Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,519
- 1,895
Haven't conservatives been reprimanding Obama for spending too much for the past year? Shouldn't they be supporting this decision? Even though, as I said, he's not going to cut anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm. *gesturing as if a balance is in my hands* Paying for 'universal' health care or paying for the advancement of science. The latter weighs heavily to me, but I'm not a Democrat.Yeah, how dare we try to save some money by cutting things we don't need. Not that we're really going to cut any funding to NASA.
The false choice again, trotted out everytime space is discussed.Hmmm. *gesturing as if a balance is in my hands* Paying for 'universal' health care or paying for the advancement of science. The latter weighs heavily to me, but I'm not a Democrat.Yeah, how dare we try to save some money by cutting things we don't need. Not that we're really going to cut any funding to NASA.
So you would rather pay to send a shuttle to a planet, that we really don't NEED to go to, than help out your fellow man?
Wow, that is awesome.
Hey Neil..
The US hasn't been to the moon in almost 40 years. Did you suddenly wake up and decide to trash the direction of our space program?
Yea and and their all Racists too!!! The Hopey Changey nutters can spin all they want. This President has been a real disaster for NASA. It's actually very sad.
After we rebuild the infrastructure of the US - this would include roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, transportation systems, electric grid, develop better energy alternatives, bike lanes and trains, then we can resume flying around in circles.
"Western society has accepted as unquestionable a technological imperative that is quite as arbitrary as the most primitive taboo: not merely the duty to foster invention and constantly to create technological novelties, but equally the duty to surrender to these novelties unconditionally, just because they are offered, without respect to their human consequences." Lewis Mumford
Link, please. Thanks in advance.Hey Neil..
The US hasn't been to the moon in almost 40 years. Did you suddenly wake up and decide to trash the direction of our space program?
Why yes, yes he did. Neil has some very lucrative private contracts with NASA that he is probably going to lose now. In his shoes, I would probably be a little upset too.
He tried that shit with Buzz Aldrin, and we all saw what happened:Link, please. Thanks in advance.Hey Neil..
The US hasn't been to the moon in almost 40 years. Did you suddenly wake up and decide to trash the direction of our space program?
Why yes, yes he did. Neil has some very lucrative private contracts with NASA that he is probably going to lose now. In his shoes, I would probably be a little upset too.
Yea and and their all Racists too!!! The Hopey Changey nutters can spin all they want. This President has been a real disaster for NASA. It's actually very sad.
How is this a disaster for NASA? Obama is actually increasing their budget?
As I have already stated here, I am all for government spending on science, so some may say I have a bias. I do, but I justify it constitutionally based on Vannevar Bush's excellent report to Roosevelt about the importance of science funding to our nation's security.Everybody loves their own subsidy.
Sell off NASA to the private sector. American companies only need apply. Set subsidies up as "prizes" like
Return to Moon Prize
Lunar Shuttle Service Prize
Manned Mission to Mars Prize
Manned Mission to Venus Prize.
L5 Private Manned Orbital Habitat Prize.
You do payouts for those goals and you will see some interesting stuff happen in this nation.
But end the government stranglehold.
Yea and and their all Racists too!!! The Hopey Changey nutters can spin all they want. This President has been a real disaster for NASA. It's actually very sad.
How is this a disaster for NASA? Obama is actually increasing their budget?
Increasing Nasa's budget by 6 billion over five years is nothing. That is the equivalent of building 3 B-2 Steath Bombers which cost 2.1 billion to build.
See shiteater?How is this a disaster for NASA? Obama is actually increasing their budget?
Increasing Nasa's budget by 6 billion over five years is nothing. That is the equivalent of building 3 B-2 Steath Bombers which cost 2.1 billion to build.
I thought you Tea baggers WANTED our government to cut spending? Now, you a Tea Bagger are suddenly not worried about reigning in costs?????????
I'm not a teabagger as I can't do that, but as a Tea Partier, we are not for all government cuts, we ARE for responsible cuts. Cutting NASA programs is not responsible for the reasons I have outlined.How is this a disaster for NASA? Obama is actually increasing their budget?
Increasing Nasa's budget by 6 billion over five years is nothing. That is the equivalent of building 3 B-2 Steath Bombers which cost 2.1 billion to build.
I thought you Tea baggers WANTED our government to cut spending? Now, you a Tea Bagger are suddenly not worried about reigning in costs?????????