Mueller Investigating Trump Over $150K Donation From Ukrainian Who Gave Clintons $13 Million

[del]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

 

[bripat9643]

This shows the utter bias and hypocrisy of the Mueller investigation. He goes after Trump for stuff that the Clinton administration did 50 times worse, and he utterly ignores any criminal activity by Clinton and her cronies.

Trump should fire this douchebag now.

Mueller Investigating Trump Over $150K Donation From Ukrainian Who Gave Clintons $13 Million​

The special counsel’s office is investigating a $150,000 donation a Ukrainian businessman made to President Donald Trump’s charity in 2015, according to a new report.

The donation, from steel magnate Victor Pinchuk, pales in comparison to contributions he gave to the charity Bill and Hillary Clinton set up. The billionaire has contributed $13 million to the Clinton Foundation since 2006 and had access to Hillary Clinton while she served as secretary of state.

But Special Counsel Robert Mueller is not investigating The Clintons. Instead, he is conducting a broad investigation of Donald Trump, including the flow of foreign money into various Trump-controlled entities.

Mueller began investigating the Pinchuk donation after receiving documents in response to a subpoena issued to the Trump Organization — the real estate company Trump ran before entering politics.

In September 2015, Trump appeared via video link at a conference Pinchuk hosted in Kiev. Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, negotiated details of the event with Douglas Schoen, a former consultant for Bill Clinton, according to The New York Times. Trump did not initially request payment for the appearance, but Cohen contacted Schoen at one point to request a $150,000 honorarium, The Times reported.​

^ ignores the many, many times Clinton and the Clinton foundation have been investigated

The Clinton Foundation hasn't ever been investigated, and Clinton deserved to be investigated. The whitewater operation was a scam, and they defrauded the taxpayers to get a bank they used bailed out.

They’re investigating it as we speak. But you want to play the victim card so you can’t say that.

A special counsel is investigating the Clinton Foundation? What's his name?

why does it have to be a special counsel, did hillary fire the top investigator like trump did with comey???

Because a special counsel can indict people and issue subpoenas, dingbat.

 

[Valerie]

TRUMP is the one who is SHAMELESSLY attacking our country.

Trump again at war with 'deep state' Justice Department

 

[basquebromance]

"The gloves are off. Trump is done playing nice with Mueller and Rosenstein. Major changes coming by Friday" - wacky jack posobiec

 

[Valerie]

9-13.000 - Obtaining Evidence | USAM | Department of Justice

U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys' Manual » Title 9: Criminal

9-13.420 - Searches of Premises of Subject Attorneys
NOTE: For purposes of this policy only, "subject" includes an attorney who is a "suspect, subject or target," or an attorney who is related by blood or marriage to a suspect, or who is believed to be in possession of contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime. This policy also applies to searches of business organizations where such searches involve materials in the possession of individuals serving in the capacity of legal advisor to the organization. Search warrants for "documentary materials" held by an attorney who is a "disinterested third party" (that is, any attorney who is not a subject) are governed by 28 C.F.R. 59.4 and USAM 9-19.221 et seq. See also 42 U.S.C. Section 2000aa-11(a)(3).

There are occasions when effective law enforcement may require the issuance of a search warrant for the premises of an attorney who is a subject of an investigation, and who also is or may be engaged in the practice of law on behalf of clients. Because of the potential effects of this type of search on legitimate attorney-client relationships and because of the possibility that, during such a search, the government may encounter material protected by a legitimate claim of privilege, it is important that close control be exercised over this type of search. Therefore, the following guidelines should be followed with respect to such searches:

1. Alternatives to Search Warrants. In order to avoid impinging on valid attorney-client relationships, prosecutors are expected to take the least intrusive approach consistent with vigorous and effective law enforcement when evidence is sought from an attorney actively engaged in the practice of law. Consideration should be given to obtaining information from other sources or through the use of a subpoena, unless such efforts could compromise the criminal investigation or prosecution, or could result in the obstruction or destruction of evidence, or would otherwise be ineffective. NOTE: Prior approval must be obtained from the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division to issue a subpoena to an attorney relating to the representation of a client. See USAM 9-13.410.
2. Authorization by United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General. No application for such a search warrant may be made to a court without the express approval of the United States Attorney or pertinent Assistant Attorney General. Ordinarily, authorization of an application for such a search warrant is appropriate when there is a strong need for the information or material and less intrusive means have been considered and rejected.
3. Prior Consultation. In addition to obtaining approval from the United States Attorney or the pertinent Assistant Attorney General, and before seeking judicial authorization for the search warrant, the federal prosecutor must consult with the Criminal Division. NOTE: Attorneys are encouraged to consult with the Criminal Division as early as possible regarding a possible search of an attorney's office. Telephone No. (202) 305-4023; Fax No. (202) 305-0562.
   To facilitate the consultation, the prosecutor should submit the attached form (see Criminal Resource Manual at 265) containing relevant information about the proposed search along with a draft copy of the proposed search warrant, affidavit in support thereof, and any special instructions to the searching agents regarding search procedures and procedures to be followed to ensure that the prosecution team is not "tainted" by any privileged material inadvertently seized during the search. This information should be submitted to the Criminal Division through the Office of Enforcement Operations. This procedure does not preclude any United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General from discussing the matter personally with the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division.
   
   If exigent circumstances prevent such prior consultation, the Criminal Division should be notified of the search as promptly as possible. In all cases, the Criminal Division should be provided as promptly as possible with a copy of the judicially authorized search warrant, search warrant affidavit, and any special instructions to the searching agents.
   
   The Criminal Division is committed to ensuring that consultation regarding attorney search warrant requests will not delay investigations. Timely processing will be assisted if the Criminal Division is provided as much information about the search as early as possible. The Criminal Division should also be informed of any deadlines.
   
   
4. Safeguarding Procedures and Contents of the Affidavit. Procedures should be designed to ensure that privileged materials are not improperly viewed, seized or retained during the course of the search. While the procedures to be followed should be tailored to the facts of each case and the requirements and judicial preferences and precedents of each district, in all cases a prosecutor must employ adequate precautions to ensure that the materials are reviewed for privilege claims and that any privileged documents are returned to the attorney from whom they were seized.
5. Conducting the Search. The search warrant should be drawn as specifically as possible, consistent with the requirements of the investigation, to minimize the need to search and review privileged material to which no exception applies.
   While every effort should be made to avoid viewing privileged material, the search may require limited review of arguably privileged material to ascertain whether the material is covered by the warrant. Therefore, to protect the attorney-client privilege and to ensure that the investigation is not compromised by exposure to privileged material relating to the investigation or to defense strategy, a "privilege team" should be designated, consisting of agents and lawyers not involved in the underlying investigation.
   
   Instructions should be given and thoroughly discussed with the privilege team prior to the search. The instructions should set forth procedures designed to minimize the intrusion into privileged material, and should ensure that the privilege team does not disclose any information to the investigation/prosecution team unless and until so instructed by the attorney in charge of the privilege team. Privilege team lawyers should be available either on or off-site, to advise the agents during the course of the search, but should not participate in the search itself.
   
   The affidavit in support of the search warrant may attach any written instructions or, at a minimum, should generally state the government's intention to employ procedures designed to ensure that attorney-client privileges are not violated.
   
   If it is anticipated that computers will be searched or seized, prosecutors are expected to follow the procedures set forth in the current edition of Searching and Seizing Computers, published by CCIPS.
   
   
6. Review Procedures. The following review procedures should be discussed prior to approval of any warrant, consistent with the practice in your district, the circumstances of the investigation and the volume of materials seized.
   • Who will conduct the review, i.e., a privilege team, a judicial officer, or a special master.
   • Whether all documents will be submitted to a judicial officer or special master or only those which a privilege team has determined to be arguably privileged or arguably subject to an exception to the privilege.
   • Whether copies of all seized materials will be provided to the subject attorney (or a legal representative) in order that: a) disruption of the law firm's operation is minimized; and b) the subject is afforded an opportunity to participate in the process of submitting disputed documents to the court by raising specific claims of privilege. To the extent possible, providing copies of seized records is encouraged, where such disclosure will not impede or obstruct the investigation.
   • Whether appropriate arrangements have been made for storage and handling of electronic evidence and procedures developed for searching computer data (i.e., procedures which recognize the universal nature of computer seizure and are designed to avoid review of materials implicating the privilege of innocent clients).

These guidelines are set forth solely for the purpose of internal Department of Justice guidance. They are not intended to, do not, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter, civil or criminal, nor do they place any limitations on otherwise lawful investigative or litigative prerogatives of the Department of Justice.

See the Criminal Resource Manual at 265, for an attorney office search warrant form.

[updated October 2012] [cited in Criminal Resource Manual 265]

 

[bripat9643]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

 

[Valerie]

Donald Trump has it backwards on 'an attack on our country'


Justice Department followed the law in FBI raid on Michael Cohen.

 

[Valerie]

"The gloves are off. Trump is done playing nice with Mueller and Rosenstein. Major changes coming by Friday" - wacky jack posobiec

the evidence of team trump's crimes remain on the table, no matter who is in charge of the investigation.

if dumbo donny does fire rosenstein and remove mueller, that will be added to the obstruction of justice charges.

 

[bripat9643]

TRUMP is the one who is SHAMELESSLY attacking our country.

Trump again at war with 'deep state' Justice Department

Trump is cleaning the manure out of the stables.

 

[Valerie]

TRUMP is the one who is SHAMELESSLY attacking our country.

Trump again at war with 'deep state' Justice Department

Trump is cleaning the manure out of the stables.

men like comey and mueller have more integrity in their pinky fingers than donny ever had.

trump has no honor and clearly no clue as to what makes America great.

he's an embarrassment to our country.

 

[del]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

 

[bripat9643]

TRUMP is the one who is SHAMELESSLY attacking our country.

Trump again at war with 'deep state' Justice Department

Trump is cleaning the manure out of the stables.

men like comey and mueller have more integrity in their pinky fingers than donny ever had.

trump has no honor and clearly no clue as to what makes America great.

he's an embarrassment to our country.

They have no integrity whatsoever. Being a leftwing tool is not what integrity is.

 

[bripat9643]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

He selects judges that are already on the bench. Obama appointed the one who issued the FISA warrant.

 

[del]

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

He selects judges that are already on the bench. Obama appointed the one who issued the FISA warrant.

so roberts is in on it too, huh?

 

[bripat9643]

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

He selects judges that are already on the bench. Obama appointed the one who issued the FISA warrant.

so roberts is in on it too, huh?

Shit like that is why it's pointless to debate any issue with a moron like you. The bottom line is that Obama put that judge on the federal bench.

 

[del]

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

He selects judges that are already on the bench. Obama appointed the one who issued the FISA warrant.

so roberts is in on it too, huh?

Shit like that is why it's pointless to debate any issue with a moron like you. The bottom line is that Obama put that judge on the federal bench.

and roberts put him on fisa

roberts, not obama

so either roberts is in on the grand plot to get trump, or....what?

 

[Care4all]

if Trump used the charity donation from the Russian on Charity, then he has no problems.

If he did not use the charity donation from this foreigner on a charitable cause and used it to fund his campaign some how, then he is in trouble for breaking the law.....

simple as that.....

 

[bripat9643]

No, a U.S. attorney does not agree with it. He recused himself. The deputy attorney general is an establishment scumbag. Obama appointed the judge who approved it. He's the same judge that OK'd the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

roberts appoints fisa judges

you're correct about berman recusing himself, less correct as to his agreement

keep swinging

He selects judges that are already on the bench. Obama appointed the one who issued the FISA warrant.

so roberts is in on it too, huh?

Shit like that is why it's pointless to debate any issue with a moron like you. The bottom line is that Obama put that judge on the federal bench.

and roberts put him on fisa

roberts, not obama

so either roberts is in on the grand plot to get trump, or....what?

Obama wouldn't have appointed him if he wasn't a big lib. That's the bottom line.

Roberts probably didn't see a problem with putting a lib on the FISC. He mistakenly assumed they would have the same concern about violations of the 4th Amendment, but he was mistaken.

 

[harmonica]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

where is the solid evidence ?? and yet you are so SURE there is!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
I've got some crap and swampland to sell to you at a high price

go figure, huh??

 

[del]

where's the ACLU complaining about Trump's rights?

which of his rights have been infringed upon?

?????!!!!!!!!!!!
his lawyer being raided when there is no solid evidence---nothing even close to being evidence of criminality

strangely, a deputy attorney general, a us attorney and a federal magistrate, among others, disagree with your very astute position.

go figure, huh?

where is the solid evidence ?? and yet you are so SURE there is!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
I've got some crap and swampland to sell to you at a high price

go figure, huh??

i can see why you'd need the money

good luck