New York Times admits they lied, in retraction article, claim their sources cannot be reached

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
53,507
54,270
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/...e-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

"Mr. Comey did not say exactly what he believed was incorrect about the article, which was based on information from four current and former American officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because the information was classified. The original sources could not immediately be reached after Mr. Comey’s remarks, but in the months since the article was published, they have indicated that they believed the account was solid."


So fucking typical....all 4 sources cannot be reached? :badgrin:

I bet the "sources" were all from the DNC, if real at all.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/...e-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

"Mr. Comey did not say exactly what he believed was incorrect about the article, which was based on information from four current and former American officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because the information was classified. The original sources could not immediately be reached after Mr. Comey’s remarks, but in the months since the article was published, they have indicated that they believed the account was solid."


So fucking typical....all 4 sources cannot be reached? :badgrin:

I bet the "sources" were all from the DNC, if real at all.


Fuck 'em all. There was never any doubt that they are all fucking liars. When a guy like the former director of the FBI who has the highest level of intelligence info says that their stories were TRASH, I have no doubt of the efficacy of his reporting. It serves him absolutely not to spin the facts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top