Againsheila
Gold Member
I don't understand your point. Household income is household income regardless of the size of the household. If you are insinuating that fewer people in a household are working now, I think that's unlikely since more and more women (wives) have gone to work it seems that more of the lower classes are worker, not fewer. This would make the chart even worse than it looks.
I'm not surprised that you don't get it. That's why you're a liberal.
If household income has to be shared among fewer people, then those people are relatively wealthier.
I grew up in a family with 7 children. Nowadays, families with more than 2 children are rare. According to you, if both families bring in 100K per year, they are both equally well off. You have to be a moron to believe that.
Also, a lot more families consist of single mothers or just plain single people. According to your lame understanding of economics, a single person making 100K is no better off than a family of 4 bringing in 100K.
I could go on, but that should suffice to show the flaw in your chart.
It's not my chart, and I'm not a liberal. I grew up in a family with 5 children. My neighbor has 8. Guess what? It's cheaper by the dozen. Ie, the more you have, the cheaper they are.
Oh, and while European Americans have limited their children to replacement value, immigrants, 1st and 2nd generation, of which we have millions, have an average of 7.5 kids per family.