New York Times confirmed Trump's wiretapping claim

[Mr.Blonde]

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

 

[Asclepias]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

 

[bendog]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

And even whackier given this thread. LOL

 

[Coyote]

The Russians were wire tapped dufus...not his aids...not Trump.

 

[Mr.Blonde]

So when liberals say something it is completely reasonable, but a conservative can say literally the same thing and it is a wacky conspiracy theory?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

 

[Asclepias]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

 

[Asclepias]

So when liberals say something it is completely reasonable, but a conservative can say literally the same thing and it is a wacky conspiracy theory?

Drumpf is not really a conservative for starters and he is anything but reasonable. He is at best a carnival barker. Anyone that lends credibility to his retarded claims is pretty much retarded themselves.

 

[bendog]

So when liberals say something it is completely reasonable, but a conservative can say literally the same thing and it is a wacky conspiracy theory?

You have yet to say anything reasonable. LOL

 

[skookerasbil]

More bumpy cucumbers coming for the fakes on the left. Even when the truth is in plain sight, they still do the fakery stuff. We are living in very interesting times.......certainly desperate times if you are a progressive. I could not be having more fun in these forums than these days........in fact, you might say up until a couple of months ago, it was pretty blasé and boring around here. The operative word of course is winning.

When will the k00ks on the left learn?

The answer is..........never, thus, the bumpys will continue for the long run. The bozo's still don't get that no more lackey presidents who bend over and take it up the butt. They keep messing with the wrong guy......who always wins.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

 

[Asclepias]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

No Drumpf. The NYT is not a person.

 

[boedicca]

The Russians were wire tapped dufus...not his aids...not Trump.

Uh - it says "Inquiry of Trump Aides". This shows that they were targeted.

Obabble is worse than Nixon.

 

[skookerasbil]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

No Drumpf. The NYT is not a person.

Snowflake responses are so irrelevant and so ghey.

 

[tinydancer]

The Russians were wire tapped dufus...not his aids...not Trump.

Clearly from all the reports Trump's aides were tapped. NYT said so.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

No Drumpf. The NYT is not a person.

Snowflake responses are so irrelevant and so ghey.

Dont be a snowflake then.

 

[bendog]

So when liberals say something it is completely reasonable, but a conservative can say literally the same thing and it is a wacky conspiracy theory?

Drumpf is not really a conservative for starters and he is anything but reasonable. He is at best a carnival barker. Anyone that lends credibility to his retarded claims is pretty much retarded themselves.

His claims are merely an attempt to inflame his base. Nothing else will set the rabid right off like "Obama tapped my phones." That plays into every racial/rw paranoia fantasy that gave birth to the birthers.

Trump is hardly crazy. We are now up to something like five of his campaign guys have lied about contacts with Russia, and Rince lied on Sunday talk shows a week ago last weekend. Trump is trying to reset the news focus.

We should be asking what are Trump Inc. ties to Russia - given that his family admits financial ties and has personal interactions with Putin's crew? Are the continuing lies denying ties attempts to coverup something?

Instead he wants to focus on some "misdeads" by Obama. I don't think it'll work because ultimately he's asking the intelliegence community to disclose what probable cause they had to target people in his campaign. We don't know that actually happened, but Trump says it did. And if it did, the disclosure of what constituted probable cause will not be good for his presidency.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Clearly, Trump and his people were wiretapped.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

View attachment 115702

So is it still a wacky conspiracy theory

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

No Drumpf. The NYT is not a person.

No Trump, as usual, misspoke by saying "Obama tapped my phones"...which is not true. But what may very well be true, and with significant evidence backing it up according to the NYT - is that the Obama administration used the FBI to probe a man running for President of the opposite party office and campaign HQ. And THAT would be unbelievable. Well beyond Watergate. If THAT is true then this is the story of the decade.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes. Its still a wacky conspiracy.

Please precisely explain why you think it is a wacky conspiracy?

The person making the claim is a wacky clown.

The NY Times?

No Drumpf. The NYT is not a person.

No Trump, as usual, misspoke by saying "Obama tapped my phones"...which is not true. But what may very well be true, and with significant evidence backing it up according to the NYT - is that the Obama administration used the FBI to probe a man running for President of the opposite party office and campaign HQ. And THAT would be unbelievable. Well beyond Watergate. If THAT is true then this is the story of the decade.

Drumpf misspeaks a lot it seems.

You mean the same FBI that announced they were reinvestigating Hilary right before the election? Why would the FBI that helped kill Hilary cooperate with Obama?