Mueller now has the inside scoop on the Comrade's Russia connection

The whole "Russian collusion" scam is overwrought nonsense.

Of course, you have no way of knowing the truth of that. You just wish it were so. It's like you're trying to convince yourself.

So far, we have no evidence to the contrary. Would you believe someone who was constantly shouting "Bigfoot!" but never produced a smidgeon of evidence that he exists?

"So far we have no evidence"

In what universe would a shmoe like you or me be privy to what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess? Your terrible logic: "if I havent been briefed on it, it does not exist"...that is laughable. And you are only embarrassing yourself like this because of partisanship.

If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence. I'm discussing facts. You're discussing a fantasy.

You keep claiming this evidence exists, yet you have never seen it. You're just like the guy shouting "bigfoot!"

"If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence"

You goofball...I didnt say I had that evidence...but you DID say that it didnt exist, simply because youndont know about it. That is absurd and makes you look dumb.

You just admitted you don't know about it, so how can you claim it exists?
 
Of course, you have no way of knowing the truth of that. You just wish it were so. It's like you're trying to convince yourself.

So far, we have no evidence to the contrary. Would you believe someone who was constantly shouting "Bigfoot!" but never produced a smidgeon of evidence that he exists?

"So far we have no evidence"

In what universe would a shmoe like you or me be privy to what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess? Your terrible logic: "if I havent been briefed on it, it does not exist"...that is laughable. And you are only embarrassing yourself like this because of partisanship.

If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence. I'm discussing facts. You're discussing a fantasy.

You keep claiming this evidence exists, yet you have never seen it. You're just like the guy shouting "bigfoot!"

"If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence"

You goofball...I didnt say I had that evidence...but you DID say that it didnt exist, simply because youndont know about it. That is absurd and makes you look dumb.

You just admitted you don't know about it, so how can you claim it exists?

Two indictments and a guilty plea. Mueller is making his way, with great detail, to the top. No one will know how many crimes have been committed until it is over.

That is what good Prosecutors do.
 
Of course, you have no way of knowing the truth of that. You just wish it were so. It's like you're trying to convince yourself.

So far, we have no evidence to the contrary. Would you believe someone who was constantly shouting "Bigfoot!" but never produced a smidgeon of evidence that he exists?

"So far we have no evidence"

In what universe would a shmoe like you or me be privy to what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess? Your terrible logic: "if I havent been briefed on it, it does not exist"...that is laughable. And you are only embarrassing yourself like this because of partisanship.

If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence. I'm discussing facts. You're discussing a fantasy.

You keep claiming this evidence exists, yet you have never seen it. You're just like the guy shouting "bigfoot!"

"If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence"

You goofball...I didnt say I had that evidence...but you DID say that it didnt exist, simply because youndont know about it. That is absurd and makes you look dumb.

You just admitted you don't know about it, so how can you claim it exists?

I didnt claim it exists...geesh man, this is like talking to a child.

I said you could not possibly know what evidence Mueller does or does not possess. I said this in response to your claim otherwise.
 
https://nypost.com/2017/11/23/flynn-lawyers-cut-ties-with-trump-legal-team-amid-investigation/

"Defense lawyers often share info during investigations but the practice is unethical when one client is cooperating with prosecutors and another is still being probed, the paper reported."

Let's npt forget the BIG Thanksgving news. Who will Mueller flip next?

Gawd, it's all over! Wheel Hillary into the White House already!

:lmao:
Who said this would make H. Clinton President?
 
"ONLY" seven months? LOL
The only thing he's come up with is an unrelated charge against Manafort, and that was only to squeeze him to get him to play ball and perjure himself. Same with Flynn.


Moron.........so, you "think" that Mueller is requesting these canaries to perjure themselves????

Is THAT your fucked up "conclusion?

In their defense, conspiracy is their only play.
Says the guy who thinks Russia stole the election for Donald Trump.

Says the guy who doesn't believe that happened at all. :cuckoo:

CIA: Director 'stands by' Russian interference assessment


"The CIA on Saturday said its director, Mike Pompeo, "stands by" the intelligence community's declassified report that concluded Russia ran an influence campaign aimed at helping President Trump win the White House in 2016."
 
Says the guy who doesn't believe that happened at all. :cuckoo:

CIA: Director 'stands by' Russian interference assessment


"The CIA on Saturday said its director, Mike Pompeo, "stands by" the intelligence community's declassified report that concluded Russia ran an influence campaign aimed at helping President Trump win the White House in 2016."
CIA director Pompeo could be just wanting to avoid a lot of work, reassessing the whole situation. Easier for him to just sit back, accept the OBAMA intelligence, and let it ride.. Ho hum.
 
So far, we have no evidence to the contrary. Would you believe someone who was constantly shouting "Bigfoot!" but never produced a smidgeon of evidence that he exists?

"So far we have no evidence"

In what universe would a shmoe like you or me be privy to what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess? Your terrible logic: "if I havent been briefed on it, it does not exist"...that is laughable. And you are only embarrassing yourself like this because of partisanship.

If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence. I'm discussing facts. You're discussing a fantasy.

You keep claiming this evidence exists, yet you have never seen it. You're just like the guy shouting "bigfoot!"

"If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence"

You goofball...I didnt say I had that evidence...but you DID say that it didnt exist, simply because youndont know about it. That is absurd and makes you look dumb.

You just admitted you don't know about it, so how can you claim it exists?

Two indictments and a guilty plea. Mueller is making his way, with great detail, to the top. No one will know how many crimes have been committed until it is over.

That is what good Prosecutors do.

You really believe that. :itsok:
Was it the Trump fund or the Clinton Fund and leeway that profited from selling our LAND, rich with rare resources, to the enemy?

Trump isn't the one that will ultimately be exposed. He had no need to destroy evidence with hammers. People hiding something do that. That was evidence going away before they were caught red handed.

If Trump had something to hide, he would have appointed someone favorable to him to investigate him, and when nothing was found, you would all scream that the fix was in. This way, the shadow government continues to fail to find anything CNN leak worthy for a year and a half. And every day they say, "maybe tomorrow is the day...".
It's not.
 
Says the guy who doesn't believe that happened at all. :cuckoo:

CIA: Director 'stands by' Russian interference assessment


"The CIA on Saturday said its director, Mike Pompeo, "stands by" the intelligence community's declassified report that concluded Russia ran an influence campaign aimed at helping President Trump win the White House in 2016."
CIA director Pompeo could be just wanting to avoid a lot of work, reassessing the whole situation. Easier for him to just sit back, accept the OBAMA intelligence, and let it ride.. Ho hum.

That's it alright. :wink_2:
 
Tell us some more about Mueller and the Muslim brotherhood, loser. :laugh:
You're the loser, ignorant one. I'm the one who has the information that you don't. What's the matter ? Your liberal OMISSION media didn't fill you in ?

Special counsel Robert Mueller, the Democrats pick for leading the witch hunt investigation against President Trump, is anything but virtuous. The former FBI Director has a sordid past, which if looked at objectively, would make any sane person question why he is in charge of anything. While Robert Mueller was the director of the FBI, he worked with various Islamic organizations to rid FBI training materials of all anti-terrorist verbiage deemed offensive by these Islamic organizations. The meeting that Robert Mueller had with these Islamic organizations was held in secret, and was only revealed after Judicial Watch sued for FBI records they believed revealed this meeting took place.

While meeting with organizations such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Robert Mueller gave into every demand these terrorist-connected organizations had, when it came to removing essential training materials which referenced terrorists and their radical Islamic beliefs. CAIR and ISNA were both named as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case. Both organizations have proven ties to various terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda and Hamas. Despite this, former FBI Director and now Special Counsel Robert Mueller thought it was appropriate to appease these terrorist organizations.

Judicial Watch reported on this back in May of 2017. “The records obtained as part of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit show that Mueller, who served 12 years as FBI chief, met with the Islamist organizations on February 8, 2012 to hear their demands. Shortly later the director assured the Muslim groups that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices nationwide. The purge was part of a broader Islamist operation designed to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at-large. The records obtained by Judicial Watch also show similar incidents of Islamic influence operations at the Departments of Justice and State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Obama White House.”

The motive Robert Mueller gave for his placating to terrorist organizations was that some of the material was highly offensive and incorrectly described the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. However, at one point in time, Robert Mueller himself asserted that the Muslim Brotherhood did, in fact, support terrorism, and conspired with organizations intent on killing Americans, and anyone they deemed to be an infidel. Material which was deemed to be offensive to these terrorists included, “An article claiming Al Qaeda is ‘clearly linked’ to the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing; The Qur’an is not the teachings of the Prophet, but the revealed word of God; sweeping generality of ‘Those who fit the terrorist profile best (for the present at least) are young male immigrants of Middle Eastern appearance;’ conflating Islamic Militancy with terrorism. The list goes on and on.” The removal of this material also affected various local police departments as they use FBI training materials to train their officers to combat terrorists. Compounding this issue, CAIR, for example, was allowed to dictate to local police departments what terrorist training material was offensive. They got away with this nonsense because they had the blessing of the FBI and its Director Robert Mueller. Thus a very dangerous situation was created where the fox was allowed into the hen house and had free reign to dictate FBI training material policy when it came to fighting terrorists.

Mueller has repeatedly been befriended by Muslim Brotherhood front groups and been in attendance at their functions, such as when he was a keynote speaker at an MPAC conference, as well as at INSA's national convention. Might as well have been at ISIS leaders al Baghdadi's birthday party.

Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013 documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief.

As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands. The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism. Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case. CAIR is a terrorist front group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists. It was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic Association for Palestine.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Mueller has been consorting with seditious Muslim Brotherhood front groups for years.
 
So far, we have no evidence to the contrary. Would you believe someone who was constantly shouting "Bigfoot!" but never produced a smidgeon of evidence that he exists?

"So far we have no evidence"

In what universe would a shmoe like you or me be privy to what evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess? Your terrible logic: "if I havent been briefed on it, it does not exist"...that is laughable. And you are only embarrassing yourself like this because of partisanship.

If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence. I'm discussing facts. You're discussing a fantasy.

You keep claiming this evidence exists, yet you have never seen it. You're just like the guy shouting "bigfoot!"

"If you aren't aware of any evidence, that means you have no evidence"

You goofball...I didnt say I had that evidence...but you DID say that it didnt exist, simply because youndont know about it. That is absurd and makes you look dumb.

You just admitted you don't know about it, so how can you claim it exists?

Two indictments and a guilty plea. Mueller is making his way, with great detail, to the top. No one will know how many crimes have been committed until it is over.

That is what good Prosecutors do.
mueller-time.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top