Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A bit picky aren't we? There's no CO2 without carbon... you only get O2.... then you forget about CO ( which is not Co2) and methane ( CH4).bullshit
You have zero idea what you are talking about.
First and foremost, it is CO2 emissions, not CARBON emissions. You do not even no the proper terms to use!!!
Yes, maybe at 200 ppm we would not be able to grow anything, but there is nothing pushing CO2 level down , so that should not be a concern.Further, CO2 is at a historic low in the atmosphere, 400ppm. Green Houses increase CO2 to 1200ppm. Close to 200ppm and we will not be able to grow food, plant life begins to die.
So to begin, how low do you think CO2 should be.
Now we started with name-calling... The 8 to 1 is the EROI for some solar panels ( energy return on investment ).are you mental
anybody should hate something that costs $150 trillion dollars and has already proven itself to fail as an industrial source of electricity
Yield of 8-1, what exactly does that mean? Let us see if you can explain that to begin
Technically, it was a question.Now we started with name-calling... The 8 to 1 is the EROI for some solar panels ( energy return on investment ).
Name calling, no, it was a real question and not much different then when you put words into my mouth.Now we started with name-calling... The 8 to 1 is the EROI for some solar panels ( energy return on investment ).
Whatever the sunken costs of solar panel investment have been you can buy a couple of panels and a couple of batteries for $1,000.Name calling, no, it was a real question and not much different then when you put words into my mouth.
So you can attribute to me things I don't state or think but I can not reply in kind?
This paper claims 8.7 is the mean for monocrystalline cells and 11.6 for polycrystalline solar panels.Technically, it was a question.
You post stuff with no basis in reality, like the 8:1 bullshit
Solar and wind are subsidized and do not work.
whatever the paper claims, it is wrongThis paper claims 8.7 is the mean for monocrystalline cells and 11.6 for polycrystalline solar panels.
Nuclear only works for medium-scale projects.
My friend just spent $50k on his home solar, and wishes he could of spent more for a larger system. That is without batteries.Whatever the sunken costs of solar panel investment have been you can buy a couple of panels and a couple of batteries for $1,000.
Yes, the paper CLAIMS, it does not prove. I shall quote the claims.This paper claims 8.7 is the mean for monocrystalline cells and 11.6 for polycrystalline solar panels.
Nuclear only works for medium-scale projects.
Assuming that the life time of the system is 30 years
a thorough literature review was conducted.
EPBT and EROI data collected from the literature were harmonized for the specific parameters (module efficiency, solar insolation, and system lifetime) that affect the life cycle performance of the
PV system
Yes it does. Wow. You literally have negative net knowledge about this topic.hahahahahhaha
the first solar cell was invented in 1883
you can improve, what you call, "capacitor tech", what ever the fuck that is, all you want, but the sun does not have the energy density to give us the power to run our economy
Not everyone spends so much electricity. Since I live in a temperate zone I can cover my daily usage with 600 watts of power and a solar heater. I would still need batteries for overnight storage or pumped hydro for any long-term storage.My friend just spent $50k on his home solar, and wishes he could of spent more for a larger system. That is without batteries.
Your idea that it cost a $1,000 is ignorance if I am being nice.
uk.eco-worthy.com
600 watts, you are either fucking with me, or thee most ignorant person posting or the dumbest person posting. Dont call that name calling, cause it is not. It is a fact, tell us which of the 3 your are. If you can.Not everyone spends so much electricity. Since I live in a temperate zone I can cover my daily usage with 600 watts of power and a solar heater.
Let's not assume and talk about reality. There is no need for made up scenarios.Now assume a isolated town with 10K households where the nearest transmission line is located 100 miles away
Transmission line: 70 million. = 7,000K per household.
If you can not imagine, then you are in the wrong discussion.This 2,000 pound kit ( about 2,500 USD ) should be enough. I can't imagine why your friend needs a 50k system . Does he have 2 electric cars or a bitcoin mining facility?
No such thing as a gravity battery, they are called damsPV and wind are already cheaper than coal and oil and about even with NG.
Comparatively dirt cheap gravity batteries can store power at grid level.
No toxic or exotic materials. No pollution or by product.
100% reliability . Off the shelf components could be used anywhere .
600 watts of electricity a day? ... are you the dumbest person on this planet?600 watts, you are either fucking with me, or thee most ignorant person posting or the dumbest person posting. Dont call that name calling, cause it is not. It is a fact, tell us which of the 3 your are. If you can.
The smallest refrigerator used in hotel rooms, that fit under a desk, uses 600 watts of electricity a day. That is why I say you are either fucking with me, ignorant as hell, or very dumb.
They can also use solid materials: sand, and cement. But, granted, dams are usually cheaper.No such thing as a gravity battery, they are called dams
Dams, and pumped hydro is the most expensive form of electricity, period.
It is amazing the willful ignorance or the outright lying, or pure stupidity of those who call dams, gravity batteries.
Well, I can't imagine it. I consume 80 kWh per month: 2.6 kwh per day. The 2,500 USD solar panel kit is enough for me.If you can not imagine, then you are in the wrong discussion.
A bitcoin mining facility, hahahahahaha, that is very nice disparaging remark. Remember, you took your conversations to insulting before me, so dont cry when you get it back.
of course, at this point you have proved you dont know one thing about solar.
I will give you a nice fact. Solar Panels are a product of the Fossil Fuel industry, the chemical heavy industry. When there are no more chemicals from fossil fuels, there will be no more Solar Panels built.
