Is Water Redistribution To Control Climate Change A Viable Option ?

Is water redistribution to control climate change a viable option ?

  • Water redistribution to control climate change is a viable option .

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Water redistribution to control climate change is not a viable option .

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Water redistribution is too expensive .

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Water redistribution would be effective against wildfires and desertification .

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Water for redistribution is not available .

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
" Preference Is For Progress Slow And Steady "

* Debilitation Of Battle Field Transport Causes Rapid Erosion *

If you mean dumping water on s raging forrest fire thats ok
But seeding the heavens with water to mitigate the global warming disaster hoax the answer is no
The scheme would be to route water to specific outlet locations to affect moisture content in general areas of terrain , rather than seeding the atmosphere with silver nitrates to spawn significant rainfall .

The suggested method of seeding the atmosphere ls to reflect sunlight in the upper atmosphere with confetti .
 
" Preference Is For Progress Slow And Steady "

* Debilitation Of Battle Field Transport Causes Rapid Erosion *


The scheme would be to route water to specific outlet locations to affect moisture content in general areas of terrain , rather than seeding the atmosphere with silver nitrates to spawn significant rainfall .

The suggested method of seeding the atmosphere ls to reflect sunlight in the upper atmosphere with confetti .
It sounds overly ambitious to me

The western states need drinking water and water for agriculture

To me that suggests desalination plants
 
Any government that can ban abortion can also require it [one child limit] ...

I reject that. Abortions require doctors or pharmaceutical companies. Pregnancies require only a man and woman. The ability to enact one is not proof of the ability to enact the other.
 

Forum List

Back
Top