Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops “Sharia Court”

But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?
I was asking about Irving Texas

Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
 
But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?
Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
I was asking about Irving Texas.

What did this judge need to stop?

The potential for it? or actual things that happened?
 
Why is the mayor and a city council getting involved with the inner workings of a religious institution? Shouldn't it be the Attorney General and law enforcement to handle any situations that run foul of the local and state laws? Why would we want or allow a chief executive and or legislature to supervise how a religion practices their religion? That town is going to be buying real estate and building a big beautiful mosque for the folks they are depriving of their constitutional rights to worship as they please.
Its close to election time. Whoever fools the most bigoted inbreds in Texas gets the most votes.
 
But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?
Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
I was asking about Irving Texas.

What did this judge need to stop?

The potential for it? or actual things that happened?
They had to stop the Mooslims from enacting Sharia law in Texas. Its all the rage you know.
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.
again, why do you think they went to the city? maybe for a business license but that'd be all
 
But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?
Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
I was asking about Irving Texas.

What did this judge need to stop?

The potential for it? or actual things that happened?
They had to stop the Mooslims from enacting Sharia law in Texas. Its all the rage you know.
It sounds like nothing bad was happening...and the Texans thought if they didn't put a stop to it, horrible things would happen
 
But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?
Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
I was asking about Irving Texas.

What did this judge need to stop?

The potential for it? or actual things that happened?
They had to stop the Mooslims from enacting Sharia law in Texas. Its all the rage you know.
It sounds like nothing bad was happening...and the Texans thought if they didn't put a stop to it, horrible things would happen
Not only was nothing bad happening, the only problem the muslims had with the law was that the mayor basically heightened tensions with her islamaphobic rants. Otherwise the law had no effect on what they are doing. Matter of fact the law doesnt even mention religion.
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

For the upteenth time, let's try to stick to reality. What civil penalties are they seeking to impose - surely you can come up with an informational link with out a brain spasm?

Don't be thick. They're seeking the right to impose whatever penalties they deem fit and as part of their strategy, they're omitting specifics. We don't have to give you the specifics they choose not to disclose, nor can we. But you're not the only one asking that question which is why Texas saw fit to pass the law banning the practice.
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

For the upteenth time, let's try to stick to reality. What civil penalties are they seeking to impose - surely you can come up with an informational link with out a brain spasm?

Don't be thick. They're seeking the right to impose whatever penalties they deem fit and as part of their strategy, they're omitting specifics. We don't have to give you the specifics they choose not to disclose, nor can we. But you're not the only one asking that question which is why Texas saw fit to pass the law banning the practice.
Sounds like Texas was afraid of what they might do
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

For the upteenth time, let's try to stick to reality. What civil penalties are they seeking to impose - surely you can come up with an informational link with out a brain spasm?

Don't be thick. They're seeking the right to impose whatever penalties they deem fit and as part of their strategy, they're omitting specifics. We don't have to give you the specifics they choose not to disclose, nor can we. But you're not the only one asking that question which is why Texas saw fit to pass the law banning the practice.
Sounds like Texas was afraid of what they might do

Nothing screams "small government" than making laws based on fears of boogeymen.
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

For the upteenth time, let's try to stick to reality. What civil penalties are they seeking to impose - surely you can come up with an informational link with out a brain spasm?

Don't be thick. They're seeking the right to impose whatever penalties they deem fit and as part of their strategy, they're omitting specifics. We don't have to give you the specifics they choose not to disclose, nor can we. But you're not the only one asking that question which is why Texas saw fit to pass the law banning the practice.
Except nothing the inbreds in Texas passed effected what they do.
 
What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.
Nothing in the OP says they went to the city for anything

It is the city going after them
 
But it doesn't sound like anyone is being forced to adhere to the religious law in question.

That's the only problem.

Are beheadings and sexual mutilations going on?...or things happening that are against Texas state law?

Of course there are.

Anywhere their are Muslims, there will be genital mutilation.

{More than half a million women and girls in the U.S. are at risk of undergoing FGM in the U.S. or abroad, or have already undergone the procedure, including 166,173 under the age of 18, according to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB).}

http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-rates-have-doubled-us-2004-304773
Don't forget ISIS and flying planes into the twin towers

You know how them Mooslims are
 

Forum List

Back
Top