BuckToothMoron
Gold Member
- Apr 3, 2016
- 9,895
- 1,898
- 290
Humans dont have the ability to prove everything which is where your argument fails. There is no one to correct them being wrong as science has proven to be on countless occasions. There is proof there is a creator. I already cited the existence of fractals as proof.Only a student of futility would endeavor to pursue proof of nonexistence. Science focuses on the understanding of what can be proven to exist. And as for a "creator", no evidence, or proof exists...No the implication is that evolution started life. The story goes something like this. One day evolution talked some dirt into becoming alive and replicating itself. Evolution continued to coax this life into changing to adapt to an environment so it would stay alive.No credible student of science has ever stated tha evolution started life. It's nosensicle at just a casual glance. No life= no evolution. You alone make this claim. And I agree that it is absurd.Yet you cant produce one fact that proves evolution started life. You can only show proof of evolution existing as a process dependent on the existence of life.It matters because these same people bring this same ignorance to the table when deciding on how to vote, and therefore all the laws that everyone must live by. It gives a dangerous amount of power to ignorance, and it's easily avoided. If their nonsensical beliefs remained within their own bubble, I'd have no problem with it. But the facts are that said ignorance does not remain I isolated to the viewholder.
Until you can point to where life spontaneously generates itself you have no proof there is not a master engineer.
Sorry, I missed your "factual" proof of a creator. Will you please repost or direct me to your post where it exist. I also never claimed that humans do have the ability to prove everything, so I'm not sure why you are employing that straw man argument.
It seems apparent we have exhausted this line of discussion. This is the typical conclusion when debating or discussing this topic with a theologically based thinker such as yourself rather than a scientifically based thinker. They run dry on substance and resort to,philosophy.