toxicmedia
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2011
- 5,569
- 876
Ummmm...maybe because they are trying to exercize their religious beliefs?so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...
The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.
why aren't you protesting them?
incidentally, none of those are illegal.
Does Judge Judy have also have a 1200 year record of employing mass-murder as a means to acquire political power? I wasn't aware?
(Reader Judge Judy considers civil matters to which the parties sign contracts within the scope of the program... Judge Judy does not have any authority over the individuals and she cannot use law enforcement to enforce her rulings. Where the individuals fail to adhere to her ruling, the prevailing parties would need to seek judgement from a duly appointed court to enforce such.
By seeking sanction from the City of Irvine, the Muslims were seeking to increase their perceived authority... a first step to becoming recognized as an ACTUAL "AUTHORITY".)
Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?
The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?