AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,335
- 9,175
- 1,340
How does the U.S. exit the agreement?
Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.
The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.
A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.
But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.
It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.
With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord
No treaty can be designed to avoid the constitutional requirements. The founders specifically designed our republic so the president could not take unilateral action on international agreements
NON BINDING AGREEMENT IS NOT A TREATY.
A nonbinding agreement is nonbinding
Either way results are the same.
The result as we agreed to it (yes agreement does actually exist, even if non-binding) and now Trump announced withdrawal from agreement.
Are you unclear about what nonbinding means? Or why its crazy to claim we are bound to a nonbinding agreement?
If the president how power to circumnavigate Congress with these agreements that spend our tax money, don't you think Jefferson would have used this to purchase Louisiana instead of the legitimate process?
The agreement is basically that United States, like other countries, will VOLUNTARILY work to reduce it's carbon output going forward. A treaty would be the law of the land, this IS NOT and yes, congress is not bound by it when it allocates funds.
It's a difference between a contract and a gentleman's agreement.