'Mounting Evidence' Boston Bombers Involved in 2011 Triple Murder

[CaféAuLait]

'Mounting Evidence' Boston Bombers Involved in 2011 Triple Murder


Massachusetts investigators have developed what they call "mounting evidence," bolstered by "forensic hits," that point to the possible involvement of both Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his younger brother Dzhokhar in a gruesome, unsolved triple homicide in 2011, law enforcement officials told ABC News...

Now law enforcement officials tell ABC News that some crime scene forensic evidence provided a match to the two Tsarnaev brothers. The officials also said records of cell phones used by the Tsarnaevs appears to put them in the area of the murders on that date. Several officials confirmed the new findings but declined to be identified because they are not authorized to comment on the ongoing investigation.


'Mounting Evidence' Boston Bombers Involved in 2011 Triple Murder - ABC News


So it seems that both brothers not just the older one may have been involved in this gruesome triple murder.

 

[Granny]

There are so many threads about this subject that this particular thread may not be the right place but I just learned tonight that the brother who was killed has been buried in a Muslim cemetery in Doswell, VA today. Doswell is a small town maybe about 25 miles north of Richmond. No one had a heads up on this - not the State Police, the county Sheriff or anyone else. Now they're going to have to figure out some security measures, at least for the present, since this has just come to light.

 

[CaféAuLait]

There are so many threads about this subject that this particular thread may not be the right place but I just learned tonight that the brother who was killed has been buried in a Muslim cemetery in Doswell, VA today. Doswell is a small town maybe about 25 miles north of Richmond. No one had a heads up on this - not the State Police, the county Sheriff or anyone else. Now they're going to have to figure out some security measures, at least for the present, since this has just come to light.

I wonder if he was given a headstone with the correct name? I just found this article:


Virginia county officials say they’re trying to determine if laws broken in Marathon bombing suspect’s secret burial

Lippa has stationed a deputy sheriff at the cemetery, but Lippa wouldn’t say how long the deputy would stay there. He noted that defaming a plot in a cemetery is a felony. “Are we taking security measures?” Lippa said. “I can assure you we are.”

Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev is buried in Doswell, Virginia, according to two sources - Boston.com

And now taxpayers are paying to have his grave protected. I think he should have been buried at sea just like Bin Laden.

 

[Granny]

Yeah ... that burial at sea thought crossed my mind as well.

Apparently some local woman from Doswell set this thing in motion because she thought it was the right thing to do (or something along those lines). She said she made a few phone calls and that she had no regrets about it. If I can, I'll add a link to the local newspaper here.

Let's see if this works:
http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/latest-news/article_205f4f26-b986-11e2-bafa-001a4bcf6878.html

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States? Not to mention the possibility people might try to steal the body to create some kind of incident with Muslims. There is just too much wrong with burying a terrorist in any public US cemetery. Maybe a prison yard or something, but not where more innocent people are at risk.

Cremation and scattering the ashes at sea or just burial at sea removes all that. And it isn't too late for that.

 

[Sunshine]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States? Not to mention the possibility people might try to steal the body to create some kind of incident with Muslims. There is just too much wrong with burying a terrorist in any public US cemetery. Maybe a prison yard or something, but not where more innocent people are at risk.

Cremation and scattering the ashes at sea or just burial at sea removes all that. And it isn't too late for that.

Bu....bu...bu...cremation is against his religion. Apparently murder is not. The muslim cemetery that accepted him should pay for the security. They fucking don't even have a guard at the grave of JFK.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States? Not to mention the possibility people might try to steal the body to create some kind of incident with Muslims. There is just too much wrong with burying a terrorist in any public US cemetery. Maybe a prison yard or something, but not where more innocent people are at risk.

Cremation and scattering the ashes at sea or just burial at sea removes all that. And it isn't too late for that.

Bu....bu...bu...cremation is against his religion. Apparently murder is not. The muslim cemetery that accepted him should pay for the security. They fucking don't even have a guard at the grave of JFK.

Absolutely.

Maybe it is time for a national legal protocol for the disposal of remains of terrorists ending up dead by whatever means? A one-size-fits-all protocol that specifically prohibits religious considerations.

 

[Pogo]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States? Not to mention the possibility people might try to steal the body to create some kind of incident with Muslims. There is just too much wrong with burying a terrorist in any public US cemetery. Maybe a prison yard or something, but not where more innocent people are at risk.

Cremation and scattering the ashes at sea or just burial at sea removes all that. And it isn't too late for that.

Bu....bu...bu...cremation is against his religion. Apparently murder is not. The muslim cemetery that accepted him should pay for the security. They fucking don't even have a guard at the grave of JFK.

Absolutely.

Maybe it is time for a national legal protocol for the disposal of remains of terrorists ending up dead by whatever means? A one-size-fits-all protocol that specifically prohibits religious considerations.

Let's not play loosely with the term "terrorism". Murder is not by itself terrorism. Neither is Islam. Murderers do not become "terrorists" because they're Muslim but stay "murderers" if they're not. That's absurd.

 

[blastoff]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States? Not to mention the possibility people might try to steal the body to create some kind of incident with Muslims. There is just too much wrong with burying a terrorist in any public US cemetery. Maybe a prison yard or something, but not where more innocent people are at risk.

Cremation and scattering the ashes at sea or just burial at sea removes all that. And it isn't too late for that.

Bu....bu...bu...cremation is against his religion. Apparently murder is not. The muslim cemetery that accepted him should pay for the security. They fucking don't even have a guard at the grave of JFK.

Absolutely.

Maybe it is time for a national legal protocol for the disposal of remains of terrorists ending up dead by whatever means? A one-size-fits-all protocol that specifically prohibits religious considerations.

Just grind 'em up into sort of a meal and feed them to the pigs. From whence they will eventually emerge in the form of pig crap, albeit much devalued due to its content.

 

[J.E.D]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States?

So, Obama should step into a private matter and tell them what they can and can't do?

Then the wingnut brigade would bitch that he's putting his nose where it doesn't belong.

 

[Sunshine]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States?

So, Obama should step into a private matter and tell them what they can and can't do?

Then the wingnut brigade would bitch that he's putting his nose where it doesn't belong.

Given that there are laws regarding burial, it is not a private matter. That has been proven and validated by the SCOTUS ruling that the WBC can picket funerals.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Doswell, Virginia is best known as the location of Meadow Farms, where Secretariat, Riva Ridge, and many other champion thoroughbreds were born.

The Meadow Farms property is now the new location of the Virginia State Fairgrounds, and many of the Meadow Farms stables and the main residence have been preserved.

Unfortunately, Doswell will now be known as the place where a scum-sucking murdering terrorist is buried.

The hallowed ground that produced and housed so much beauty has been turned into a cesspool of inhumanity.

 

[J.E.D]

What is the Obama administration doing, allowing some kind of shrine to terrorism to be created in the United States?

So, Obama should step into a private matter and tell them what they can and can't do?

Then the wingnut brigade would bitch that he's putting his nose where it doesn't belong.

Given that there are laws regarding burial, it is not a private matter. That has been proven and validated by the SCOTUS ruling that the WBC can picket funerals.

It certainly is a private matter. Putting limits on how close WBC can get to a funeral service is a lot different than telling a family where they can bury their loved ones.

Terrorist or not, he had family, and they don't want the gov't telling them where their son can be buried. And you shouldn't want that either.

 

[Sunshine]

So, Obama should step into a private matter and tell them what they can and can't do?

Then the wingnut brigade would bitch that he's putting his nose where it doesn't belong.

Given that there are laws regarding burial, it is not a private matter. That has been proven and validated by the SCOTUS ruling that the WBC can picket funerals.

It certainly is a private matter. Putting limits on how close WBC can get to a funeral service is a lot different than telling a family where they can bury their loved ones.

Terrorist or not, he had family, and they don't want the gov't telling them where their son can be buried. And you shouldn't want that either.

Hate to tell ya, but with the exception of paupers fields and prisons, cemeteries are private property. The lots are generally sold for money and you can't just bop in and plant somebody there. His wife didn't want him. If his mamma had wanted him, she could have paid his airfare back to Russia.


You are right, I don't want that for my family. That is why we purchased the family cemetery plots for my husband, already there, me and our childen. DUH! That way we could all be buried together.

 

[Sunshine]

I can't believe people on here are so ignorant of how getting a body disposed of in this country works.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

Bu....bu...bu...cremation is against his religion. Apparently murder is not. The muslim cemetery that accepted him should pay for the security. They fucking don't even have a guard at the grave of JFK.

Absolutely.

Maybe it is time for a national legal protocol for the disposal of remains of terrorists ending up dead by whatever means? A one-size-fits-all protocol that specifically prohibits religious considerations.

Let's not play loosely with the term "terrorism". Murder is not by itself terrorism. Neither is Islam. Murderers do not become "terrorists" because they're Muslim but stay "murderers" if they're not. That's absurd.

These two filthy god damned Moslem scum are terrorists.

Setting off a bomb in a crowd is terrorism.

Period, the end. Case closed.

Next.

 

[Missourian]

IMO, regardless of what kind of miserable sumbitch a person is and regardless of what they've done, everyone deserves a decent burial.

The burial is much more for the family than the person being buried.

In this respect, I totally agree with the woman who arraigned the burial...this fellow has already answered for his crimes in the presence of the Final Arbitrator...vengeance is His.

I'm glad someone showed compassion for his family, and found a location willing to inter his remains.

 

[J.E.D]

Given that there are laws regarding burial, it is not a private matter. That has been proven and validated by the SCOTUS ruling that the WBC can picket funerals.

It certainly is a private matter. Putting limits on how close WBC can get to a funeral service is a lot different than telling a family where they can bury their loved ones.

Terrorist or not, he had family, and they don't want the gov't telling them where their son can be buried. And you shouldn't want that either.

Hate to tell ya, but with the exception of paupers fields and prisons, cemeteries are private property. The lots are generally sold for money and you can't just bop in and plant somebody there. His wife didn't want him. If his mamma had wanted him, she could have paid his airfare back to Russia.


You are right, I don't want that for my family. That is why we purchased the family cemetery plots for my husband, already there, me and our childen. DUH! That way we could all be buried together.

As I said, it's a private matter. Your point?

 

[Pogo]

Absolutely.

Maybe it is time for a national legal protocol for the disposal of remains of terrorists ending up dead by whatever means? A one-size-fits-all protocol that specifically prohibits religious considerations.

Let's not play loosely with the term "terrorism". Murder is not by itself terrorism. Neither is Islam. Murderers do not become "terrorists" because they're Muslim but stay "murderers" if they're not. That's absurd.

These two filthy god damned Moslem scum are terrorists.

Setting off a bomb in a crowd is terrorism.

Period, the end. Case closed.

Next.

No, actually it isn't. Not without a cause behind it.
This was mass murder, senseless, random and pointless. Terrorism always has a point; a symbolic target. Boston didn't. And if the OP inkling about the 2011 murder (remember that?) is true, it just underscores the dearth of a pattern. There's nothing to be gained politically by killing marathon runners or pizza deliverers. Just doesn't add up.

No message = not terrorism as we define it. Now case closed.

 

[CaféAuLait]

Seems the Boston terrorists did kill these men along with the man the FBI had to shoot earlier today.

Source: Man killed by FBI agent 'directly involved' in murders, knew Tsarnaevs


Source: Man killed by FBI agent knew Tsarnaevs, tied to triple murder - CNN.com


Ibragim Todashev implicated Tsarnaev, himself in triple homicide before FBI shooting

Ibragim Todashev implicated Tsarnaev, himself in triple homicide before FBI shooting - CBS News



So these three people were granted asylum came here murdered at least 6 people.