MN ban on 18-20yrs old concealed carry: Unconstitutional

[M14 Shooter]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.194951/gov.uscourts.mnd.194951.84.0.pdf

Katherine Menendez, Biden appointee.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 40] is GRANTED IN
PART;
2. Judgment is granted to Plaintiffs on the issue of whether Minn. Stat.
§ 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2), violates the right of the individual Plaintiffs and the
otherwise-qualified 18–20-year-old members of MGOC, SAF, and FPC to
keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second and Fourteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution;
a. The Court declares that Minn. Stat. § 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2)’s
requirement that a person must be at least 21 years of age to receive a
permit to publicly carry a handgun in Minnesota violates the rights of
individuals 18–20 years old to keep and bear arms protected by the
Second and Fourteenth Amendments; and
b. Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the 21-year minimum-age
requirement in Minn. Stat. § 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2), against the
individual Plaintiffs and otherwise-qualified 18–20-year-olds;
3. Commissioner Harrington’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 45] is
DENIED; and
4. Sheriffs Lorge, Wolbersen, and Starry’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Doc. 52] is DENIED

I wonder if our Biden-appointed judge was honest, or didn't want to be overturned on appeal.

I expect this to continue, in our glorious post-Bruen world.

 

[jotathought]

can 18 - 20 year olds get life altering genital surgery or hormone therapy?

 

[Auld Phart]

Can't buy a handgun til age 21, but allowed to CC one?

 

[Donald H]

It will be a partial short term solution to the gun problem but it's still not addressing the main issue of a 'culture' of violence, killing, and war that has permeated America's society.

And denial of weapons to young men in their formative years could turn out to be counter productive to young American men's attitudes.

I'm suggesting that no control is better than avoiding to address the main problem that motivates young men to thinking they need a handgun or a military style copy of an assault weapon. ( in black)

 

[AMart]

Can't buy a handgun til age 21, but allowed to CC one?

Correct. Surprised that the federal law requiring one to be 21 to purchase from a dealer is still intact.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Correct. Surprised that the federal law requiring one to be 21 to purchase from a dealer is still intact.

It takes some time to run these things through the courts.

 

[Donald H]

When even gun related threads struggle to fill a full page, there's something wrong and going south in a hurry around here!

 

[Concerned American]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.194951/gov.uscourts.mnd.194951.84.0.pdf

Katherine Menendez, Biden appointee.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 40] is GRANTED IN
PART;
2. Judgment is granted to Plaintiffs on the issue of whether Minn. Stat.
§ 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2), violates the right of the individual Plaintiffs and the
otherwise-qualified 18–20-year-old members of MGOC, SAF, and FPC to
keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second and Fourteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution;
a. The Court declares that Minn. Stat. § 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2)’s
requirement that a person must be at least 21 years of age to receive a
permit to publicly carry a handgun in Minnesota violates the rights of
individuals 18–20 years old to keep and bear arms protected by the
Second and Fourteenth Amendments; and
b. Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the 21-year minimum-age
requirement in Minn. Stat. § 624.714, subd. 2(b)(2), against the
individual Plaintiffs and otherwise-qualified 18–20-year-olds;
3. Commissioner Harrington’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 45] is
DENIED; and
4. Sheriffs Lorge, Wolbersen, and Starry’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Doc. 52] is DENIED

I wonder if our Biden-appointed judge was honest, or didn't want to be overturned on appeal.

I expect this to continue, in our glorious post-Bruen world.

WA has an identical law that they just foisted on us--seems this sets the precedent.

 

[jwoodie]

This is why the legal age of citizenship should be restored to 21.

 

[Donald H]

His avatar is clearly illustrative of the problem that still won't be addressed. It's clearly an attempt to display the exact opposite of what the proponents of military style rifles don't want to be publicly known.

His AR-15 is only a substitute for a tank and he won't attain a satisfying degree of potency without it.

The good guys with guns who become the bad guys with guns are feeling that they lack potency with their AR's lying silently in the corner gathering dust.

At least nobody should be missing the message of a yearning for greater force with the tank. It's at least temporary potency to an unsatisfying level.

 

[M14 Shooter]

WA has an identical law that they just foisted on us--seems this sets the precedent

It doesnt set a precedent in the 9th circuit - no telling what the leftist whackos out there will do.

 

[M14 Shooter]

This is why the legal age of citizenship should be restored to 21.

Thus too, the voting age.

 

[Concerned American]

At least nobody should be missing the message of a yearning for greater force with the tank. It's at least temporary potency to an unsatisfying level.

Do you ever engage your brain before you type this incoherent claptrap, duck? Your assertion is moronic on its face as US citizens can already legally own tanks. Moron. Can Civilians Own Military Tanks? | Military Excess

 

[Concerned American]

It doesnt set a precedent in the 9th circuit - no telling what the leftist whackos out there will do.

In our current "land of no consistent laws" you are probably correct. This is only a scratching the surface of what will happen if the globalists get their way.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Do you ever engage your brain before you type this incoherent claptrap, duck?

No. He's trolling. Poorly.
Best thing to do is point and laugh.

 

[pknopp]

The permit part is what is unconstitutional. If you have to get the governments permission to exercise your right, you don't actually have that right.