Crick
Gold Member
- May 10, 2014
- 29,385
- 5,712
Yet doctored data means nothing to you.
It might if you could show us some doctored data. But you can't. You can just CLAIM its doctored.
How much grant money do you get?
None, of course. And the claim that scientists get rich from grant money is simply an admission that you know nothing about the grant process (or are dishonest)
Or are you invested in the carbon credit scheme?
Aren't you?
Or other green technologies profiting from government monies?
What would be the relevance if he was? I would say it would indicate he put his money where his mouth was or simply more evidence that he actually does believe we need green technologies.
Or just believe every headline you read without researching their accuracy?
Like the one here claiming Richard Lindzen is some sort of climate expert and that his denialist contentions have some merit?
Last edited: