Mississippi School does the right thing: Bans prom due to Lesbian couple attending.

Should Homosexual Sex be Included in 5th Grade Sex Ed?

  • 4.) This is too Deep for me, it's Confusing me, & I Need to Call someone a Name over it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .
How do you know that word is not offensive to anyone when it is used in queer guy?? Did you take a survey or something??

You could read the Wikipedia definition of Queer, or you could Consult Queer Berkeley's website.

I think you're missing the point. I know the definition in the dictionary. It's the perception of what it means that counts. You don't get that???

Yes that's why I quoted from Wikipedia: it discusses the PERCEPTION:

Queer has traditionally meant odd or unusual, though modern use often pertains to LGBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex and non-normative heterosexual) people. Its usage is considered controversial and underwent substantial changes over the course of the 20th Century with some LGBT people re-claiming the term as a means of self-empowerment. The term is still considered by some to be offensive and derisive, and by others as a re-appropriated term used to describe a sexual orientation and/or gender identity or gender expression that does not conform to heteronormative society.


Do you get it?

It is OFTEN USED: "LGBT people reclaim the term AS A MEANS OF SELF-EMPOWERMENT."

As a result, if you search for Queer websites, you'll find all sorts of Queer Organizations that cater to the LGBT "community."
 
You could read the Wikipedia definition of Queer, or you could Consult Queer Berkeley's website.

I think you're missing the point. I know the definition in the dictionary. It's the perception of what it means that counts. You don't get that???

Yes that's why I quoted from Wikipedia: it discusses the PERCEPTION:

Queer has traditionally meant odd or unusual, though modern use often pertains to LGBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex and non-normative heterosexual) people. Its usage is considered controversial and underwent substantial changes over the course of the 20th Century with some LGBT people re-claiming the term as a means of self-empowerment. The term is still considered by some to be offensive and derisive, and by others as a re-appropriated term used to describe a sexual orientation and/or gender identity or gender expression that does not conform to heteronormative society.


Do you get it?

It is OFTEN USED: "LGBT people reclaim the term AS A MEANS OF SELF-EMPOWERMENT."

As a result, if you search for Queer websites, you'll find all sorts of Queer Organizations that cater to the LGBT "community."


but but but.....

It's offensive to Rinata, and that's all that should really count.
 
Since mal is unable to provide proof, I googled a passage from what he claims is in the book and found exactly two other links to the topic aside from this thread.

Interesting.

http://www.denverradio.net/newforum/viewthread.php?tid=1370&page=1#pid4674

Oh, shoot, I closed the other link...anywho, it was basically the same C&P job from someone called "tha malcontent" and posted in 2003 on a different message board.

:lol:

One wonders why mal would carry around this handbook and obsess over gays for all these years.

:eusa_eh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since mal is unable to provide proof, I googled a passage from what he claims is in the book and found exactly two other links to the topic aside from this thread.

Interesting.

Comments & Rumors - Powered by XMB

Oh, shoot, I closed the other link...anywho, it was basically the same C&P job from someone called "tha malcontent" and posted in 2003 on a different message board.

:lol:

One wonders why mal would carry around this handbook and obsess over gays for all these years.

:eusa_eh:

I thought that whole schtick sounded familiar.

Oh, you needn't wonder.
 
"This was a smart move by the Mississippi School District in banning the High School Prom due to a immoral lesbian couple wanting to attend that would taint the event. Here in the south we want southern family MORAL traditions maintained that will carry on in this christian faith based family conservative values region. It is best to mainstain the status quo of boy girl dates. Louisiana did this last year at a prom and banned the same sex couple by sticking to their moral convictions in doing the right thing. This same sex behavior should recieve zero tolerance at all school events."

So much concentrated right wing talking point bullshit can't be good for you.

Do tell me what is immoral about lesbians?
 
Since mal is unable to provide proof, I googled a passage from what he claims is in the book and found exactly two other links to the topic aside from this thread.

Interesting.

Comments & Rumors - Powered by XMB

Oh, shoot, I closed the other link...anywho, it was basically the same C&P job from someone called "tha malcontent" and posted in 2003 on a different message board.

:lol:

One wonders why mal would carry around this handbook and obsess over gays for all these years.

:eusa_eh:

Ah... That's so Cute...

Difficult Question for you to be Honest about, isn't it...

Jeffco Teaches 5th Graders from this Booklet...

I would be MORE than Happy to Document this with someone like Crimson or EZ, but I am CERTAINLY NOT Taking your Bait and Exposing my Source on this on the Open Boards so you can Attack...

Go Fuck yourself, Ravi.

:)

peace...
 
Do tell me what is immoral about lesbians?

Morals are personal and subjective, making this question bogus, irrelevant bait.

You could no sooner objectively explain what is immoral about bank robbery.

Really?

What is immoral about lesbians? I don't know...we don't hurt anyone or their rights. We are not against the law.

What is immoral about bank robbery? It is stealing and takes the property of other people...and could also be physically dangerous. It is against the law.


Glad to have cleared up the OBVIOUS differences for you.
 
Since mal is unable to provide proof, I googled a passage from what he claims is in the book and found exactly two other links to the topic aside from this thread.

Interesting.

Comments & Rumors - Powered by XMB

Oh, shoot, I closed the other link...anywho, it was basically the same C&P job from someone called "tha malcontent" and posted in 2003 on a different message board.

:lol:

One wonders why mal would carry around this handbook and obsess over gays for all these years.

:eusa_eh:

Ah... That's so Cute...

Difficult Question for you to be Honest about, isn't it...

Jeffco Teaches 5th Graders from this Booklet...

I would be MORE than Happy to Document this with someone like Crimson or EZ, but I am CERTAINLY NOT Taking your Bait and Exposing my Source on this on the Open Boards so you can Attack...

Go Fuck yourself, Ravi.

:)

peace...
It's possible the book exists and it's possible some portions of the book are used to instruct fifth graders on puberty. That doesn't mean that the fifth graders are instructed on the ins and outs of intercourse.

You have asserted that sex education is taught to fifth graders in Colorado while offering no proof that it is so.

Until you are able to do so your entire poll is stupid...just like you.

:thup:
 
Since mal is unable to provide proof, I googled a passage from what he claims is in the book and found exactly two other links to the topic aside from this thread.

Interesting.

Comments & Rumors - Powered by XMB

Oh, shoot, I closed the other link...anywho, it was basically the same C&P job from someone called "tha malcontent" and posted in 2003 on a different message board.

:lol:

One wonders why mal would carry around this handbook and obsess over gays for all these years.

:eusa_eh:

Ah... That's so Cute...

Difficult Question for you to be Honest about, isn't it...

Jeffco Teaches 5th Graders from this Booklet...

I would be MORE than Happy to Document this with someone like Crimson or EZ, but I am CERTAINLY NOT Taking your Bait and Exposing my Source on this on the Open Boards so you can Attack...

Go Fuck yourself, Ravi.

:)

peace...
It's possible the book exists and it's possible some portions of the book are used to instruct fifth graders on puberty. That doesn't mean that the fifth graders are instructed on the ins and outs of intercourse.

You have asserted that sex education is taught to fifth graders in Colorado while offering no proof that it is so.

Until you are able to do so your entire poll is stupid...just like you.

:thup:


Pajama-hidin' ? :eusa_eh: Anyone else find that as disturbing as I do?
 
Ah... That's so Cute...

Difficult Question for you to be Honest about, isn't it...

Jeffco Teaches 5th Graders from this Booklet...

I would be MORE than Happy to Document this with someone like Crimson or EZ, but I am CERTAINLY NOT Taking your Bait and Exposing my Source on this on the Open Boards so you can Attack...

Go Fuck yourself, Ravi.

:)

peace...
It's possible the book exists and it's possible some portions of the book are used to instruct fifth graders on puberty. That doesn't mean that the fifth graders are instructed on the ins and outs of intercourse.

You have asserted that sex education is taught to fifth graders in Colorado while offering no proof that it is so.

Until you are able to do so your entire poll is stupid...just like you.

:thup:


Pajama-hidin' ? :eusa_eh: Anyone else find that as disturbing as I do?

Not as Disturbing as your Perverted Ass Targeting Children you Dishonest Hack:

"The Original Gangster of the Pajamahidin"

It's a Variation on this:

Pajamahadeen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Like this:

NOVA Pajamahidin

And you Know it...

Nice Adding the "-" and the "'" in there... Dishonesty Defines you like your Lifestyle Choices do, Bodey.

:)

peace...
 
Hey Bodey... Should the Growing and Changing Book in Jeffco be Changed to be Inclusive of Homosexuals?...

Easy Question... It Excludes them now...

Is that UnConstitutional?...

You can do it... Try.

:)

peace...
 
OctoErotica...you mean like tentacle porn? hahahaha.

As far as the inclination to ask questions about the rug munching, for every kid that's out front and open about sex in an innocent way, I'm betting there are far more that are scared to talk about it.

Add to that that the homosexual ones are being told something that's counter-intuitive and wrong...so I'd cut that question-asking bunch down ....waaaaay down.

I still think that homosexuality isn't a choice. Straight people dont choose to be straight. Every time I see whats-his-face's avatar I get wicked stiff without thinking ;)
 
OctoErotica...you mean like tentacle porn? hahahaha.

As far as the inclination to ask questions about the rug munching, for every kid that's out front and open about sex in an innocent way, I'm betting there are far more that are scared to talk about it.

Add to that that the homosexual ones are being told something that's counter-intuitive and wrong...so I'd cut that question-asking bunch down ....waaaaay down.

I still think that homosexuality isn't a choice. Straight people dont choose to be straight. Every time I see whats-his-face's avatar I get wicked stiff without thinking ;)

It's either a Choice or a Defect...

Homosexuals are Designed by Nature and Equipped to Couple with the Opposite Sex.

If their Defiance is NOT a Choice, then NO Defiance is...

In that, you would Advocate for Beastiality... Because "who would Choose that?"... Correct?

:)

peace...
 
:rolleyes:

Still waiting for your proof, asshole.

Your Denial that the Book even Exists was enough for me to Know that you aren't going to Accept any Proof...

I can give whatever is Needed to an Admin, but I'm not Playing your Trollish Distracting Games any longer, Ravi...

:)

peace...
You're the troll. Provide proof of your assertion that fifth graders are receiving sex ed or stfu. Again, even if the book exists it does not mean intercourse is being taught to fifth graders.

It really shouldn't be hard for you to prove this, and the fact that you can't speaks volumes about your honesty.

Not to mention that Samson's link proved you wrong.
 
:rolleyes:

Still waiting for your proof, asshole.

Your Denial that the Book even Exists was enough for me to Know that you aren't going to Accept any Proof...

I can give whatever is Needed to an Admin, but I'm not Playing your Trollish Distracting Games any longer, Ravi...

:)

peace...
You're the troll. Provide proof of your assertion that fifth graders are receiving sex ed or stfu. Again, even if the book exists it does not mean intercourse is being taught to fifth graders.

It really shouldn't be hard for you to prove this, and the fact that you can't speaks volumes about your honesty.

Not to mention that Samson's link proved you wrong.

Without having you in ALL of the Classes in the County, I can NOT Provide the Proof that you Request...

I can tell you that 5th Graders, (who can READ), are Issued this Book...

So they are given the Materials regardless of what may or may not Happen in any given Class by any Given Teacher, or for that Matter in any Given Community in Jeffco...

The Book Excludes Information for "Homosexual" Children, Assuming they Exist, as Bodey Beleives they do.

This is a Fact.

The Question Remains, is the Exclusion of Homosexuals in this Classroom Text that is Issued to Students in the 5th Grade Discriminatory and UnConstitutional?...

Yes, I Expanded on it, so that Ravi can Know what this is about without Question after this.

I Quoted the Text, and Ravi took Issue with it's Existence and Access to 5th Graders.

I can Prove it is Given to them, and it says what it says.

I can NOT Prove what Happens in EVERY Class in Jeffco with it.

:)

peace...
 
Last edited:
Do tell me what is immoral about lesbians?

Morals are personal and subjective, making this question bogus, irrelevant bait.

You could no sooner objectively explain what is immoral about bank robbery.

Really?

What is immoral about lesbians? I don't know...we don't hurt anyone or their rights. We are not against the law.

What is immoral about bank robbery? It is stealing and takes the property of other people...and could also be physically dangerous. It is against the law.


Glad to have cleared up the OBVIOUS differences for you.

Laws and morality are two different beasts. Your attempts to equate the two make you look like an assclown.

What is immoral about stealing?
 

Forum List

Back
Top