Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Btw, this nonsense is only coming from conservative Americans. This isn't a discussion Europeans came up with. Sharia law is rarely used in European courts for divorce cases. That's completely normal and within standards of European law. So I suggest you people shut up.
Oh wow, copy paste, you sure proved it......
You first had a problem with the source I used. Now you have a problem that I quoted a source at all.
The burden is upon you to disprove it, however, you have failed at that as well.
Your source is hate site. Just to look at a few articles they have, and all they do is mention israel.
Btw, this nonsense is only coming from conservative Americans. This isn't a discussion Europeans came up with. Sharia law is rarely used in European courts for divorce cases. That's completely normal and within standards of European law. So I suggest you people shut up.
Of course the Europeans came up the discussion....In fact, the European Court of Human Rights, "considered that sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it". According to the Court, it was difficult to declare ones respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia...particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."
http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyre..._Cancado_Trindade_BIL__opening_legal_year.pdf
You first had a problem with the source I used. Now you have a problem that I quoted a source at all.
The burden is upon you to disprove it, however, you have failed at that as well.
Your source is hate site. Just to look at a few articles they have, and all they do is mention israel.
Rebut the information, BIK, otherwise you fail.
Btw, this nonsense is only coming from conservative Americans. This isn't a discussion Europeans came up with. Sharia law is rarely used in European courts for divorce cases. That's completely normal and within standards of European law. So I suggest you people shut up.
Of course the Europeans came up the discussion....In fact, the European Court of Human Rights, "considered that sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it". According to the Court, it was difficult to declare ones respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia...particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."
http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyre..._Cancado_Trindade_BIL__opening_legal_year.pdf
Several aspects are only used in courts. And??
Of course the Europeans came up the discussion....In fact, the European Court of Human Rights, "considered that sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it". According to the Court, it was difficult to declare ones respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia...particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."
http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyre..._Cancado_Trindade_BIL__opening_legal_year.pdf
Several aspects are only used in courts. And??
You did not read the materials correctly...."it was difficult to declare ones respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia...particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."
The spread of Islam must be stopped. Hopefully someday the West will wake up and kick these third world barbarians out.
Connery leave your hogwash out and tell me what this is really about for you? You're not going anywhere with this, you're simply just rambling about Islamic law that is legal in European courts just as Judaic law can be used in courts as well. Big deal hater. It's really funny to see you people hide behind this little thing to give yourself an opportunity to demonize Islam. It's not like we don't know you hate Muslims. Ha Ha Ha! And then you're gonna tell us we should be thankful that you only criticized Islam and not the people in general. You people are something else. Quit trying to create something out of nothing. This OP never gets tired of his paranoia. Even when there is nothing to talk about relating to Muslims he tries to pull up anything possible. To feed of his hate and try to whitewash it.
And who agrees with the actions of Taliban? They come up with their own justifications for punishments and their interpretations. I agree that they shouldn't be enforcing any law since they are hypocrites in their own. I don't know where they got the idea to cut a nose. That being said, I mentioned if enforced by fair people and true people it would work. At the state it is now it does seek unfair because its exploited by certain people. I'm not playing your game, that doesn't mean I didn't offer any rebuttal. Anyone can see you're playing a continuous game. I know people like you. Don't think you caught me off guard of who you are.
^^^
What'd ya know? Another 'conservative' low grade moron. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!
And who agrees with the actions of Taliban? They come up with their own justifications for punishments and their interpretations. I agree that they shouldn't be enforcing any law since they are hypocrites in their own. I don't know where they got the idea to cut a nose. That being said, I mentioned if enforced by fair people and true people it would work. At the state it is now it does seek unfair because its exploited by certain people. I'm not playing your game, that doesn't mean I didn't offer any rebuttal. Anyone can see you're playing a continuous game. I know people like you. Don't think you caught me off guard of who you are.
Too bad for you, I am not playing a game. That is why I use sources and welcome any true rebuttal; something you have not offered.
Gatestone? Seriously? Now show us one reliable source.
You have a problem with the source then prove it wrong....
It's not my problem, the source is not reliable in any standards. It's a Jew pleading website and it's so obvious.
And who agrees with the actions of Taliban? They come up with their own justifications for punishments and their interpretations. I agree that they shouldn't be enforcing any law since they are hypocrites in their own. I don't know where they got the idea to cut a nose. That being said, I mentioned if enforced by fair people and true people it would work. At the state it is now it does seek unfair because its exploited by certain people. I'm not playing your game, that doesn't mean I didn't offer any rebuttal. Anyone can see you're playing a continuous game. I know people like you. Don't think you caught me off guard of who you are.
Too bad for you, I am not playing a game. That is why I use sources and welcome any true rebuttal; something you have not offered.
Rebuttal to what? There's nothing to refute.
