Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vietnam in 1963 was not the same as Vietnam in 1966Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.LBJ listened to his advisors on Vietnam ....I think JFK would have done the same thing
nonsense.
That's a baseless assumption on your part
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
The obvious is that you are obviously wrong. JFK was a Cold War Warrior, and only the foolish refuse to acknowledge that.Thank you. In fact, JFK increased troop strength to over 13,000 in SV, approved the creation of the green beanies so that a new type of counter insurgency tool could be employed in SV, and only fool tools think JFK was wacked over BoP and SV. You are certifiable.Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.Nope, JFK listened to his advisers, as did LBJ. The dem would have grown the war.
That's a baseless assumption on your part
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
You're to stupid to see the obvious.
The obvious is that you are obviously wrong. JFK was a Cold War Warrior, and only the foolish refuse to acknowledge that.Thank you. In fact, JFK increased troop strength to over 13,000 in SV, approved the creation of the green beanies so that a new type of counter insurgency tool could be employed in SV, and only fool tools think JFK was wacked over BoP and SV. You are certifiable.Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.That's a baseless assumption on your part
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
You're to stupid to see the obvious.
In his three years of being president, he increased troop strengths almost twenty fold, PW. That is not slow walking.The obvious is that you are obviously wrong. JFK was a Cold War Warrior, and only the foolish refuse to acknowledge that.Thank you. In fact, JFK increased troop strength to over 13,000 in SV, approved the creation of the green beanies so that a new type of counter insurgency tool could be employed in SV, and only fool tools think JFK was wacked over BoP and SV. You are certifiable.Yep. JFK had increased troop strength by almost 20 fold and gave no indication he was going to get out. Anyone who says he was is the same type of scholar who says no veterans were spit on. Such people as those are confirmation bias homers, nothing more.It's a conclusive point based on all the evidence.
Your assumption is baseless is the point, pw.
You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
You're to stupid to see the obvious.
I never said he wouldn't start the war. Only that he slow walked the start of the war.
This November we will elect perhaps the most tainted politician to the WH in modern times, Hillary Clinton...sending to the dumpster the only worst candidate than she.....Trumpster.
However, Clinton's term will be so ridden with past corruption allegations that Hillary will only serve a one-term and in 2020 both sides of the aisle will have learned a lesson and propose 2 much more serious and less flawed candidates.
Either or is better than neither nor and we end up with Shrill or Red Donald.Johnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
Johnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
They will do well with 7% of the voteJohnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
They've already agreed to operate as a unified team. A two for one. Lord knows there is monumental work to do to separate the 2 warring parties..
I doubt they will get 5%They may get to twice that, RW.
and yet she dominated the rest of the hopefuls to the point the only two I can name are bernie and that guy that got booed for saying 'all lives matter', yaknow, whathisnamebut I disagree that she's only getting 1 term. The medias ability to lie and the deep need of the left to be first in history will do everything to ensure she gets a second term. And you and every other leftist will support her, blaming everything she does wrong on the fact that the right didn't let her fuck it up harder.
I disagree.......Clinton's MAIN support from us on the left boils down to just ONE factor......Trump !!!
(and I believe that Clinton is smart enough to know that her current support is at best tenuous.)
They will do well with 7% of the voteJohnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
They've already agreed to operate as a unified team. A two for one. Lord knows there is monumental work to do to separate the 2 warring parties..
.
In this case, I think you are very wrong.I doubt they will get 5%They may get to twice that, RW.
People like to talk about voting third party and then bail once they get in the booth
What would make you think all that would go away if a third party was elected?They will do well with 7% of the voteJohnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
They've already agreed to operate as a unified team. A two for one. Lord knows there is monumental work to do to separate the 2 warring parties..
.
I'm more concerned with the DISASTER that EITHER of your candidates will bring to this country. .You think one side GIVES UP after Nov 9th? It's gonna be dysfunction city and increased poo flinging for those 4 years. If you can't SEE that and you're cheering that on --- You are part of the problem.
Polls don't matter. Even the election RETURNS don't matter. What MATTERS is the LParty has been CORRECT on almost EVERY issue for the past 30 years. We've CONSISTENTLY been 20 yrs ahead of polls.. America eventually catches up with us. Although NOW --- if they don't wise up -- the time is getting very short.
What would make you think all that would go away if a third party was elected?They will do well with 7% of the voteJohnson/Weld is the right choice.
Weld/Johnson would be a bit better choice.
They've already agreed to operate as a unified team. A two for one. Lord knows there is monumental work to do to separate the 2 warring parties..
.
I'm more concerned with the DISASTER that EITHER of your candidates will bring to this country. .You think one side GIVES UP after Nov 9th? It's gonna be dysfunction city and increased poo flinging for those 4 years. If you can't SEE that and you're cheering that on --- You are part of the problem.
Polls don't matter. Even the election RETURNS don't matter. What MATTERS is the LParty has been CORRECT on almost EVERY issue for the past 30 years. We've CONSISTENTLY been 20 yrs ahead of polls.. America eventually catches up with us. Although NOW --- if they don't wise up -- the time is getting very short.
In his three years of being president, he increased troop strengths almost twenty fold, PW. That is not slow walking.The obvious is that you are obviously wrong. JFK was a Cold War Warrior, and only the foolish refuse to acknowledge that.Thank you. In fact, JFK increased troop strength to over 13,000 in SV, approved the creation of the green beanies so that a new type of counter insurgency tool could be employed in SV, and only fool tools think JFK was wacked over BoP and SV. You are certifiable.You're full of shit.
The man is dead and up until his death while president did everything he could to slow walk the start of the Vietnam war. I believe JFK's assination was the result of his refusal to allow the airforce to provide air support for the disastrous bay of pigs invasion and slow walking the start of the Vietnam war.
You're to stupid to see the obvious.
I never said he wouldn't start the war. Only that he slow walked the start of the war.
