Another example of MSM Bias...
MSM Network coverage DNC 13 hours 21 minutes..... GOP..... 9 hours 47 minutes
40% MORE TIME for Democrats!
https://www.gop.com/unequal-convent...ter_key=author__slug&filter_value=sean-spicer
WHY????
View attachment 83500
And the Left wonder why there is such demand for alternatives such as Fox. The Left is in utter denial that NBC, CBS, ABC,CNN, MSNBC, and taxpayer-funded PBS are even the least bit biased. Fox is biased but it presents more views from the Left.
You are 100% correct. Yes Fox IS biased ... but it also has more left/democrat supporters then any other of the above!
Juan Williams, Julie Regularsky, Dennis Kucinich YES! Most progressive commentator! All on Fox... so where are the equivalent on the above?
Plus what else can be said for the above networks when these two studies PROVE the bias in MSM...
AGAIN Biased MSM who voted with their pocketbooks for Obama in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than
$1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!
And here is a personal anecdote about one of those MSM editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.
He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play
RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"
I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election