Next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...

[the other mike]

They are the reason America is dead. They are the cancer eating it alive. A bunch of stupid sit at homes who march when ordered by the propaganda masters.

That's a fucking antiwar protest dude.
People of all ages.
You need to stop getting your news from Bill Maher, the PNAC and the Ayn Rand foundation bulletin boards.

 

[francoHFW]

It is a failed and idiotic ideology. And the entire world knows it.

"The inheritors of the socialist ideal were totalitarian states on one hand and stagnant social democracies on the other. By the end of the twentieth century, these too had passed. China (and later Vietnam) decided that to get rich is glorious, the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact states collapsed into squabbling nationalities and kleptocracies, the socialist autocracies that had depended on Moscow for support receded into irrelevance. What Kristol called "a dwindling band of socialist fideists" remained behind, the last remnant of a dwindling faith. "People who persist in calling themselves socialist, while decrying the three quarters of the world that has proclaimed itself socialist, and who can find a socialist country nowhere but in their imaginings-such people are anachronisms."

The only people left calling for it are the miserable lazy parasites who want to mooch off of others.

What to Do About the Rebirth of Socialism

Nobody talks about socialism being communism-- totalitarianism that owns all business and industry, except brainwashed functional moron Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe Americans and far Right winger chumps everywhere, and Communist propagandists in Cuba North Korea and China. You won't catch a socialist in the modern world doing so. Everyone in the modern world who isn't brainwashed knows socialism is always Democratic Fair capitalism with a good safety net. The only modern successful country that doesn't is the United States. After 35 years of giveaway to the rich GOP tax rates, we have the worst inequality and upward Mobility in the modern world with the worst benefits. Great job scumbag GOP and silly Americans.... Try the post Cold War World, super dupers...

 

[francoHFW]

It is a failed and idiotic ideology. And the entire world knows it.

"The inheritors of the socialist ideal were totalitarian states on one hand and stagnant social democracies on the other. By the end of the twentieth century, these too had passed. China (and later Vietnam) decided that to get rich is glorious, the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact states collapsed into squabbling nationalities and kleptocracies, the socialist autocracies that had depended on Moscow for support receded into irrelevance. What Kristol called "a dwindling band of socialist fideists" remained behind, the last remnant of a dwindling faith. "People who persist in calling themselves socialist, while decrying the three quarters of the world that has proclaimed itself socialist, and who can find a socialist country nowhere but in their imaginings-such people are anachronisms."

The only people left calling for it are the miserable lazy parasites who want to mooch off of others.

What to Do About the Rebirth of Socialism

actually people who know the modern definition of socialism, ask Bernie Sanders or AOC and it has nothing to do with Communism and dictatorships that own all business and industry, super duper cold war brainwashed functional moron. Modern socialists are not communists duh. There is nothing scary about them, they are not mooches but they would like some help from the government for people to to get a good job, and actually can see past their noses, unlike you... Like a living wage, cheap college and training like every other modern country, as opposed to the scumbag GOP and silly dupes like you.

 

[dblack]

actually people who know the modern definition of socialism...

I totally get why you don't want to be associated with socialism. It has a pretty bad name in the US, and for good reason. But if you're not a socialist, for fuck's sake use another word. All the equivocation is deceitful.

 

[the other mike]

Since they raised the Social Security retirement age to 67 now ( anyone born after 1960 ) maybe we should change the name to
Capital Security.

 

[francoHFW]

actually people who know the modern definition of socialism...

I totally get why you don't want to be associated with socialism. It has a pretty bad name in the US, and for good reason. But if you're not a socialist, for fuck's sake use another word. All the equivocation is deceitful.

We are the only country that believes that socialism is communism and vice a versa. And only GOP dupes at that. Every Socialist Party in the modern world is democratic. And have been for many years...You dupes also believe a million phony scandals about Democrats and Misinformation about who pays taxes. Brainwashed functional morons like you....

 

[francoHFW]

Since they raised the Social Security retirement age to 67 now ( anyone born after 1960 ) maybe we should change the name to
Capital Security.

that's the full retirement age, you can still retire at 62 for 70% of the money. Thank you Democratic Party

 

[dblack]

actually people who know the modern definition of socialism...

I totally get why you don't want to be associated with socialism. It has a pretty bad name in the US, and for good reason. But if you're not a socialist, for fuck's sake use another word. All the equivocation is deceitful.

We are the only country that believes that socialism is communism and vice a versa. And only GOP dupes at that. Every Socialist Party in the modern world is democratic. And have been for many years...You dupes also believe a million phony scandals about Democrats and Misinformation about who pays taxes. Brainwashed functional morons like you....

More equivocation.

Seriously, every single reputable definition of socialism stipulates that it's an ideology advocating for democratic control of the means of production. If you're not advocating for that, guess what? You're not a socialist! And there's no need for you to be on this thread making a fool of yourself.

And if you are advocating for democratic control of the means of production, quit pussyfooting around and own up to it.

 

[francoHFW]

actually people who know the modern definition of socialism...

I totally get why you don't want to be associated with socialism. It has a pretty bad name in the US, and for good reason. But if you're not a socialist, for fuck's sake use another word. All the equivocation is deceitful.

We are the only country that believes that socialism is communism and vice a versa. And only GOP dupes at that. Every Socialist Party in the modern world is democratic. And have been for many years...You dupes also believe a million phony scandals about Democrats and Misinformation about who pays taxes. Brainwashed functional morons like you....

More equivocation.

Seriously, every single reputable definition of socialism stipulates that it's an ideology advocating for democratic control of the means of production. If you're not advocating for that, guess what? You're not a socialist! And there's no need for you to be on this thread making a fool of yourself.

And if you are advocating for democratic control of the means of production, quit pussyfooting around and own up to it.

I believe in good regulation of the means of production, which is one definition of control.I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist, as well as wanting benefits for workers what's every other modern country has besides us, the Chumps of the greedy idiot GOP rich.

You dupes just cannot stop saying socialism is communism while Bernie Sanders and AOC and other American and other modern socialists are all against communism obviously- you can't find a communist so shut the fuk up with the stupid bulshit, super duper. LOL

 

[dblack]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

 

[danielpalos]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

 

[dblack]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

 

[danielpalos]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

 

[dblack]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

 

[danielpalos]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

even Ogres have better arguments than You. why allege to be serious.

 

[dblack]

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

even Ogres have better arguments than You. why allege to be serious.

Piss off troll.

 

[danielpalos]

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

even Ogres have better arguments than You. why allege to be serious.

Piss off troll.

you need an argument, not just fallacy (of ad hominem) like any right winger.

the right wing is clueless and Causeless about economics. And, they don't Care.

the left are National Capitalists compared to the National Socialist right wing.

Government is socialism.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

Only command economies do that.

 

[dblack]

Piss off troll.

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

even Ogres have better arguments than You. why allege to be serious.

Piss off troll.

you need an argument, not just fallacy (of ad hominem) like any right winger.

the right wing is clueless and Causeless about economics. And, they don't Care.

the left are National Capitalists compared to the National Socialist right wing.

Government is socialism.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

Only command economies do that.

Piss off troll.

 

[danielpalos]

no actual rebuttal? The right wing doesn't care about Capitalism. Socialism on a national basis is all they know.

the left are national capitalists compared to the national socialist right wing.

Piss off troll.

even Ogres have better arguments than You. why allege to be serious.

Piss off troll.

you need an argument, not just fallacy (of ad hominem) like any right winger.

the right wing is clueless and Causeless about economics. And, they don't Care.

the left are National Capitalists compared to the National Socialist right wing.

Government is socialism.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

Only command economies do that.

Piss off troll.

in other words, You got Nothing; but blame me for being Troll.

even Ogres argue better than you.

 

[Blues Man]

I believe that wanting regulation of the means of production is enough to make one a socialist...

What you believe is irrelevant. The word already has a clear definition.

I still don't get why you're playing games with definition (unless the intent is deliberate obfuscation). Why not call your ideology something more accurate, or make a term? Then you won't have to be forever correcting people who don't know your "very special" definition. Doesn't it get old having to say "No, i'm not THAT kind of socialist."?

how about national capitalist? the right wing claims to be for capitalism, but national socialism is all they actually know.

Who is using the term national capitalist besides you?

If you stick to the definitions that are actually in the dictionary then what you post won't sound like gibberish