next target of the left will be talk radio

[GoneBezerk]

Once liberal scum realized Rush was powerful enough to expose Clinton was full of shit and he brought about the GOP revoution in Congress and Bush Jr beating algore....they invented lies that Rush was a racist, homophobe, etc.

99% of liberals that hate Rush have never listened to his show. They just spew bullshit that they were told by other idiots. "Rush eats black babies on the air...didn't you hear it?"

 

[Gadawg73]

No, wrong guy. I said no such thing. Show it to me.




Wrong again. What thread are you reading?
I've said nothing judgmentally on whether the FD should have been in place here or there. I just corrected all these blatant falsehoods about what it is. Read much?
By the way, as long as you're just making shit up ... you'll notice that your last two fabrications contradict each other. That's the hole that liars like you dig for themselves.





I'd love to. I devour treatises on media. So why didn't you link it?
Or are you just making it up like the rest of this shit?



I "left all that out" because it didn't exist. This was 1969. Are you reading this thread in Greek? What kind of internet service did you have in 1969?




- huh?

I'm supposed to hunt down one word from a guy who makes it up as he goes along? Don't hold your breath.




Once again, I said no such thing. I haven't mentioned "equal time rule" at all. Anywhere.
Wtf dood??




Patrick was the Commissioner at the time and led the issue.




Don't know and don't care. I don't follow the political red/blue game.




::yawn:: is there a point coming sometime soon?




..........AND???

.
.
Once again I don't know what kind of substance fuels your creative writing but you just made all this up, and based on the content I'd say don't quit the day job. All I did was correct a myth propagated way back in Post #4 about how the FD works. Since I'm a veteran of the broadcast and communications field over the last three decades I just might know a bit more about it. I took no position on what status is "should" have; the ignorance of the dittoist trolls jumping in to insist it meant the opposite of what it meant, is more than enough to handle. Besides which if they clearly don't understand the issue in the first place, then advocating a position on it either way would be pointless.

But then again I actually read what they write, which makes for a lot of work. Maybe I should follow your approach and just make it up. Must be easier.

So Bilko, here's your homework you left undone...
Where is this: Your partisan slant here is Exhibit A of that -?
Where is this: You fault conservatives for believing that the comments of the left will be turned into policy by this admistration -?
Where is this: and praise the left for their continued support of "what is fair" and "what the public wants" -?
Where is this: you claim here with a straight face you were not a supporter of the Fairness Doctrine -?
Where is this: you claim that there should have not been any worries about it coming back -?
Where is: "a proliferation of cable television, multiple channels within cable, public access channels and internet" in 1969 -?
Where is any mention of "Equal Time Rule"?

You've piled up an army of strawmen so you have a lot to undo.

Get to work.

I did my work and stated all the facts.
You listed little to no facts and made inferences that it was ONE person on the FCC that ended the Fairness Doctrine.
I schooled you on the law, all of the rulings, the reasons why they ruled that way and many of the reasons why there was good evidence that pointed to another attempt at enacting the Fairness Doctrine.
You have not yet proven a damn thing other than that you posted biased and half truth facts.
For starters, prove that it was JUST Patrick that abolished The Fairness Doctrine.
You stated HE abolished it so prove it.
Or admit you are wrong and move on. Meet at the 50 yard line and shake hands like a good sport.

Bilko, you don't "school" me on broadcast law, I guarantee that. You schooled us all on how to make shit up out of thin air like the liar you are.. Get the fuck over yourself, asswipe.

You're supposed to be working on those fabrications in red. Wanna see 'em again?
Where is this: Your partisan slant here is Exhibit A of that -?
Where is this: You fault conservatives for believing that the comments of the left will be turned into policy by this admistration -?
Where is this: and praise the left for their continued support of "what is fair" and "what the public wants" -?
Where is this: you claim here with a straight face you were not a supporter of the Fairness Doctrine -?
Where is this: you claim that there should have not been any worries about it coming back -?
Where is: "a proliferation of cable television, multiple channels within cable, public access channels and internet" in 1969 -?
Where is any mention of "Equal Time Rule"?

Come back when you're done.

Rotsa ruck.

All you have is childish 5 year old name calling because you can not back up your claims.

 

[Gadawg73]

Once liberal scum realized Rush was powerful enough to expose Clinton was full of shit and he brought about the GOP revoution in Congress and Bush Jr beating algore....they invented lies that Rush was a racist, homophobe, etc.

99% of liberals that hate Rush have never listened to his show. They just spew bullshit that they were told by other idiots. "Rush eats black babies on the air...didn't you hear it?"

They sure did a great job of "exposing Clinton" as "full of shit".
He was elected overwhelmingly to a 2nd term.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Right on cue...

Further demonstration of the talk radio inspired rhetoric which is destroying the Republican Party

ROFL

{And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.} - Barack Obama

 

[JakeStarkey]

Clinton was not a rapist. To write so is libel, a legal offense.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Clinton was not a rapist. To write so is libel, a legal offense.

Go fuck yourself, troll.

{"Rape is rape," said Obama.

President Bill Clinton plans to speak at the Democratic convention in North Carolina. Clinton, some might vaguely recall, was accused of rape by a woman named Juanita Broaddrick. "Dateline NBC" aired her allegations against the then-Arkansas attorney general and gubernatorial candidate.

Here's what Broaddrick alleged: "I first pushed him away. I just told him 'no.' ... He tries to kiss me again. He starts biting on my lip. ... And then he forced me down on the bed. I just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him 'no.' ... He wouldn't listen to me." To this day, former ABC reporter Sam Donaldson is the only national reporter to ask Clinton about Broaddrick's allegation.

Then there's Kathleen Willey, who on "60 Minutes" made a credible allegation of sexual assault against Clinton. Willey, a Clinton campaign volunteer, says that Clinton, in the Oval Office, took her hand and place it on his aroused genitalia: "He touched my breasts with his hand ... and then he whispered ... 'I've wanted to do this ever since I laid eyes on you.' ... He took my hand, and he put it ... on his genitals." Willey said she managed to push him away. }

Todd Akin Was Never Accused of Rape -- Unlike Bill Clinton - Larry Elder - [page]

 

[Gadawg73]

Clinton was not a rapist. To write so is libel, a legal offense.

To prove libel one has to prove that their reputation has been damaged.
His reputation was damaged goods long before he was even Govenor

 

[Gadawg73]

I am sure Clinton can prove his libel case, that he lost substantial amounts of $$$ in damages as a result of being called a rapist and he will earn less than the 10 million he makes this year because someone called him a rapist.
Even if one wins a libel, or any tort, suit they then have to prove damages.

 

[rightwinger]

No question that the rightwing talk radio and FoxNews are effective in giving the rightwing extreme their marching orders and rhetoric for the day

The TeaParty movement would not have existed without them. They are effective in sounding the alarm anytime a Republican strays from the approved conservative dogma. They are effective in establishing the Republican platform

Where they haven't been effective is in choosing conservative candidates who can win elections. They failed twice to defeat Obama. They failed to lead to Republican control of the Senate. They failed to defeat and repeal Obamacare. They failed to stop the spread of gay rights.

All in all, right wing radio has not been effective and in most cases they are counterproductive

 

[Gadawg73]

No question that the rightwing talk radio and FoxNews are effective in giving the rightwing extreme their marching orders and rhetoric for the day

The TeaParty movement would not have existed without them. They are effective in sounding the alarm anytime a Republican strays from the approved conservative dogma. They are effective in establishing the Republican platform

Where they haven't been effective is in choosing conservative candidates who can win elections. They failed twice to defeat Obama. They failed to lead to Republican control of the Senate. They failed to defeat and repeal Obamacare. They failed to stop the spread of gay rights.

All in all, right wing radio has not been effective and in most cases they are counterproductive

Tea Party started as Tax Policy ONLY.
THEN it took off with talk radio.
But the core beliefs that government taxes too much, spends too much $$$ and does a terrible job managing it has been around long before radio ever existed.

 

[grunt11b]

Oh, boy. Another Obama/leftist/liberal/progressive/commie/socialist/fascist conspiracy theory. God knows we don't have enough of them already.

This ought to be the new theme song of the looney right.

Napoleon XIV: 'They're coming to take me away' - YouTube

Each time someone predicts something you come out and say "Conspiracy" then when it comes to fruition you pretend like nothing is going on. Have some more koolaid.

 

[rightwinger]

No question that the rightwing talk radio and FoxNews are effective in giving the rightwing extreme their marching orders and rhetoric for the day

The TeaParty movement would not have existed without them. They are effective in sounding the alarm anytime a Republican strays from the approved conservative dogma. They are effective in establishing the Republican platform

Where they haven't been effective is in choosing conservative candidates who can win elections. They failed twice to defeat Obama. They failed to lead to Republican control of the Senate. They failed to defeat and repeal Obamacare. They failed to stop the spread of gay rights.

All in all, right wing radio has not been effective and in most cases they are counterproductive

Tea Party started as Tax Policy ONLY.
THEN it took off with talk radio.
But the core beliefs that government taxes too much, spends too much $$$ and does a terrible job managing it has been around long before radio ever existed.

I agree

The TeaParty was manipulated by the rightwing media. They evolved from a no tax movement to a modern day extension of the John Birch Society

 

[RandallFlagg]

No question that the rightwing talk radio and FoxNews are effective in giving the rightwing extreme their marching orders and rhetoric for the day

The TeaParty movement would not have existed without them. They are effective in sounding the alarm anytime a Republican strays from the approved conservative dogma. They are effective in establishing the Republican platform

Where they haven't been effective is in choosing conservative candidates who can win elections. They failed twice to defeat Obama. They failed to lead to Republican control of the Senate. They failed to defeat and repeal Obamacare. They failed to stop the spread of gay rights.

All in all, right wing radio has not been effective and in most cases they are counterproductive

Tea Party started as Tax Policy ONLY.
THEN it took off with talk radio.
But the core beliefs that government taxes too much, spends too much $$$ and does a terrible job managing it has been around long before radio ever existed.

I agree

The TeaParty was manipulated by the rightwing media. They evolved from a no tax movement to a modern day extension of the John Birch Society

The "right wing media"? You poor stupid fool...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Clinton was not a rapist. To write so is libel, a legal offense.

To prove libel one has to prove that their reputation has been damaged.
His reputation was damaged goods long before he was even Govenor

Not so, podjo. He was not a rapist, and to write it is libel. You have no defense in truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I am sure Clinton can prove his libel case, that he lost substantial amounts of $$$ in damages as a result of being called a rapist and he will earn less than the 10 million he makes this year because someone called him a rapist.
Even if one wins a libel, or any tort, suit they then have to prove damages.

Clinton could be awarded a dollar in damages, then make millions off the verdict.

 

[rightwinger]

Tea Party started as Tax Policy ONLY.
THEN it took off with talk radio.
But the core beliefs that government taxes too much, spends too much $$$ and does a terrible job managing it has been around long before radio ever existed.

I agree

The TeaParty was manipulated by the rightwing media. They evolved from a no tax movement to a modern day extension of the John Birch Society

The "right wing media"? You poor stupid fool...

If you take down your rabbit ears and pay for something called "Cable TV" there is a network called FoxNews...check them out sometime

You will get a laugh

 

[RandallFlagg]

I agree

The TeaParty was manipulated by the rightwing media. They evolved from a no tax movement to a modern day extension of the John Birch Society

The "right wing media"? You poor stupid fool...

If you take down your rabbit ears and pay for something called "Cable TV" there is a network called FoxNews...check them out sometime

You will get a laugh

You fools slay me.......


OK. Lets take a look at it, shall we? You can add I assume?

LIBERALS: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, Al-Jezerra, BBC America, NY TIMES, LA
------------
TIMES (Hell nearly every newspaper in America) NewsWeek, Time, (Hell, nearly every magazine in America)

CONSERVATIVES: FOX NEWS
----------------------

Yeah, I guess I can see where you might be going crazy with worry.....However, it IS worth noting that at most times of the day or night, FOX usually DESTROYS it's competition in nearly EVERY demographic. Admittedly, it's a little odd that the majority of Americans follow FOX for their news yet voted for that fool that you love so much. THAT part is, indeed, puzzling..........

 

[rightwinger]

The "right wing media"? You poor stupid fool...

If you take down your rabbit ears and pay for something called "Cable TV" there is a network called FoxNews...check them out sometime

You will get a laugh

You fools slay me.......


OK. Lets take a look at it, shall we? You can add I assume?

LIBERALS: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, Al-Jezerra, BBC America, NY TIMES, LA
------------
TIMES (Hell nearly every newspaper in America) NewsWeek, Time, (Hell, nearly every magazine in America)

CONSERVATIVES: FOX NEWS
----------------------

Yeah, I guess I can see where you might be going crazy with worry.....However, it IS worth noting that at most times of the day or night, FOX usually DESTROYS it's competition in nearly EVERY demographic. Admittedly, it's a little odd that the majority of Americans follow FOX for their news yet voted for that fool that you love so much. THAT part is, indeed, puzzling..........

The Fox is strong in this one.....

Buying into conservative dogma that all media outside of Fox is LIBERAL!

Also believing that Fox outdraws CBS, NBC or ABC

 

[RandallFlagg]

If you take down your rabbit ears and pay for something called "Cable TV" there is a network called FoxNews...check them out sometime

You will get a laugh

You fools slay me.......


OK. Lets take a look at it, shall we? You can add I assume?

LIBERALS: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, Al-Jezerra, BBC America, NY TIMES, LA
------------
TIMES (Hell nearly every newspaper in America) NewsWeek, Time, (Hell, nearly every magazine in America)

CONSERVATIVES: FOX NEWS
----------------------

Yeah, I guess I can see where you might be going crazy with worry.....However, it IS worth noting that at most times of the day or night, FOX usually DESTROYS it's competition in nearly EVERY demographic. Admittedly, it's a little odd that the majority of Americans follow FOX for their news yet voted for that fool that you love so much. THAT part is, indeed, puzzling..........

The Fox is strong in this one.....

Buying into conservative dogma that all media outside of Fox is LIBERAL!

Also believing that Fox outdraws CBS, NBC or ABC

Believe what you want. I understand that the idea Of FOX literally drives you clowns up the wall. I honestly get a chuckle from that. I'm not here to argue with you. You're not worth the time. I WILL however point out from time to time, that clowns like you have entirely too much time on your hands.

 

[Sarah G]

everything right or republican or right or republican related the left is determined to divide and conquer.
Its only natural the next target will be talk radio. Give it time

Roger?s Rules » The Next Target of Leftists: Talk Radio

Who cares about talk radio? Seriously.

Obama has a lot better things than talk radio coming up. Nobody cares about talk radio except teapartiers.

Get outta here with that stupid BS.