No Progressives Allowed On The Supreme Court

[rightwinger]

Democrats are prepared to add four progressive judges to SCOTUS


Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

You filthy vermin are ignoring peoples rights all over the country.

What right would that be?

 

[miketx]

Democrats are prepared to add four progressive judges to SCOTUS


Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

You filthy vermin are ignoring peoples rights all over the country.

What right would that be?

Pretending to be stupid fits you well.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. Time and again we find the Progressives championing the majority defined as the will of government, Rousseau’s ‘general will,’ against the Founder’s support for the individual. In Oliver Wendell Holmes, we see the danger of Progressives on the Supreme Court, not finding their mission to support the individual’s God-given natural rights, but, rather, the collective, the majority, as expressed by government. Holmes explained his desire to rubber-stamp government endeavors, thus: “I always say, as you know, that if my fellow citizens want to go to Hell I will help them. It's my job.”


Truly prescient of the Progressive to refer to Hell.



In another statement, Holmes reminded why he was big government’s go-to guy. He “asserted an almost unlimited government police power flowing from ‘the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law.’ It is the majority’s right to embody not just their opinions about proper protections of the public’s health or worker’s safety, but its opinions, period. …an essentially unlimited right. …the idea that any law enacted by a democratically legislature represents the will of a majority.” George Will, “The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 167

 

[RealDave]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

You mean when the Constitution says the Sennate to consider USSC nominees & they don't?

Like that????

 

[MACAULAY]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

______

Possibility the most full of shit post I have ever read on this board from possibility the most continually disingenuous poster on this board.

_____

 

[kaz]

American eugenics laws were created in the 1880's-1920 a period when the Republicans led the nation.

The most famous being Margaret Sanger who you still carry water for. Republican? Hardly. She's yours, Holmes

 

[kaz]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

You mean when the Constitution says the Sennate to consider USSC nominees & they don't?

Like that????

Except that never happened. Every nominee has been considered. Just some were told no. Like Robert Bork and Merritt Garland

 

[kaz]

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Liberals on the court stand up for the rights of We the People

Yes, but I'm a liberal, you're not. Leftists on the court stand up for robbing citizens at gunpoint. That's your crowd

 

[Redfish]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

horseshit

 

[Redfish]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

You mean when the Constitution says the Sennate to consider USSC nominees & they don't?

Like that????

Garland was considered, but the senate decided not to vote on him. the constitution was upheld, and it will be when Trump sends RBG's replacement to the senate for "consideration".,

 

[PoliticalChic]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

______

Possibility the most full of shit post I have ever read on this board from possibility the most continually disingenuous poster on this board.

_____

I may not agree with the language, but I certainly agree with the thought.

 

[LiberalsLIE]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.

They are sick degenerates, congenital liars.

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

You mean when the Constitution says the Sennate to consider USSC nominees & they don't?

Like that????

Work on your spelling, and then on your grasp of how the government of America works, RealDumb.

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

You mean when the Constitution says the Sennate to consider USSC nominees & they don't?

Like that????

Except that never happened. Every nominee has been considered. Just some were told no. Like Robert Bork and Merritt Garland

Bork....one of my favs!

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.

They are sick degenerates, congenital liars.

And they consider lying their birthright.

 

[22lcidw]

Democrats are prepared to add four progressive judges to SCOTUS


Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

You say that and we see constant tax hikes and loss of rights like with the pandemic. Repubs have done their damage to rights also over the years.

 

[Mac1958]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

______

Possibility the most full of shit post I have ever read on this board from possibility the most continually disingenuous poster on this board.

_____

Bummer!

 

[kaz]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

______

Possibility the most full of shit post I have ever read on this board from possibility the most continually disingenuous poster on this board.

_____

I may not agree with the language, but I certainly agree with the thought.

Mac has this idiotic thing where if you vote for Trump, you worship him, agree with him on every position and have no problem with anything he's ever said or done. If you vote for Biden, then just not liking Trump is fine.

He repeats that a hundred times a day and really adds nothing to it

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. Progressives are as certain as possible that they know what is best for the individual, no matter if the citizen has decided otherwise.

A fundamental American political doctrine holds that among the unalienable rights every individual possesses is a right to liberty of contract, which includes the right to freely contact to sell one’s labor or to purchase the labor of others. This right cannot be legislated out of existence for casual or disreputable reasons [as in Lochner, where large unionized bakeries demanded laws that limit the number of hours one can work] even when legislatures cloak their reasons in the language of social betterment. This doctrine is often ignored by Progressives in their desire to support collectivism, majority opinion, in opposition to individualism, and to grow the state’s police powers. Thus, Oliver Wendell Holmes opposed the Lochner decision that allowed workers to contract their labor as they saw fit, and he claimed it was government’s disapproval of ‘individualism’ should have dictated the decision.


Justice Holmes revealed the Progressive’s infatuation with government over the individual: “Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.” This is true to the extent that civilization is the result of government, rather than government being the result of civilization.”
George Will.



In Thoreau’s On the duty of Civil Disobedience, he states: “ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all of its own power and authority are derived.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

______

Possibility the most full of shit post I have ever read on this board from possibility the most continually disingenuous poster on this board.

_____

I may not agree with the language, but I certainly agree with the thought.

Mac has this idiotic thing where if you vote for Trump, you worship him, agree with him on every position and have no problem with anything he's ever said or done. If you vote for Biden, then just not liking Trump is fine.

He repeats that a hundred times a day and really adds nothing to it

Here is his funniest, most self-serving quote:
“Me, I'm the opposite. I like to have an accurate grasp of both (or more) sides of any issue, so that I can reach a thoughtful conclusion.”

History is repeating itself

I thought this might be a thread about how one profoundly damaged, arrogant, pugilistic, white, authoritarian, nationalist man can somehow gain the cult-like, aggressive, unconditional adoration of millions of people who enable all of his worst impulses and actions by refusing to hold him...

www.usmessageboard.com

His version of this:
`Little Jack Horner sat in a corner eating his Christmas pie. He stuck in a thumb and pulled out a plum and said, "What a good boy am I."'