastra.
- Ibn Khaldun, an Arab historiographer, historian and one of the founding fathers of modern historiography, author of Muqaddimah, a universal history of time.
- Han Fei, a Chinese scholar who theorised Legalism (or Legism) and who served in the court of the King of Qin—later unifier of China ending the Warring States period. His theory centres on the Two Handles (about penalty and rewards as tools of governance). He theorised about a neutral, manipulative ruler who would act as head of state while secretly controlling the executive through his ministers—the ones to take real responsibility for any policy.
- Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian political philosopher who wrote Il Principe (The Prince) in which he held that the sole aim of a prince (politician) was to seek power, regardless of religious or ethical considerations. However, there is scholarly debate about the nature and morality of his advice.
- Cardinal Richelieu, a French statesman who destroyed domestic factionalism and guided France to a position of dominance in foreign affairs.
- Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher who wrote Leviathan in which he stated the state of nature was prone to a "war of all against all".
- Frederick the Great, a Prussian monarch who transformed Prussia into a great European power through warfare and diplomacy.
- Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, a French diplomat who guided France and Europe through a variety of political systems.
- Prince Klemens Wenzel von Metternich, a Koblenz-born Austrian statesman opposed to political revolution.
- Carl von Clausewitz, an 18–19th century Prussian general and military strategist who wrote On War (Vom Kriege).
- Camillo Benso of Cavour, an Italian statesman who diplomatically managed to maneuver the Kingdom of Sardinia to become a new great power in Europe, controlling a nearly united Italy that was five times as large as the Kingdom of Sardinia had been before he came to power.
- Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian statesman who coined the term balance of power. Balancing power means keeping the peace and careful Realpolitik practitioners try to avoid arms races.
- 20th century proponents of political realism include Hans Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger, George F. Kennan, and Charles de Gaulle.
- Mao Zedong's Three Worlds Theory is described as Realpolitik by his critics, including Enver Hoxha, who argue that it was not based on a strong ideological grounding and used only to justify rapport with the West.. . . "
Realpolitik - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Realism (international relations) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Trump was defrauded. Period.
You guys should be smarter than this. You keep coming up with conspiracies to explain why the last conspiracy theory blew up in your faces.They have to believe what they're being told from the propagandists. They can't think for themselves, even the most obvious stuff. Pretty sad but that's what we're dealing with now.
let's take three years and find out.How many votes did China change in the 2020 "stolen election"?
MAGA