Based on a YouTube Video alone?That's the end of the AGW Scam
Do you work at the State Department now Frank?
He works the streets several blocks south of the State Dept. The street corners, actually.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on a YouTube Video alone?That's the end of the AGW Scam
Do you work at the State Department now Frank?
Based on a YouTube Video alone?That's the end of the AGW Scam
Do you work at the State Department now Frank?
He works the streets several blocks south of the State Dept. The street corners, actually.
That's the end of the AGW Scam
The AGWCult said this experiment validated their theory.That's the end of the AGW Scam
That's the end of it? No more discussion?
Hmm ... a bit premature, don't you think?
The AGWCult said this experiment validated their theory.That's the end of the AGW Scam
That's the end of it? No more discussion?
Hmm ... a bit premature, don't you think?
It doesn't
AGW= Fail
No actual argument? Juvenile insult the best you can do? Really? Maybe you should go back to the sandbox....grown ups are talking here.
Interesting that you align yourself with people who have publicly stated that they wan't to kill, in mass, people who don't agree with them. Does that mesh with your way of thinking also?
The AGWCult said this experiment validated their theory.That's the end of it? No more discussion?
Hmm ... a bit premature, don't you think?
It doesn't
AGW= Fail
I don't really think it validates anything.
... But, It certainly does not eliminate it, either.
The AGWCult said this experiment validated their theory.
It doesn't
AGW= Fail
I don't really think it validates anything.
... But, It certainly does not eliminate it, either.
But the 17 year pause in warming while the level of CO2 in the atmosphere has skyrocketed certainly does. No computer model (and that is all that CAGW "theory" is based on) predicted that. That means the GCM's are useless and that means the whole "theory" is useless.
No actual argument? Juvenile insult the best you can do? Really? Maybe you should go back to the sandbox....grown ups are talking here.
Interesting that you align yourself with people who have publicly stated that they wan't to kill, in mass, people who don't agree with them. Does that mesh with your way of thinking also?
Poor SSDD now fantasizes about genocide 24/7. It goes along with the Stalinist way of thinking that he's always exhibited here.
SSDD, there is an easy way for you to demonstrate you're not a Stalinist. Start small. State that the Republican party was morally wrong for trying to jail Dr. Mann. Can you do that, or are you incapable of renouncing Stalinst tactics?
I don't really think it validates anything.
... But, It certainly does not eliminate it, either.
But the 17 year pause in warming while the level of CO2 in the atmosphere has skyrocketed certainly does. No computer model (and that is all that CAGW "theory" is based on) predicted that. That means the GCM's are useless and that means the whole "theory" is useless.
Meaning it isn't a theory. Instead a hypothesis that still hasn't been proven.
No actual argument? Juvenile insult the best you can do? Really? Maybe you should go back to the sandbox....grown ups are talking here.
Interesting that you align yourself with people who have publicly stated that they wan't to kill, in mass, people who don't agree with them. Does that mesh with your way of thinking also?
Poor SSDD now fantasizes about genocide 24/7. It goes along with the Stalinist way of thinking that he's always exhibited here.
SSDD, there is an easy way for you to demonstrate you're not a Stalinist. Start small. State that the Republican party was morally wrong for trying to jail Dr. Mann. Can you do that, or are you incapable of renouncing Stalinst tactics?
Hey........OFF TOPIC. WE DON'T NEED THIS CRAP HERE.
No actual argument? Juvenile insult the best you can do? Really? Maybe you should go back to the sandbox....grown ups are talking here.
Interesting that you align yourself with people who have publicly stated that they wan't to kill, in mass, people who don't agree with them. Does that mesh with your way of thinking also?
Poor SSDD now fantasizes about genocide 24/7. It goes along with the Stalinist way of thinking that he's always exhibited here.
SSDD, there is an easy way for you to demonstrate you're not a Stalinist. Start small. State that the Republican party was morally wrong for trying to jail Dr. Mann. Can you do that, or are you incapable of renouncing Stalinst tactics?
Was mann paid via tax money? If he was, then the public is entitled to see his data.
I don't really think it validates anything.
... But, It certainly does not eliminate it, either.
But the 17 year pause in warming while the level of CO2 in the atmosphere has skyrocketed certainly does. No computer model (and that is all that CAGW "theory" is based on) predicted that. That means the GCM's are useless and that means the whole "theory" is useless.
Meaning it isn't a theory. Instead a hypothesis that still hasn't been proven.
Was mann paid via tax money? If he was, then the public is entitled to see his data.
So the Stalinism is so deeply ingrained in you, you can't even bring yourself to condemn an obvious Stalinist persecution of scientist for doing science that offended TheParty.
And if you're for that type of Stalinism, you're probably for all of it. Once you've tossed aside all decency and ethics, as you've done there, there's no limits to your further depravity.
Oh, stop hitting on me that way. I'm a dude, and it creeps me out.
Was mann paid via tax money? If he was, then the public is entitled to see his data.
So the Stalinism is so deeply ingrained in you, you can't even bring yourself to condemn an obvious Stalinist persecution of scientist for doing science that offended TheParty.
And if you're for that type of Stalinism, you're probably for all of it. Once you've tossed aside all decency and ethics, as you've done there, there's no limits to your further depravity.
Oh, stop hitting on me that way. I'm a dude, and it creeps me out.
They were very cryptic about how much CO2 was in the tanks. When you go to 1:37 in the video the do a fast pan over the equipment and in shows CO2 at 7.34% which is 73,400 PPM.Explain it please. I can't access the you tube. Did MB intentionally skew data to show a increase in CO2 that didn't happen?