More Rush...why the left is envious...

[francoHFW]

I believe it- same 50% of Pub dupes who believe ACORN stole the election, Obama is Muslim Kenyan Marxist, think Fox Pundits speak truth, my sig pp3, etc etc

 

[Big Fitz]

No. But what an interesting journey you took.

By the way; why did he apologize.

False apologies are common in today's society. So?

Which statement is the lie?

1. Rush is an inconsequential shock jock who should not be taken seriously or at face value?

2. Rush is the leader of the republicans and conservative movement who's opinion can spark hatred across the nation and swing elections?

Which is true? Both cannot be true.

Sure they can. Why not?

You do understand the concept of mutual exclusion, yes?

 

[francoHFW]

Nope...sounds like dittohead Pubcrappe LOL Try English...

 

[francoHFW]

Since Pub and conservative voters are ignorant fools, it's true. See?

Great job, Pubbies!

 

[Neotrotsky]

When will this tool realize
he is being ignored

 

[edthecynic]

overall weekly audience of more than 40 million and which more than 1 in 8 Americans describe as “very credible.”

Yup, the same brainwashed morons...We're just sick to death of lying RW demagogue/haters/propagandists ruining the country...

Yeah, I've yet to see proof that his audience is that big. Verifiable proof. You know - something other than Rush saying so.

The Stuttering LimpBoy's "say so" actually proves him a liar!

In 2011 he claimed his audience was over 40 million per day, but after his slut rants he claims his 22 million audience is the largest it's ever been. So basically he's a pathological liar who lost half his audience while claiming his audience has grown.

The Doctor of Duplicity is the perfect contrarian indicator, whatever he says the opposite is true!!!

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.

March 28, 2012
RUSH: We haven't lost any audience in this program.* The audience is larger than it's ever been... But the advertisers who've really been hurt are the ones who've abandoned here. I just assume everybody understood that. Let me tell you: We have 22 million people here who have stopped patronizing these people, stopped patronizing them. It's major in many instances, the harm that has been inflicted.

 

[BDBoop]

False apologies are common in today's society. So?

Which statement is the lie?

1. Rush is an inconsequential shock jock who should not be taken seriously or at face value?

2. Rush is the leader of the republicans and conservative movement who's opinion can spark hatred across the nation and swing elections?

Which is true? Both cannot be true.

Sure they can. Why not?

You do understand the concept of mutual exclusion, yes?

You do understand the concept of many people having different perceptions, yes?

 

[Taylee]

Rush is laughing all the way to his several (dozen?) banks...since every time the left raises a stink about him, it backfires and only gives Rush more fans and supporters.

What the left is too duh-uh to comprehend is.....we don't agree with Rush. Rush agrees with us, and voices/vocalizes OUR ideas, opinions and political views. Plus, he's not afraid to lay it on the line and speak the truth about Obama, unlike the main/lamestream media. That's an enticing combination. For anyone but a leftie, that is.....since lefties have a natural aversion to the truth.

 

[BDBoop]

Rush is laughing all the way to his several (dozen?) banks...since every time the left raises a stink about him, it backfires and only gives Rush more fans and supporters.

What the left is too duh-uh to comprehend is.....we don't agree with Rush. Rush agrees with us, and voices/vocalizes OUR ideas, opinions and political views. Plus, he's not afraid to lay it on the line and speak the truth about Obama, unlike the main/lamestream media. That's an enticing combination. For anyone but a leftie, that is.....since lefties have a natural aversion to the truth.

Wow. How embarrassing was it to admit THAT.

 

[Taylee]

Actually...it doesn't embarrass me at all to admit that lefties have a natural aversion to the truth. In fact, I make that observation quite often. Thanks for your concern though.

Rush is laughing all the way to his several (dozen?) banks...since every time the left raises a stink about him, it backfires and only gives Rush more fans and supporters.

What the left is too duh-uh to comprehend is.....we don't agree with Rush. Rush agrees with us, and voices/vocalizes OUR ideas, opinions and political views. Plus, he's not afraid to lay it on the line and speak the truth about Obama, unlike the main/lamestream media. That's an enticing combination. For anyone but a leftie, that is.....since lefties have a natural aversion to the truth.

Wow. How embarrassing was it to admit THAT.

 

[BDBoop]

Okay, blondie.

 

[Big Fitz]

Sure they can. Why not?

You do understand the concept of mutual exclusion, yes?

You do understand the concept of many people having different perceptions, yes?

Perceptions aren't fact and can often be wrong. It's why illusion works.

Rush cannot be inconsequential and the leader of millions. Which is true? Or are you really trying to say that millions of people are inconsequential? If that's the case, please explain Oprah.

 

[Foxfyre]

You do understand the concept of mutual exclusion, yes?

You do understand the concept of many people having different perceptions, yes?

Perceptions aren't fact and can often be wrong. It's why illusion works.

Rush cannot be inconsequential and the leader of millions. Which is true? Or are you really trying to say that millions of people are inconsequential? If that's the case, please explain Oprah.

You know, I've seen Rush trashed and bashed on numerous threads and on myriad message boards. He is accused of being the leader of the Republican party, which is absurd considering the track record as I have explained earlier, and also of being inconsequential, which as you have pointed out is an oxymoron if he is also influential .

He has been descxribed in the most hateful and despicable terms and probably most of the other negative or derogatory adjectives in the English language. (Maybe in other languages too, I don't know.) He is denounced and blasted for how he phrases something, for the metaphors and terminology he uses, etc. etc. etc. Sometimes the criticisms are valid. Most often they are not. Probably more red herrings, straw men, non sequiturs, and flat out lies have been written about Rush Limbaugh than any other figure except for maybe George W. Bush.

But I don't believe I have ever seen a progressive/liberal/leftist/Democrat actually take a statement or point of view that Rush has expressed and articulate an objective argument for why he was wrong or off base.

Is there a progressive capable of doing that? I wonder.

 

[edthecynic]

overall weekly audience of more than 40 million and which more than 1 in 8 Americans describe as “very credible.”

Yup, the same brainwashed morons...We're just sick to death of lying RW demagogue/haters/propagandists ruining the country...

Yeah, I've yet to see proof that his audience is that big. Verifiable proof. You know - something other than Rush saying so.

The Stuttering LimpBoy's "say so" actually proves him a liar!

In 2011 he claimed his audience was over 40 million per day, but after his slut rants he claims his 22 million audience is the largest it's ever been. So basically he's a pathological liar who lost half his audience while claiming his audience has grown.

The Doctor of Duplicity is the perfect contrarian indicator, whatever he says the opposite is true!!!

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.

March 28, 2012
RUSH: We haven't lost any audience in this program.* The audience is larger than it's ever been... But the advertisers who've really been hurt are the ones who've abandoned here. I just assume everybody understood that. Let me tell you: We have 22 million people here who have stopped patronizing these people, stopped patronizing them. It's major in many instances, the harm that has been inflicted.

You do understand the concept of many people having different perceptions, yes?

Perceptions aren't fact and can often be wrong. It's why illusion works.

Rush cannot be inconsequential and the leader of millions. Which is true? Or are you really trying to say that millions of people are inconsequential? If that's the case, please explain Oprah.

You know, I've seen Rush trashed and bashed on numerous threads and on myriad message boards. He is accused of being the leader of the Republican party, which is absurd considering the track record as I have explained earlier, and also of being inconsequential, which as you have pointed out is an oxymoron if he is also influential .

He has been descxribed in the most hateful and despicable terms and probably most of the other negative or derogatory adjectives in the English language. (Maybe in other languages too, I don't know.) He is denounced and blasted for how he phrases something, for the metaphors and terminology he uses, etc. etc. etc. Sometimes the criticisms are valid. Most often they are not. Probably more red herrings, straw men, non sequiturs, and flat out lies have been written about Rush Limbaugh than any other figure except for maybe George W. Bush.

But I don't believe I have ever seen a progressive/liberal/leftist/Democrat actually take a statement or point of view that Rush has expressed and articulate an objective argument for why he was wrong or off base.

Is there a progressive capable of doing that? I wonder.

Bullshit!

I have made a fool of your MessiahRushie with his OWN contradictory statements so often on this board that most of the DittoNutzis here now deny ever listening to the pathological liar. Just check the above post from this very thread, he was either lying about the 40 million per day or he was lying about his audience never being larger than the 22 million after his slut rant. Both statements can't be true!!!

 

[Foxfyre]

Thanks Ed. I can always count on you to make my case.

 

[BDBoop]

overall weekly audience of more than 40 million and which more than 1 in 8 Americans describe as “very credible.”

Yup, the same brainwashed morons...We're just sick to death of lying RW demagogue/haters/propagandists ruining the country...

The Stuttering LimpBoy's "say so" actually proves him a liar!

In 2011 he claimed his audience was over 40 million per day, but after his slut rants he claims his 22 million audience is the largest it's ever been. So basically he's a pathological liar who lost half his audience while claiming his audience has grown.

The Doctor of Duplicity is the perfect contrarian indicator, whatever he says the opposite is true!!!

May 26, 2011
RUSH:. According to reports at the peak of The Oprah's popularity, her show had 40 million weekly viewers. Now, that's not bad. That's almost as many as we have every day here. So our hat's off to The Oprah, 40 million viewers a week, not bad.

March 28, 2012
RUSH: We haven't lost any audience in this program.* The audience is larger than it's ever been... But the advertisers who've really been hurt are the ones who've abandoned here. I just assume everybody understood that. Let me tell you: We have 22 million people here who have stopped patronizing these people, stopped patronizing them. It's major in many instances, the harm that has been inflicted.

Perceptions aren't fact and can often be wrong. It's why illusion works.

Rush cannot be inconsequential and the leader of millions. Which is true? Or are you really trying to say that millions of people are inconsequential? If that's the case, please explain Oprah.

You know, I've seen Rush trashed and bashed on numerous threads and on myriad message boards. He is accused of being the leader of the Republican party, which is absurd considering the track record as I have explained earlier, and also of being inconsequential, which as you have pointed out is an oxymoron if he is also influential .

He has been descxribed in the most hateful and despicable terms and probably most of the other negative or derogatory adjectives in the English language. (Maybe in other languages too, I don't know.) He is denounced and blasted for how he phrases something, for the metaphors and terminology he uses, etc. etc. etc. Sometimes the criticisms are valid. Most often they are not. Probably more red herrings, straw men, non sequiturs, and flat out lies have been written about Rush Limbaugh than any other figure except for maybe George W. Bush.

But I don't believe I have ever seen a progressive/liberal/leftist/Democrat actually take a statement or point of view that Rush has expressed and articulate an objective argument for why he was wrong or off base.

Is there a progressive capable of doing that? I wonder.

Bullshit!

I have made a fool of your MessiahRushie with his OWN contradictory statements so often on this board that most of the DittoNutzis here now deny ever listening to the pathological liar. Just check the above post from this very thread, he was either lying about the 40 million per day or he was lying about his audience never being larger than the 22 million after his slut rant. Both statements can't be true!!!

Yes, I often wonder about that one. And why are his ratings such a closely-guarded secret?

 

[edthecynic]

Thanks Ed. I can always count on you to make my case.

Just like I can always count on you to play dumb.
Thank you.

 

[edthecynic]

But I don't believe I have ever seen a progressive/liberal/leftist/Democrat actually take a statement or point of view that Rush has expressed and articulate an objective argument for why he was wrong or off base.

Is there a progressive capable of doing that? I wonder.

OK, here's another one.

Not one molecule of CO2 in the entire universe has ever come from H2O!!!!!!!

Is that articulate and objective enough for you as to why your MessiahRushie is wrong or off base?????

April 3, 2007
RUSH: Mark my brilliant words on this. That's how this stuff starts. Now, the question is: is CO2 even a pollutant? Is it an air pollutant? Because if it is, then all the water vapor on this planet is a pollutant. The vast majority of CO2 that's in the atmosphere comes from water vapor.

 

[BDBoop]

But I don't believe I have ever seen a progressive/liberal/leftist/Democrat actually take a statement or point of view that Rush has expressed and articulate an objective argument for why he was wrong or off base.

Is there a progressive capable of doing that? I wonder.

OK, here's another one.

Not one molecule of CO2 in the entire universe has ever come from H2O!!!!!!!

Is that articulate and objective enough for you as to why your MessiahRushie is wrong or off base?????

April 3, 2007
RUSH: Mark my brilliant words on this. That's how this stuff starts. Now, the question is: is CO2 even a pollutant? Is it an air pollutant? Because if it is, then all the water vapor on this planet is a pollutant. The vast majority of CO2 that's in the atmosphere comes from water vapor.

And here's another nother one.

Dear Rush;

Women don't need to take a pill every time they have sex. Just one a day. It's not like your Viagra.

Love,

Boop

 

[francoHFW]

Totally dishonest propagandist/hater/demagogue, spreading hate and BS, bought off dj/drug addict tool of the greedy rich. A disaster for the country. And especially for the fools who believe- they are an embarassment in polite society...lol