Paul Revere
Member
"IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD."
Not in addition, but exclusive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
"IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD."
Osama bin Laden: " There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
I cut and pasted ver batim from your link.
Unbelievable how Liberals defend anything that is anti-American.![]()
That does nothing to disprove OBL's involvement in 9/11.
![]()
Do you really believe that the FBI would post specifically that he is wanted for in connection with the bombings in Dar Salaam, Tanania, and Nairobi, Kenya, but fail to list the attacks on America September 11, 2001? .....
I'm sure there is plenty,
just not beyond a resonable doubt. It doesn't matter anyway, since we are war, and the same standards of proof that we use for US citizens for criminal acts do not apply. The man will eventually be killed by us or someone else and that will be the end of him.
I'm not that interested in responding to someone more interested in insults than discussion.
Any one care to post evidence that Osama bin Laden attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001?
I would like to review any evidence you can provide.
Checked out the links. None of them prove anything.OF Course it matters. The 9/11 attacks were a tremendous crime. The guilty deserve to punished.
If there is plenty, provide even a smidgen, just a little piece that will make me say oops, I have been mistaken.
What could you possibly mean by, the same standards of proof that we use for US citizens for criminal acts do not apply? What do you mean?
If he were alive, I believe we would know it.
I am certain that he is dead. He didnt have much time left when the United States CIA agent met with him in July 4-14,2001, while he underwent treatment for kidney problems at the American Hospital in Dubai, United ArabEmirates,
http://www.wanttoknow.info/011101londontimes (scroll down)
You misread the CBS news story. It's claims are dependent on a Pakistani nurse who says she saw Bin Laden in a Pakistan hospital. There was no claim that US military officials were there or even knew that he was there.or the night of Sept. 10, 2001, when we knew he was in a hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan getting kidney dialysis treatment with US military support.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/28/eveningnews/main325887.shtml
And the US letting Bin Laden slip away at Tora Bora was attributed to a lack of cooperation and communication between CENTCOM and the CIA. The CIA operations officer making the claim that we let Bin Laden get away wasn't even on the ground and he never implied that we deliberately let him go. Gary Berntsen, the CIA operations chief, was critical of Rumsfeld and the US military for letting Bin Laden get away at Tora Bora. If Bin Laden were working for the CIA, why would Bernsten, who had been working with the CIA since 1982, be upset that Bin Laden got away? If Bin Laden were really in cahoots with the CIA as an asset then why would a senior CIA officer even make that account available to the public in the first place?Or when the US let him get away in the Battle of Tora Bora, December 2001.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8853000/site/newsweek
Being a CIA asset has its benefits.
What is next from you, the video of OBL sitting around with his Atta laughing about the upcoming 9-11 was actually shot in the basement of the White House and directed by Karl Rove?
http://www.nbc4.tv/news/9980625/detail.html
All you have is a translated version of the French article. The sources were never revealed and everyone implicated denies it.Not true Le Figaro did confirm the story. Are you implying that because the paper is French there accuracy is questionable? HA! HA! What a laugh, along with the difficulties of translating French to English!
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
So what you're really saying is that Pakistan was helping Bin Laden? LMAO, that's not a conspiracy theory, that's echoing what many on the right and left have been saying from the beginning. Next.You are correct, that should be the Pakistan military support. They were there.
Besides the nurse, the article also credited Pakistan intelligence sources.
How does Tora Bora clear him of any involvement in 9/11???? Please explain the logic in that.Why would a senior CIA officer even make that account available to the public in the first place? Most likely because his was critical of Rumsfeld. Bad blood, writing a book, some or all. I really don’t care. They let him get away if he was at Tora bora. If he wasn’t there, they didn’t. I am certain beyond any doubt that he did not carry out 9/11.
Slipping up on a minor detail isn't factual by definition. You haven't proven any conspiracy. You provided three links and none of them support your position that Bin Laden didn't mastermind or participate in 9/11.No holes, just facts. I may slip on a minor detail, but the truth remains factual, a conspiracy did take place. It was a Neo-con New World Order conspiracy.