Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More to the point, they consider themselves morally superior to God, and to be doing much better and more noble works than He does.
Fairness of the U.S. tax system has little to do with reality. Romney pays tax on capital gains, no tax on income... BECAUSE he has no income.EVERYONE who pays the cap gain rate pays it becasue the government understands to some extent, ( some admins more than others) it makes sense to reward RISK. The cap gains issue is a risk reward venture. People will not RISK as much, IF they do not see a commensurate advantage on the back end if successful. And even then before one dime passes to their hands, the government takes a piece via the corporate entity that generated it from the original source.
This whole argument is dishonest without acknowledging that fact.
this is not about that though,imho , its about hammering romney for doing what every single liberal entrepreneur and and investor does too.
Let me ask you a question- how was obamas book proceeds taxed? Do you know? How are the proceeds of that money he earned via those sales used? You think its sitting in 1% interest CD? Does obama have a portfolio where in he has cap gains accrued? has he realized any? What was HIS rate on those gains?
For those that don't know, you are it appears to me employing a very selective form of partisan BS.
I understand about the risk and the reasoning for the lower rate. However, the rate didn't need to be lowered to 15%. People have always invested and they always will. In fact you could make a case that everyone went too far with their risks and helped bring down the economy when the rate was lowered to 15%.
I think book royalties are taxed as regular income, not as a capital gain. I also think he donated his royalties to charity.
But that has nothing to do with the fairness or unfairness of taxing different types of income at different rates.
Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary for a like reason. She pays taxes on income. Buffet pays taxes on capital gains. Not the same tax, just fraudulently used in the SOTU as a ruse.
Fairness of the U.S. tax system has little to do with reality. Romney pays tax on capital gains, no tax on income... BECAUSE he has no income.I understand about the risk and the reasoning for the lower rate. However, the rate didn't need to be lowered to 15%. People have always invested and they always will. In fact you could make a case that everyone went too far with their risks and helped bring down the economy when the rate was lowered to 15%.
I think book royalties are taxed as regular income, not as a capital gain. I also think he donated his royalties to charity.
But that has nothing to do with the fairness or unfairness of taxing different types of income at different rates.
Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary for a like reason. She pays taxes on income. Buffet pays taxes on capital gains. Not the same tax, just fraudulently used in the SOTU as a ruse.
I refuse to discuss Warren Buffett's secretary's tax rate as a settled fact - or at all - until someone show's me the bitch's tax returns so I can see for myself what she gets paid and what amount and type of tax she pays. I'm not taking Buffett's word for it, and I'm SURE AS HELL not taking Obama's word for it.
Lefties, prove it or shut the fuck up about it.
Fairness of the U.S. tax system has little to do with reality. Romney pays tax on capital gains, no tax on income... BECAUSE he has no income.
Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary for a like reason. She pays taxes on income. Buffet pays taxes on capital gains. Not the same tax, just fraudulently used in the SOTU as a ruse.
I refuse to discuss Warren Buffett's secretary's tax rate as a settled fact - or at all - until someone show's me the bitch's tax returns so I can see for myself what she gets paid and what amount and type of tax she pays. I'm not taking Buffett's word for it, and I'm SURE AS HELL not taking Obama's word for it.
Lefties, prove it or shut the fuck up about it.
Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
I refuse to discuss Warren Buffett's secretary's tax rate as a settled fact - or at all - until someone show's me the bitch's tax returns so I can see for myself what she gets paid and what amount and type of tax she pays. I'm not taking Buffett's word for it, and I'm SURE AS HELL not taking Obama's word for it.
Lefties, prove it or shut the fuck up about it.
Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
Fairness of the U.S. tax system has little to do with reality. Romney pays tax on capital gains, no tax on income... BECAUSE he has no income.
Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary for a like reason. She pays taxes on income. Buffet pays taxes on capital gains. Not the same tax, just fraudulently used in the SOTU as a ruse.
I refuse to discuss Warren Buffett's secretary's tax rate as a settled fact - or at all - until someone show's me the bitch's tax returns so I can see for myself what she gets paid and what amount and type of tax she pays. I'm not taking Buffett's word for it, and I'm SURE AS HELL not taking Obama's word for it.
Lefties, prove it or shut the fuck up about it.
Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
10% to his Church.... which is their duty (no one is forced to pay it).
The rest - considerably more - to a vast array of charities.... with absolutely no connection to his church.
Hack.
He gave about 15% of his income to charitable donations, most of which (10%), went to the Mormon Church.
Of course, the Mormon church also puts it's considerable weight behind Romney's major life efforts, so it all works out for him in the end.
Liberal/Statists expect us to take everything on face value...until it fails...then the blame game begins.Fairness of the U.S. tax system has little to do with reality. Romney pays tax on capital gains, no tax on income... BECAUSE he has no income.I understand about the risk and the reasoning for the lower rate. However, the rate didn't need to be lowered to 15%. People have always invested and they always will. In fact you could make a case that everyone went too far with their risks and helped bring down the economy when the rate was lowered to 15%.
I think book royalties are taxed as regular income, not as a capital gain. I also think he donated his royalties to charity.
But that has nothing to do with the fairness or unfairness of taxing different types of income at different rates.
Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary for a like reason. She pays taxes on income. Buffet pays taxes on capital gains. Not the same tax, just fraudulently used in the SOTU as a ruse.
I refuse to discuss Warren Buffett's secretary's tax rate as a settled fact - or at all - until someone show's me the bitch's tax returns so I can see for myself what she gets paid and what amount and type of tax she pays. I'm not taking Buffett's word for it, and I'm SURE AS HELL not taking Obama's word for it.
Lefties, prove it or shut the fuck up about it.
Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
Because HE is a fraud and isn't in real-estate as he says he is, and is living off the gubmint tit...on welfare.What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
So let's go with 50 million
15% of 50 million is 7.5million dollars isn't that enough for one person to pay? Why are you so greedy?
And here's the reporting Stewart was referring to in his show:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/b...ecomes-part-of-the-debate.html?pagewanted=all
thx for posting it.
I just read it, now, how does this sppt. your assertion?
Actually, that article only had a couple of short paragraphs highlighting Stewart's point.
Let me go further.
In 2007, private equity had a record profit year, and congress decided to end the private equity tax break.
Congress Weighs End to Private Equity Tax Break - New York Times
The bipartisan effort was lead by the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus, Democrat from Montana, and Charles Grassley of Iowa, who was the ranking Republican at the time.
Legislation was introduced in June of 2007.
Bill Is Offered to Increase Tax on Private Equity - New York Times
However, after an intense lobbying campaign by "the Private Equity Council", a trade group made up of multiple private equity firms, of which Bain was a leading member, lobbied Congress hard, and Congress suddenly changed it's mind.
Reported lobbying funds given to select members of congress can be found here:
Lobbying Spending Database - Private Equity Council, 2009 | OpenSecrets
And that doesn't include non-reported lobbying, which would be funneled through secondary groups.
The average effective federal income tax rate for taxpayers is 11 percent, I noted in my January 24 post, "Nets Use Romney's Taxes to Advance Obama's False 'Fairness' Narrative," which includes a table showing those earning between $50,000 and $75,000 pay an average effective income tax rate of 7 percent, 8 percent for those taking in $75,000 to $100,000 and 12 percent for those between $100,000 and $200,000.
No matter what Buffett pays her, if she's paying 35.8 percent she has an awful accountant. More likely, she's paying a lot less, maybe even at a lower rate than Romney since, as USA Today reported last week, "he's paying a higher tax rate than the majority of taxpayers."
Warren Buffett's Secretary Speaks - WSJ.com
Why would the RICH need Welfare?Shut the fuck up yourself.
Wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital.
Welfare for the idle rich has to stop.
What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
So let's go with 50 million
15% of 50 million is 7.5million dollars isn't that enough for one person to pay? Why are you so greedy?
Why would the RICH need Welfare?What is the sum of 15%? Instead of saying what a person pay by percentage what is the sum total of that percentage?
Percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
You realize you torpedo your own statement?
YOU are stuck on Class warfare. Admit it. YOU are envious of success while YOU fail in your own life.
Get a job loser.
percentage is all that counts.
No more welfare for the idle rich.
so let's go with 50 million
15% of 50 million is 7.5million dollars isn't that enough for one person to pay? Why are you so greedy?
so by underpaying romney is cheating the government out of millions of dollars.
No more welfare for the idle rich.