No terrorists here

[Annie]

Might is a very vague word. Is it likely? No. Is it possible? Yes. And if Israel nukes Iran without being DAMN sure that Iran is about to nuke them, the force of the world is going to very quickly be brought down upon Israels head, friend of the US or not.

Well that would scare them, after all the 'force of the world' has been so benevolent to Israel because they are friends with US.' Gag.

 

[Larkinn]

Well that would scare them, after all the 'force of the world' has been so benevolent to Israel because they are friends with US.' Gag.

Oh?

Pray tell how the force of the world has been used against Israel or brought down upon its head.

 

[Annie]

Oh?

Pray tell how the force of the world has been used against Israel or brought down upon its head.

Check UN condemnations. Check who supports, who abstains, who says no.

 

[Larkinn]

Check UN condemnations. Check who supports, who abstains, who says no.

Ah, well, that sure is the force of the world the UN having a military and all that and UN resolutions being followed to a T all of the time.

If Israel nuked Iran the response would be just a tad bit more strong than an UN resolution.

 

[Annie]

Ah, well, that sure is the force of the world the UN having a military and all that and UN resolutions being followed to a T all of the time.

If Israel nuked Iran the response would be just a tad bit more strong than an UN resolution.

Which of course what the 'world' and yourself are hoping for.

 

[Larkinn]

Which of course what the 'world' and yourself are hoping for.

That Israel would nuke Iran?

No, I don't really know anyone who wants that except some neocon Americans.

 

[Larkinn]

Which of course what the 'world' and yourself are hoping for.

BTW...try not to make stupid assumptions. I'm not anti-Israel. Nor am I pro-Israel. Both sides are fucked and have done terrible things. Israel deserves to be condemned, as does the PA.

 

[dread]

BTW...try not to make stupid assumptions. I'm not anti-Israel. Nor am I pro-Israel. Both sides are fucked and have done terrible things. Israel deserves to be condemned, as does the PA.

Why not?

You do it........

 

[Larkinn]

Why not?

You do it........

Really?

Name them.

 

[dread]

Really?

Name them.

I was hoping you would say that....


http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53174

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?p=670159#post670159

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?p=670096#post670096

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53511&page=3

 

[Larkinn]

I was hoping you would say that....


http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53174

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?p=670159#post670159

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?p=670096#post670096

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53511&page=3

Oh, this will be fun.

Please quote the exact language that you believe to be an assumption and what fact you believe I am assuming.

 

[dread]

Oh, this will be fun.

Please quote the exact language that you believe to be an assumption and what fact you believe I am assuming.

Well cheers, y'all don't care about anyone then!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53174


You assume here that conservatives dont care about anyone.



Then there is this..http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...159#post670159

You assume Jreeves is lying....by saying this. Do try and stop lying and actually attack the substance.

Just because YOU dont understand what the person is asking doesnt give YOU the right to assume THEY are lying.



Then how about this...http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...096#post670096

You assume that jreeves is a lazy bitch. When it was YOU who made the accusation and jreeves wasn't being lazy but expected some kind of cite.

I dont think you understand what cite is...

http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/cite.html

cite [ sīt ]


transitive verb (past and past participle cit·ed, present participle cit·ing, 3rd person present singular cites)

Definition:

1. quote something or somebody: to mention something or somebody as an example to support an argument or help explain what is being said



Lastly there was this:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...t=53511&page=3


WTF are you talking about? Glamorous? And really, mind your manners, boy.



You assume that I am a boy.

 

[Swamp Fox]

Might is a very vague word. Is it likely? No. Is it possible? Yes. And if Israel nukes Iran without being DAMN sure that Iran is about to nuke them, the force of the world is going to very quickly be brought down upon Israels head, friend of the US or not.

Like Israel gives a shit what the rest of the world thinks. The UN has been trying to get rid of Israel since it was created. Israel will do what it feels has to be done and then dare the rest of the world to do something about it.

 

[Larkinn]

Well cheers, y'all don't care about anyone then!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=53174


You assume here that conservatives dont care about anyone.

The "cheers" should have tipped you off that I was dicking around.

Then there is this..http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...159#post670159

You assume Jreeves is lying....by saying this. Do try and stop lying and actually attack the substance.

Just because YOU dont understand what the person is asking doesnt give YOU the right to assume THEY are lying.

I've had quite a few convos with Jreeves. I've seen his dishonesty, and he was obviously just trying to obfuscate the issue by lying. It was an assumption, but surely not a stupid one.

Then how about this...http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...096#post670096

You assume that jreeves is a lazy bitch. When it was YOU who made the accusation and jreeves wasn't being lazy but expected some kind of cite.

It takes 2 seconds to google UN charter article 2(4). Yes, he was being a lazy bitch.

I dont think you understand what cite is...

http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/cite.html

cite [ sīt ]


transitive verb (past and past participle cit·ed, present participle cit·ing, 3rd person present singular cites)

Definition:

1. quote something or somebody: to mention something or somebody as an example to support an argument or help explain what is being said

I quoted the UN charter Sec 2(4). I understand perfectly what a cite is.

Lastly there was this:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showth...t=53511&page=3


WTF are you talking about? Glamorous? And really, mind your manners, boy.



You assume that I am a boy.

98% of the internet is male. That again is an assumption, but not a stupid one.

Next?

 

[Swamp Fox]

Ah, well, that sure is the force of the world the UN having a military and all that and UN resolutions being followed to a T all of the time.

If Israel nuked Iran the response would be just a tad bit more strong than an UN resolution.

No it wouldn't. First reason, the UN is a toothless tiger. Second reason, there's a lot of people in the UN that wouldn't mind seeing Iran blasted off the map. None of the Arab countries would be crying, that's for sure.

 

[Larkinn]

Like Israel gives a shit what the rest of the world thinks.

Actually they do. Put brutal sanctions on Israel and in a few years they will be invaded by the Arab world.

The UN has been trying to get rid of Israel since it was created.

So the UN created Israel...then immediately changed its mind and decided that it wanted to get rid of it?

Israel will do what it feels has to be done and then dare the rest of the world to do something about it.

No they won't. Israel isn't as stupid as you are. They will push the rest of the world, but Israel isn't stupid enough to provoke the rest of the world into taking stringent counter-measures against them.

 

[Swamp Fox]

Actually they do. Put brutal sanctions on Israel and in a few years they will be invaded by the Arab world.

Only to get their asses handed to them again.

So the UN created Israel...then immediately changed its mind and decided that it wanted to get rid of it?

UN didn't create Israel, the British did under the Palestine Mandate. And the UN has stood by in every Arab-Israeli war and issued resolutions condeming the Israelis.

No they won't. Israel isn't as stupid as you are. They will push the rest of the world, but Israel isn't stupid enough to provoke the rest of the world into taking stringent counter-measures against them.

Israel will do whatever it takes to protect their sovereignty and they have said so repeatedly. They will never allow another Holocaust and if they have to nuke all of Arabia to stop one they will. Have you ever been to Israel or even read anything about it?

 

[Larkinn]

Only to get their asses handed to them again.

After sanctions? Perhaps not.

UN didn't create Israel, the British did under the Palestine Mandate. And the UN has stood by in every Arab-Israeli war and issued resolutions condeming the Israelis.

Umm, no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_UN_Partition_Plan

Actually the UN partition plan (the one that was implemented) was rejected by the British because it was too favourable to the Jews . In fact the Jews loved the plan and the Arabs hated it. Wait...that doesn't jive too well with the shit you've made up, does it?

Israel will do whatever it takes to protect their sovereignty and they have said so repeatedly.

Ah, well if they say it, it must be true.

They will never allow another Holocaust and if they have to nuke all of Arabia to stop one they will.

Suddenly we are talking about another Holocaust? Quite a jump you've made there.

Have you ever been to Israel or even read anything about it?

Haha...might want to check your own information before asking me if I've ever read anything on it.

 

[dread]

Umm, no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_UN_Partition_Plan

Actually the UN partition plan (the one that was implemented) was rejected by the British because it was too favourable to the Jews . In fact the Jews loved the plan and the Arabs hated it. Wait...that doesn't jive too well with the shit you've made up, does it?


Ummm...Yes!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel

1917-1945: British Mandate: The Jewish National Home
After World War I, the League of Nations formally assigned the Palestine mandate to the United Kingdom, endorsing the terms of the Balfour Declaration and additionally requiring the British to set up the Jewish Agency that would administer Jewish affairs in Palestine. An additional treaty was signed with the USA (which did not join the League of Nations) in which the USA endorsed the terms of the mandate


Ah, well if they say it, it must be true.

Name a war Israel has lost.




Suddenly we are talking about another Holocaust? Quite a jump you've made there.



Haha...might want to check your own information before asking me if I've ever read anything on it.

Ummmm...Swamp Fox HAS been to Israel and HAS read extensively about it AND has degree in terrorism. What part of arabs want jews dead DONT you understand?

http://www.cvspeaks.com/war_on_zionism.htm

In 1968, the Arab states founded the PLO with a Charter that specifically calls for “the liquidation of the Zionist presence.”

 

[Larkinn]

Ummm...Yes!

Umm, no. The UN plan was TOO favourable to the Jews. The one that the UN created. Doesn't jive well with the idea that the UN has always hated Israel.

Ummmm...Swamp Fox HAS been to Israel and HAS read extensively about it AND has degree in terrorism. What part of arabs want jews dead DONT you understand?

Oh it was just so simple that Arabs want Jews dead? Is that all he got from his degree? Somehow I think (know actually) its much more complicated.

http://www.cvspeaks.com/war_on_zionism.htm

In 1968, the Arab states founded the PLO with a Charter that specifically calls for “the liquidation of the Zionist presence.”

Yes, the Arab states don't like the creation of a new state that keeps taking their land and such. What a surprise.