Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Democrat that challenges Hillary?Not if the economy turns around!!!
If we get a repeat of the late 90s, robust economy, federal surplus, abundance of jobs and no wars
We are going to keep her! I
Perhaps.......but a less tainted democrat who would continue successful economic policies could emerge from the large segments of minority politicians within the democrat party...Keep a close eye on Warren in 2020.
You must think the corporations have no say!!Until recently (when Gingrich became Speaker of the House) Congress did its job, compromised and we got buy with the camel instead of the horse we needed. Compromise has given way to ideology and brinkmanship, leading to a contrived impeachment of President Clinton and gridlock during the past 7+ years. It 's time to admit the McConnel-Boehner/Ryan experiment is a failure and The Congress needs new leadership or we can expect four more years of malaise.
Of course, you're correct on most of the above......Whichever party wants to be credible, must yield to some form of compromise and lets cut out the mistakes we've made on our economy...we must admit that:
- Trickle-down does not work;
- Banks are too damn big and powerful
- Trade agreements cannot be made by greedy business enterprises
- Our health system sucks while being ridiculously expensive
- Our infrastructure CAN be fixed
- ....and we can make our economy THRIVE if we stop listening to oil/coal barons and embrace the reality of global warming and address the alternative energy options.
A Democrat that challenges Hillary?
We already know who they are!! And Sanders quit the party!!
Every thing you want is anti business!Tell us, you talk of compromise. What does the business sector gets in return? What! They kiss your butt!!
You're becoming unhinged...Slow down and state your case a bit more coherently.
Like George H W Bush and Jimmy Carter?
More like
FDR
Truman
Ike
Kennedy/Johnson
Nixon
Reagan
Clinton
Bush II
Obama
If animal hater and beagle abuser Johnson had not engineered the events on the grassy knolls on November 23rd, 1963, there would not have ever been a "Kennedy/Johnson" situation, There would have never been a loss of 58,000 of American lives in Viet Nam, there would have never been "those ni66ers will vote Democrat for the next 200 years", and there would not be a Democrat admiration of Hillary Clinton as there was an undeserved admiration of the ultimate racist, Lyndon Baines Johnson. The Democratic Party would have remained a party of political competition, not a party of personal destruction, of hate and envy and deceitful corruption.
What happened on the 23rd?
The fact that I made a mistake on the key board and punched 23rd instead of the 22nd gives comfort only to idiots like you.
The animal abuser racist assassination planner remains the same.
Oh; okay.
Trump supporter…am I right?
Republicans will get pounded in the 2016 election
The reasons will be running an unelectable candidate, alienating Hispanics and other minorities and losing the women's vote by historic proportions
They will analyze what happened and blame the media, claim Trump was not conservative enough and that Hillary cheated
They will run Cruz in 2020...Rinse/Repeat
Republicans will get pounded in the 2016 election
The reasons will be running an unelectable candidate, alienating Hispanics and other minorities and losing the women's vote by historic proportions
They will analyze what happened and blame the media, claim Trump was not conservative enough and that Hillary cheated
They will run Cruz in 2020...Rinse/Repeat
Excellent analogy, Mr. Rightwinger. Whoever is elected, and I shudder with chills even in this 100 degree heat, will only serve one term.
More like
FDR
Truman
Ike
Kennedy/Johnson
Nixon
Reagan
Clinton
Bush II
Obama
If animal hater and beagle abuser Johnson had not engineered the events on the grassy knolls on November 23rd, 1963, there would not have ever been a "Kennedy/Johnson" situation, There would have never been a loss of 58,000 of American lives in Viet Nam, there would have never been "those ni66ers will vote Democrat for the next 200 years", and there would not be a Democrat admiration of Hillary Clinton as there was an undeserved admiration of the ultimate racist, Lyndon Baines Johnson. The Democratic Party would have remained a party of political competition, not a party of personal destruction, of hate and envy and deceitful corruption.
What happened on the 23rd?
The fact that I made a mistake on the key board and punched 23rd instead of the 22nd gives comfort only to idiots like you.
The animal abuser racist assassination planner remains the same.
Oh; okay.
Trump supporter…am I right?
You are wrong. As usual.
Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.Mixed feelings on your retort, my friend.....As a democrat, but FIRST as a loyal and caring American, I certainly hope that a reasonable alternative will arise for the DNC in 2020, and that Clinton will have enough integrity left in her system to call it quits after 4 years in the oval office.
Unless they are driven from office like LBJ, a sitting president never passes up a shot at a second term
All the factors that make Hillary unbeatable in 2016 will still be there in 2020....Women's vote, Hispanic vote, a batshit crazy Republican base
LBJ had only himself to blame for his troubles.
LBJ listened to his advisors on Vietnam ....I think JFK would have done the same thing
nonsense.
And, since we are talking about predictions, I predict that regardless of the results on election night, Hillary will functionally keel over regardless of the results.
Every thing you want is anti business!Tell us, you talk of compromise. What does the business sector gets in return? What! They kiss your butt!!
You're becoming unhinged...Slow down and state your case a bit more coherently.
Trickle down is tax breaks and subsidy for corps
The few Banks are in control of a small, easy to manipulate market.
I have to go, bb in 30 min
And, since we are talking about predictions, I predict that regardless of the results on election night, Hillary will functionally keel over regardless of the results.
Give it a rest, FJO....Like Trump, you're a "legend" in your own half brain.
It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.Unless they are driven from office like LBJ, a sitting president never passes up a shot at a second term
All the factors that make Hillary unbeatable in 2016 will still be there in 2020....Women's vote, Hispanic vote, a batshit crazy Republican base
LBJ had only himself to blame for his troubles.
LBJ listened to his advisors on Vietnam ....I think JFK would have done the same thing
nonsense.
That's a baseless assumption on your part
This November we will elect perhaps the most tainted politician to the WH in modern times, Hillary Clinton...sending to the dumpster the only worst candidate than she.....Trumpster.
However, Clinton's term will be so ridden with past corruption allegations that Hillary will only serve a one-term and in 2020 both sides of the aisle will have learned a lesson and propose 2 much more serious and less flawed candidates.
Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.
It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.LBJ had only himself to blame for his troubles.
LBJ listened to his advisors on Vietnam ....I think JFK would have done the same thing
nonsense.
That's a baseless assumption on your part
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
And, since we are talking about predictions, I predict that regardless of the results on election night, Hillary will functionally keel over regardless of the results.
Give it a rest, FJO....Like Trump, you're a "legend" in your own half brain.
Thank you. In fact, JFK increased troop strength to over 13,000 in SV, approved the creation of the green beanies so that a new type of counter insurgency tool could be employed in SV, and only fool tools think JFK was wacked over BoP and SV. You are certifiable.Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.LBJ listened to his advisors on Vietnam ....I think JFK would have done the same thing
nonsense.
That's a baseless assumption on your part
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
