You know that all donations to political campaigns are publicly available information, right?
This isn't about transparency, it's about selling ads during the State of the Union.
That depends no who gets mentioned. If it is all corporate donors then you will be correct. If it is small mom and pop donators, then you will be wrong.
It's still paid advertising, either way - whether it's a corporation seeking recognition, or a "mom and pop" looking to see their name on TV.
A corporation benefits from their advertising. A mom an pop being recognized for their donation, don't. That's a big difference. The mom and pop will get nothing, but the corporation hopes to generate business from it.
I understand the difference, it's just not relevant to the point I'm trying to make.
Really? How so? One gets financial benefit from it, the other doesn't. How is that not different?
Because it's still just as tacky, either way.