Crick
Gold Member
- May 10, 2014
- 29,679
- 5,773
- Thread starter
- #181
Is it your claim is that WG-I's "The Physical Science Basis" contains no empirical data supporting anthropgenic causation of global warming?You know that statement to be a lie.He says it is very difficult to measure actual human influence and that the research and the debate need to carry on.
Then he canned the entire climate research department and explained to his interviewer why the EPA itself should be disbanded.
"Giving pink slips to scientists across the federal government, including 43% of EPA scientists, and proposing to eliminate the US Climate Global Research Program in its entirety makes one question who this administration will rely on for scientific research and facts." --Gina McCarthy, former EPA head
"Pruitt loves baseball so put it this way: An EPA head denying science is like [Derek] Jeter refusing to use a bat. He'd be fired and so should Pruitt," -- Michael Brune, Executive Head of the Sierra Club.
What an admirable bunch are American conservatives under the leadership of an ignorant, mentally unstable fool like Donald Trump. Exceptionally so. Eh?
He's correct. To date there is ZERO empirical evidence to support the theory. Just screaming "CONSENSUS" doesn't make it so...
Sent from my VS985 4G using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
No. I KNOW that statement to be factually correct.
Sent from my VS985 4G using USMessageBoard.com mobile app